Jump to content

792 Florida Sports Post Week 1 Rankings


DisabledAccount

Recommended Posts


Looking at the NE Florida area:

TCA vs Bolles will be good, definitely the two best teams in the area. 
 

Baker County looked significantly worse than expected against Bradford. Nease should not be first 10 out, losing against an Andrew Jackson team that is not very good. Ed White is as expected, a very solid team. 
 

NE Florida is quite weak right now. No real state title contenders with the transition to the new metro/suburban groups. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Jags904 said:

Looking at the NE Florida area:

TCA vs Bolles will be good, definitely the two best teams in the area. 
 

Baker County looked significantly worse than expected against Bradford. Nease should not be first 10 out, losing against an Andrew Jackson team that is not very good. Ed White is as expected, a very solid team. 
 

NE Florida is quite weak right now. No real state title contenders with the transition to the new metro/suburban groups. 

Yeah Baker struggled but despite what some have done that game was not final so I'm not considering the game until they complete it in week 7 that's why since Baker County was already in the first 10 out I just left them there 

 

When you say NE Florida what counties are you talking?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Ray Icaza said:

Regarding AHP, I would certainly put them ahead of a few teams ranked higher including ourselves. 

AHP has looked very impressive with their 2 OOS games but I think their dominance had more to do with these teams they played not being that good

 

AHP is still down from teams they had in the past but they have games remaining with Gibbons and Chaminade that should show where they stand at a state level 

 

Winning both would put them in the top 5 in Florida

 

If they split it or lose 2 close games there which I expect they will be in the 10-15 range which is where they were in preseason and now 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, nolebull813 said:

Columbia should be banned from a top 50 until they 1. Win a game. 2. Beat a team from the state top 75. 

I already have stated that if they don't look convincing in their game this week they won't be considered for rankings again the rest of the season without a ranked win and currently the only ranked team remaining is TCA

 

Columbia is in prove it or bye bye mode for this week, I'm just not ready to throw them to the bin after losing to argubly the best defense they will face all season 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ColumbiaHighFan2017class said:

AHP has looked very impressive with their 2 OOS games but I think their dominance had more to do with these teams they played not being that good

 

AHP is still down from teams they had in the past but they have games remaining with Gibbons and Chaminade that should show where they stand at a state level 

 

Winning both would put them in the top 5 in Florida

 

If they split it or lose 2 close games there which I expect they will be in the 10-15 range which is where they were in preseason and now 

Wait a min so let me get this logic str8. If AHP lose to close games to chaminade & gibbons they will still be top 10-15 in the state. 
 
but if Dillard loses close games to chaminade & let’s say MIAMI central we won’t even be deemed a top 50 team in Florida ??? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, THIS_IS_DILLARD said:

Wait a min so let me get this logic str8. If AHP lose to close games to chaminade & gibbons they will still be top 10-15 in the state. 
 
but if Dillard loses close games to chaminade & let’s say MIAMI central we won’t even be deemed a top 50 team in Florida ??? 

If you all lost to those 2 considering they are 1 and 2 you all would likely still be top 20-25 range 

 

They certainly aren't gonna fall out of the top 50 without losing to someone not named STA, Central and Chaminade

 

Even if they lost to all 3, if the games are close they probably still would be in the top 25 

 

Win 2/3 or have the 2 losses close while winning 1 and Dillard may be in the same range as AHP

 

Again it depends on how these games go

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best way to describe how I rank IN SEASON is look at how the CFB polls operate week to week 

 

Wins over higher ranked opponents lead to rising faster 

 

Losses to lower ranked drops hard 

 

Wins over lower ranked opponents may rise a spot or 2 at most while struggling with a lower ranked opponent may drop a spot or 2 depending upon how teams below them performed that week

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just like in the national polls, Dillard controls their own destiny

 

You have games with the #1,2 and 4 team in the state, how you do determines how far Dillard can rise in the poll but again look at a college poll

 

If you have the #12 team play the #1 team and lose by say 7 points

 

It's likely the #12 team probably falls to #14 or #15 

 

When you judge the rise/fall from that type of formula the rankings will make more sense 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously some teams fall harder or rise faster for large ranking gaps in the early weeks because I'm still trying to adjust to the preseason rankings which were a different formula but in later weeks the rankings don't change as significantly because many teams by that point in the rankings tend to be ones who beat similar to weaker teams and lose to teams above them so it's expected results so not as seismic of a shift  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ColumbiaHighFan2017class said:

Yeah Baker struggled but despite what some have done that game was not final so I'm not considering the game until they complete it in week 7 that's why since Baker County was already in the first 10 out I just left them there 

 

When you say NE Florida what counties are you talking?

Nassau, Duval, Baker, St Johns, Clay, Putnam, Union, Bradford, Suwannee, and Columbia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


  • Posts

    • Agree with what you think mostly, except I'd use a 4 year average and only move the top team in each region up and bottom team in each region down based on that average. I think 4 years gives a better overall picture of a program.
    • What this means is we will soon see one of two scenarios play out in the coming years: 1) A subset of students will eventually not be able to attend a "good" school because there is simply no space for them due to there being a scarcity of "good" schools 2) Assuming compulsory attendance remains a thing, we will see longtime elite private high schools nosedive in performance. The schools can not perform magic: unmotivated, unprepared often defiant students will NOT be good students no matter what the school does/doesn't do. And oftentimes these sorts of students do have parents who will do the absolute bare minimum needed to get the kid into a private school through the new rules. Anyone who genuinely believes that the schools with higher test scores automatically do a better job of teaching the kids than schools with lower scores is an imbecile. 
    • Here’s a scenario that will cook your noodle. There’s an 11th grader at a D rated public school. Lives in a bad neighborhood with a single mom and a bunch of siblings. Dirt poor, and struggle just to eat and keep the lights on. He can’t get a part time job to help out because he has to watch his little siblings while his mom works.    The school he plays for has poor attendance at the football games, and is always bad. He is a super star for them and tons of new bandwagon fans start to attend the games because they are good and he is the reason. School is making tons of new money.    Season is over. Back to reality for him. School year is over. Summer hits. Some “runner” on behalf of the rich local private school “offers” his mom, him, and all his siblings a way out of poverty. New place to live, food on the table, and an opportunity to get a quality education and maximize exposure for all the top colleges to see. A once in a lifetime opportunity to get his family out of poverty. What say you? Does he say no and continue to barely survive, or does he take the deal? 
    • To make it short and sweet. I am against breaking the rules. If there is a rule that seems outdated or unfair then it should be amended/changed/repealed with majority rule 
    • I am a huge proponent of innocent until proven guilty, and due process with credible evidence. I support a credible investigation, and not some witch hunt by disgruntled folks both near and far from the program. Let’s hope they can get to the bottom of this quickly 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...