-
Posts
1,272 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
24
Reputation Activity
-
Jambun82 got a reaction from KeemD321 in An officiating travesty: the story of Venice-SFA tonight.
I HAVE WATCHED A GOOD PART OF THE GAME ALREADY LITTLE BALLS!
-
Jambun82 got a reaction from Dan in Daytona in For Jambun82's Personal Enjoyment, from a friend
Dan, the strip by the St. Frances player that caused the fumble was ruled incorrect by the side judge, (I noticed that this was a 7-man officiating crew.) who did not seem to have a good angle to make a ruling on the play. However, since the official's whistle was blown, that ends the play immediately. On the play that was ruled a touchdown by Venice, the runner did not have possession in the opponent's end zone when the ball was separated. Also, it has to be noted that the officials do not have the luxury of the slow-motion ESPN replay, but I believe that the ruling was still incorrect. I will view the whole game at a later time. If there are any other calls. rulings, or fouls that any other poster felt was incorrect, please let me know at the approximate time in the game. Thank you.
-
Jambun82 got a reaction from DarterBlue2 in For Jambun82's Personal Enjoyment, from a friend
Dan, the strip by the St. Frances player that caused the fumble was ruled incorrect by the side judge, (I noticed that this was a 7-man officiating crew.) who did not seem to have a good angle to make a ruling on the play. However, since the official's whistle was blown, that ends the play immediately. On the play that was ruled a touchdown by Venice, the runner did not have possession in the opponent's end zone when the ball was separated. Also, it has to be noted that the officials do not have the luxury of the slow-motion ESPN replay, but I believe that the ruling was still incorrect. I will view the whole game at a later time. If there are any other calls. rulings, or fouls that any other poster felt was incorrect, please let me know at the approximate time in the game. Thank you.
-
Jambun82 got a reaction from Ray Icaza in An officiating travesty: the story of Venice-SFA tonight.
When I have something to say to you, you will hear me just fine badbird. What is more than that, a good friend of yours just might hear from me soon if he tries any sort of intimidation factors. DO YOU UNDERSTAND AND HAVE I MADE MYSELF CLEAR?
-
Jambun82 got a reaction from DisabledAccount in An officiating travesty: the story of Venice-SFA tonight.
Dan in Daytona has provided a video of the game, and I said that I would view it when I have time. I have other priorities that are more important than this message board. Besides that, I don't have to defend or explain anything to you or any other poster to this message board. The information that I provide and don't provide is my choice and I will NEVER answer to someone like you. DO YOU UNDERSTAND AND HAVE I MADE MYSELF CLEAR?
-
Jambun82 got a reaction from KeemD321 in For Jambun82's Personal Enjoyment, from a friend
Dan, the strip by the St. Frances player that caused the fumble was ruled incorrect by the side judge, (I noticed that this was a 7-man officiating crew.) who did not seem to have a good angle to make a ruling on the play. However, since the official's whistle was blown, that ends the play immediately. On the play that was ruled a touchdown by Venice, the runner did not have possession in the opponent's end zone when the ball was separated. Also, it has to be noted that the officials do not have the luxury of the slow-motion ESPN replay, but I believe that the ruling was still incorrect. I will view the whole game at a later time. If there are any other calls. rulings, or fouls that any other poster felt was incorrect, please let me know at the approximate time in the game. Thank you.
-
Jambun82 got a reaction from KeemD321 in An officiating travesty: the story of Venice-SFA tonight.
Usually, I expect and demand an answer when I ask a question. However, considering that the circumstances surrounding this so-called "terrible officiating" is not known, your non-answer makes perfect sense. Therefore, you are off the hook skyway, but don't get used to it.
-
Jambun82 got a reaction from DarterBlue2 in An officiating travesty: the story of Venice-SFA tonight.
I will also "find a way" to deal with the self-proclaimed "sexy beast" and his 25 sons when I am in the Western side of the county that I live in!
-
Jambun82 got a reaction from KeemD321 in An officiating travesty: the story of Venice-SFA tonight.
I will also "find a way" to deal with the self-proclaimed "sexy beast" and his 25 sons when I am in the Western side of the county that I live in!
-
Jambun82 got a reaction from KeemD321 in Lakeland-Venice
Perspective, the foul would be an Unsportsmanlike Conduct penalty, not a Personal Foul penalty. Obviously, every official has a different level of tolerance for an objection to a call by a coach or player. The NFHS rules states that a UNS Conduct foul by a non-player includes, but is not limited to, disrespectfully addressing or trying to influence a decision by an official. That is very broad, as you would already know in legalize terms. Certain Coaches reputation procedes them, and the language used by the coach has an effect obviously. Good Head Coaches will instruct their assistant coaches not to voice any objections or complaints to the officials, and a good sideline official will mention to the Head Coach in the pregame that he/she only wants to communicate with the Head Coach. I suppose that the situation comes down to the individual officials tolerance level, with good officials realizing and respecting that Coaches spend all week preparing for a emotional game where circumstances will come up where leeway should be given, and not everything is black and white. It is a fine balancing act.
-
Jambun82 got a reaction from Cat_Scratch in Teams you probably never heard of
Did any of the leather helmets get damaged? Obviously there were no face masks then, so did each team try to gouge the other teams player's faces?
-
Jambun82 got a reaction from Perspective in Lakeland-Venice
With me you know that you will always get a solid, straight answer that you can take to the bank and exchange for cash! In fact, it is same to assume that most message board posters would agree with the quote "That Jambun82 knows what he is talking about" You're welcome for that Perspective.
-
Jambun82 got a reaction from skyway in Lakeland-Venice
Perspective, the foul would be an Unsportsmanlike Conduct penalty, not a Personal Foul penalty. Obviously, every official has a different level of tolerance for an objection to a call by a coach or player. The NFHS rules states that a UNS Conduct foul by a non-player includes, but is not limited to, disrespectfully addressing or trying to influence a decision by an official. That is very broad, as you would already know in legalize terms. Certain Coaches reputation procedes them, and the language used by the coach has an effect obviously. Good Head Coaches will instruct their assistant coaches not to voice any objections or complaints to the officials, and a good sideline official will mention to the Head Coach in the pregame that he/she only wants to communicate with the Head Coach. I suppose that the situation comes down to the individual officials tolerance level, with good officials realizing and respecting that Coaches spend all week preparing for a emotional game where circumstances will come up where leeway should be given, and not everything is black and white. It is a fine balancing act.
-
Jambun82 got a reaction from VeniceIndianFan in Lakeland-Venice
VeniceIndiansFootball, UNS conduct is always penalized as a dead-ball succeeding spot foul, meaning that the penalty yardage is enforced from the spot that the ball will next be snapped or free-kicked.
-
Jambun82 got a reaction from badbird in Teams you probably never heard of
Did any of the leather helmets get damaged? Obviously there were no face masks then, so did each team try to gouge the other teams player's faces?
-
Jambun82 got a reaction from VeniceIndianFan in helmet issues all over central florida
I can say that even then as well as now, the great sport of football could not have survived without the true backbone and heart-and-soul of the sport. The Game Officials!
-
Jambun82 got a reaction from Dan in Daytona in Florida Football Fans...you might like this (NOT A SALES PITCH, a sport fans dream)
Goodnight.
-
Jambun82 got a reaction from Dan in Daytona in Florida Football Fans...you might like this (NOT A SALES PITCH, a sport fans dream)
The only universe I want to live in is one where I can visit a Florida High School Football message board, and not have to read a sales pitch for USA Today, Gannett Publishing, or the Daytona Beach News-Journal.
-
Jambun82 got a reaction from Ray Icaza in Florida Football Fans...you might like this (NOT A SALES PITCH, a sport fans dream)
If Dan feels the need to be a salesman for his former employer, I have a right to respond to him and challenge his true motive for doing so. This is a Florida High School Football message board, not an advertisement for USA Today, the Daytona Beach News Journal or any other joke of a "news service." similar to them.
-
Jambun82 got a reaction from badbird in Metro/Suburban Plan voted on. PASSED
You could also buy a shirt with black and white stripes.
-
Jambun82 got a reaction from Ray Icaza in Metro/Suburban Plan voted on. PASSED
You could also buy a shirt with black and white stripes.
-
Jambun82 got a reaction from badbird in What is the role of the athletic director
Maybe not, but it is enough for a threesome.
-
Jambun82 got a reaction from VeniceIndianFan in What is the role of the athletic director
Kinda Cool? I was born "Mr. Cool!" lol
-
Jambun82 got a reaction from VeniceIndianFan in What is the role of the athletic director
Maybe not, but it is enough for a threesome.
-
Jambun82 got a reaction from Nulli Secundus in What is the role of the athletic director
Kinda Cool? I was born "Mr. Cool!" lol