Not sure if anyone saw this article (it was in a variety of publications) on the point differentials between Metro/Suburban v the 'traditional' playoff system that we currently, and previously, have. I'm sure I'm gonna stir the pot on this again, but I think the data is worth some discussion.
TL;DR: MASSIVE average point differential change comparing the two systems; a.k.a. less competitive state title games.
Metro/Suburban system average winning point margin
2022: 11.86
2023: 14.75
Traditional system average winning point margin
2021: 19.7
2024: 26
Also, as a thought experiment, I took out Chaminade-Madonna's games since they are massive outliers in the data. That makes each one:
M/S 2022: 8.71
M/S 2023: 8.86
Trad 2021: 19.5
Trad 2024: 24.5
Long story short, we had 2 years of just over 1 score games and now back to 3-4 score games.
Another thing I looked at was how many game were a running clock at the end of the game.
M/S 2022-2023: 1
Trad 2021 & 2024: 4
Shutouts
M/S 2022-2023: 1
Trad 2021& 2024: 3
So, if you like competitive games, no running clocks, no shutouts, it's blatantly obvious which is better.
Is Metro/Suburban perfect? No, nothing ever will be. Plus I always think I spelled suburban wrong. Did it lead to better football? Sure looks like it.
As someone who has been involved with both Metro and Suburban teams that made it to state titles, it just makes sense from a football perspective. How does it not make sense? Well the article discusses it and if I spell it out that'll for sure get under some folk's skin, even if it is the truth.
No matter what, I think we can all agree that a system where we have no idea how the points are figured is unacceptable and has to change.