Jump to content

Cambridge Christian and prayer issue


Joshua Wilson

Recommended Posts

Tampa Bay Times is reporting that Cambridge Christian is tackling the issue still of being denied the right to prayer before the Class 2A State Championship game in December.

 

As such now the Liberty Institute has gotten involved and is sending a letter to the FHSAA offices demanding the association apologize for denying the prayer request.

 

STORY LINK: http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/hometeam/cambridge-christian-tackles-right-to-pray-before-games/2262811

 

I am finding this interesting. Not against prayer and not against use of the loudspeaker, but something also doesn't seem right either about the entire story on this issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I was in the stands when their pastor started to pray with the crowd just before kickoff and the music was so loud they had a hard time but they did get it done, At the VERY LEAST the FHSAA could do is to show some respect and give a couple minuets of silence to allow for prayer. 

 

I am a christain i think other christains sould be allowed to pray for the safty and health of all the players in the game.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get you on that Tiger. Not saying that is wrong, but my feeling is that the blame is being placed on the FHSAA totally when there are other parties involved including the operator of the Citrus Bowl. The fact yes the facility is being use by the FHSAA, but not at sole control by the FHSAA. This is where I am feeling not everything is on point totally here and where the FHSAA was put between a rock and a hard place on a decision that really required several yeses from different people and not just one person. That is what I am thinking, but I could be wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand not praying over the loud speaker (Cambridge or University) as they are not the "hosts" of the game. The FHSAA and the City of Orlando are.

But if the team prayed after the game, before the game, or if a local pastor led the fans in prayer before/during/after the game, I don't see the issue. If the music was loud, oh well. I am curious what the FHSAA did to stop the prayer. 

Also expect some bill to be proposed in the state legislature because of this.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand not praying over the loud speaker (Cambridge or University) as they are not the "hosts" of the game. The FHSAA and the City of Orlando are.

 

But if the team prayed after the game, before the game, or if a local pastor led the fans in prayer before/during/after the game, I don't see the issue. If the music was loud, oh well. I am curious what the FHSAA did to stop the prayer. 

 

Also expect some bill to be proposed in the state legislature because of this.

 

 

 

That is why the FHSAA said no because they would have had to get permission from everyone involved as hosts (FHSAA, City of Orlando, Central Florida Sports Commission) and to get all the proper permission in 48 hours is not likely going to happen. I have seen numerous teams pray before/after these games without any issue or the FHSAA saying no to it. The issue is over the PA system and that is where I feel the whole story is not being told in truth to be honest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well i just saw a segment about this on Fox and Friends this morning, So i expect things to get heated up real fast and maybe on a National Level. There are a lot of upset folks in this world that feel like Christians are getting run over because of political correctness, I truly believe that a strong Christian movement is about to start from the White House on down.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This whole thing is being blown way out of proportion, they were allowed to pray they just didn't get their way, you're not allowed to do it over the PA system.

 

Corey, I agree it has been...and hence why I said I feel the whole story was not being told in truth here about the real reasons why the FHSAA said no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would've prayed before the game anyways, what's the FHSAA gonna do fine them? OH NO A FINE!!!! Total BS. Let the kids pray. 

 

The FHSAA did and didn't have any issue. The whole issue was allowing them to use the loudspeaker and denying them the use of that. Otherwise prayer isn't the issue here. Seen many teams pray before/after a game at the state finals and not a single issue to be found with that from the FHSAA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The FHSAA did and didn't have any issue. The whole issue was allowing them to use the loudspeaker and denying them the use of that. Otherwise prayer isn't the issue here. Seen many teams pray before/after a game at the state finals and not a single issue to be found with that from the FHSAA.

Oh I agree with that, no it shouldn't be over the loud speaker since they are not the host team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Agree with what you think mostly, except I'd use a 4 year average and only move the top team in each region up and bottom team in each region down based on that average. I think 4 years gives a better overall picture of a program.
    • What this means is we will soon see one of two scenarios play out in the coming years: 1) A subset of students will eventually not be able to attend a "good" school because there is simply no space for them due to there being a scarcity of "good" schools 2) Assuming compulsory attendance remains a thing, we will see longtime elite private high schools nosedive in performance. The schools can not perform magic: unmotivated, unprepared often defiant students will NOT be good students no matter what the school does/doesn't do. And oftentimes these sorts of students do have parents who will do the absolute bare minimum needed to get the kid into a private school through the new rules. Anyone who genuinely believes that the schools with higher test scores automatically do a better job of teaching the kids than schools with lower scores is an imbecile. 
    • Here’s a scenario that will cook your noodle. There’s an 11th grader at a D rated public school. Lives in a bad neighborhood with a single mom and a bunch of siblings. Dirt poor, and struggle just to eat and keep the lights on. He can’t get a part time job to help out because he has to watch his little siblings while his mom works.    The school he plays for has poor attendance at the football games, and is always bad. He is a super star for them and tons of new bandwagon fans start to attend the games because they are good and he is the reason. School is making tons of new money.    Season is over. Back to reality for him. School year is over. Summer hits. Some “runner” on behalf of the rich local private school “offers” his mom, him, and all his siblings a way out of poverty. New place to live, food on the table, and an opportunity to get a quality education and maximize exposure for all the top colleges to see. A once in a lifetime opportunity to get his family out of poverty. What say you? Does he say no and continue to barely survive, or does he take the deal? 
    • To make it short and sweet. I am against breaking the rules. If there is a rule that seems outdated or unfair then it should be amended/changed/repealed with majority rule 
    • I am a huge proponent of innocent until proven guilty, and due process with credible evidence. I support a credible investigation, and not some witch hunt by disgruntled folks both near and far from the program. Let’s hope they can get to the bottom of this quickly 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...