Jump to content

WEEK 1 PREDICTIONS


THIS_IS_DILLARD

Recommended Posts


29 minutes ago, Jullian said:

Yup. Just my point. No backup QB. Anywho. We all got our opinions. 

Lmao the teams you mentioned yes. But I clearly stated that's the difference between IMG and those schools. IMG has depth at each position including QB. So I definitely didn't make your point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So from doing a little research there wasn't a big drop off between the starter and backup. Difference between the 2.....the starter is a junior and the 2 backups are sophmores. Both backups are 6'4 while the starter is 6ft even also the starter is more of a dual threat. The backup was actually considered to be the starter before the HC left for a job at Indiana. Also the back has been at IMG since he was in middle school and has 3 verbal offers from Brown, Kansas and Indiana. The third string is a transfer from Lighthouse Christian out of Pensacola. Where he started as a freshman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KeemD321 said:

Lmao the teams you mentioned yes. But I clearly stated that's the difference between IMG and those schools. IMG has depth at each position including QB. So I definitely didn't make your point.

How many real good QB’s do u think stick around when they don’t start? They go to these “factories” to be the man, not the backup. Anywho, that’s my point. Oh & also, the starter gets at least 70% of the reps during the week. U think img’s back up was fully ready for his “call to duty” Friday night? Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jullian said:

How many real good QB’s do u think stick around when they don’t start? They go to these “factories” to be the man, not the backup. Anywho, that’s my point. Oh & also, the starter gets at least 70% of the reps during the week. U think img’s back up was fully ready for his “call to duty” Friday night? Lol

Obviously the backup and the third string that I mentioned. Yes the starter may get those reps with the 1s. But the backup is still getting reps regardless whether its scout team or not he's still going up against top competition in practice. Also each player still gets individual position specific work with top notch trainers along with team training as well. Again its IMG and not a regular school. He's been at IMG since he was in middle school and was touted up to be the starter til the coaching change. The starter most likely was a better fit for the coaches scheme as he's a mobile threat. Still doesn't change the fact that IMG has 3 full time QBs on their National roster. 

I'm sure they have atleast 2 full time QBs each on the other 2 rosters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, KeemD321 said:

Obviously the backup and the third string that I mentioned. Yes the starter may get those reps with the 1s. But the backup is still getting reps regardless whether its scout team or not he's still going up against top competition in practice. Also each player still gets individual position specific work with top notch trainers along with team training as well. Again its IMG and not a regular school. He's been at IMG since he was in middle school and was touted up to be the starter til the coaching change. The starter most likely was a better fit for the coaches scheme as he's a mobile threat. Still doesn't change the fact that IMG has 3 full time QBs on their National roster. 

I'm sure they have atleast 2 full time QBs each on the other 2 rosters. 

Well the backup got his wish……didn’t go to well though….he gave up the winning TD!!!!! Oooppps……Lol. It was a bad pass & a great jump by the DB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jullian said:

Well the backup got his wish……didn’t go to well though….he gave up the winning TD!!!!! Oooppps……Lol. It was a bad pass & a great jump by the DB. 

Let me be clear on this: I’m sure not defending IMG. I don’t like that they are even acknowledged as a high school team, let alone in our state!!! 
Centrals DL, LB, & DB’s lined up with 4 & 5 star talent at nearly every position & stood up to em! Also the Rockets  OL!!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jullian said:

Well the backup got his wish……didn’t go to well though….he gave up the winning TD!!!!! Oooppps……Lol. It was a bad pass & a great jump by the DB. 

Lol you're definitely right about that. Thanks for the lil debate. Haven't had a good one in awhile lmao. But the odd thing about this IMG National squad is that there's no Senior QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...



  • Posts

    • Agree with what you think mostly, except I'd use a 4 year average and only move the top team in each region up and bottom team in each region down based on that average. I think 4 years gives a better overall picture of a program.
    • What this means is we will soon see one of two scenarios play out in the coming years: 1) A subset of students will eventually not be able to attend a "good" school because there is simply no space for them due to there being a scarcity of "good" schools 2) Assuming compulsory attendance remains a thing, we will see longtime elite private high schools nosedive in performance. The schools can not perform magic: unmotivated, unprepared often defiant students will NOT be good students no matter what the school does/doesn't do. And oftentimes these sorts of students do have parents who will do the absolute bare minimum needed to get the kid into a private school through the new rules. Anyone who genuinely believes that the schools with higher test scores automatically do a better job of teaching the kids than schools with lower scores is an imbecile. 
    • Here’s a scenario that will cook your noodle. There’s an 11th grader at a D rated public school. Lives in a bad neighborhood with a single mom and a bunch of siblings. Dirt poor, and struggle just to eat and keep the lights on. He can’t get a part time job to help out because he has to watch his little siblings while his mom works.    The school he plays for has poor attendance at the football games, and is always bad. He is a super star for them and tons of new bandwagon fans start to attend the games because they are good and he is the reason. School is making tons of new money.    Season is over. Back to reality for him. School year is over. Summer hits. Some “runner” on behalf of the rich local private school “offers” his mom, him, and all his siblings a way out of poverty. New place to live, food on the table, and an opportunity to get a quality education and maximize exposure for all the top colleges to see. A once in a lifetime opportunity to get his family out of poverty. What say you? Does he say no and continue to barely survive, or does he take the deal? 
    • To make it short and sweet. I am against breaking the rules. If there is a rule that seems outdated or unfair then it should be amended/changed/repealed with majority rule 
    • I am a huge proponent of innocent until proven guilty, and due process with credible evidence. I support a credible investigation, and not some witch hunt by disgruntled folks both near and far from the program. Let’s hope they can get to the bottom of this quickly 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...