Jump to content

Pahokee @ PB Central


561_Fan

Recommended Posts


11 hours ago, Jambun82 said:

561_Fan, what problems or issues did you have with the officiating? 

Mainly in the first quarter, PK had about 50+ penalty yards. The PK runner was down on the first drive and the Central defenders ripped the ball out and they were given possession. There was a deep pass where the Central DB ran through the PK, WR, and knocked him down and there was no call. They then gave Central a PI call when there QB clearly threw the ball out of bounds. It just seemed as every positive play PK had in the first, whether 5 or 15 yards was negated by a penalty. 
 

Luckily the defense held strong forcing turnovers and turnover on downs. The only points Central scored was off a fumble scoop and score.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go Blue Devils!!!! It seems that they are finally start to gel! I went to the game in Lakeland! The game against Osceola was a good game the Kowboys couldn't comeback and pull it out in the end! However,  In my picks here I was first to pick Pahokee to beat PB central So GO BLUE DEVILS!!!  PB Central regular season streak is over!!!!!!

St. Francis v Venice was some horrible home cooking officiating. Officials should never be a part of the deciding factor of a game. They can mentally discourage high school kids whom are going all out on their high in playing the game. However, Just as High as kids come to play the continuing non-substantiated calls or one sided calls can really deflate kids no matter the coaches game plan! Just be fair and balance!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, 561_Fan said:

Mainly in the first quarter, PK had about 50+ penalty yards. The PK runner was down on the first drive and the Central defenders ripped the ball out and they were given possession. There was a deep pass where the Central DB ran through the PK, WR, and knocked him down and there was no call. They then gave Central a PI call when there QB clearly threw the ball out of bounds. It just seemed as every positive play PK had in the first, whether 5 or 15 yards was negated by a penalty. 
 

Luckily the defense held strong forcing turnovers and turnover on downs. The only points Central scored was off a fumble scoop and score.

Thank you for the information 561_Fan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


  • Posts

    • What this means is we will soon see one of two scenarios play out in the coming years: 1) A subset of students will eventually not be able to attend a "good" school because there is simply no space for them due to there being a scarcity of "good" schools 2) Assuming compulsory attendance remains a thing, we will see longtime elite private high schools nosedive in performance. The schools can not perform magic: unmotivated, unprepared often defiant students will NOT be good students no matter what the school does/doesn't do. And oftentimes these sorts of students do have parents who will do the absolute bare minimum needed to get the kid into a private school through the new rules. Anyone who genuinely believes that the schools with higher test scores automatically do a better job of teaching the kids than schools with lower scores is an imbecile. 
    • Here’s a scenario that will cook your noodle. There’s an 11th grader at a D rated public school. Lives in a bad neighborhood with a single mom and a bunch of siblings. Dirt poor, and struggle just to eat and keep the lights on. He can’t get a part time job to help out because he has to watch his little siblings while his mom works.    The school he plays for has poor attendance at the football games, and is always bad. He is a super star for them and tons of new bandwagon fans start to attend the games because they are good and he is the reason. School is making tons of new money.    Season is over. Back to reality for him. School year is over. Summer hits. Some “runner” on behalf of the rich local private school “offers” his mom, him, and all his siblings a way out of poverty. New place to live, food on the table, and an opportunity to get a quality education and maximize exposure for all the top colleges to see. A once in a lifetime opportunity to get his family out of poverty. What say you? Does he say no and continue to barely survive, or does he take the deal? 
    • To make it short and sweet. I am against breaking the rules. If there is a rule that seems outdated or unfair then it should be amended/changed/repealed with majority rule 
    • I am a huge proponent of innocent until proven guilty, and due process with credible evidence. I support a credible investigation, and not some witch hunt by disgruntled folks both near and far from the program. Let’s hope they can get to the bottom of this quickly 
    • Thanks for admitting that you do not know why they transferred or the several others that mysteriously transferred to that school (not a known powerhouse).  Thanks for also agreeing you specifically have to ask all the kids that left for seemingly inexplicable reasons why.  That happened as a matter of fact which raises suspicion thus the launch of an investigation by the FHSAA who hopefully will ask YOUR question as well as many more to get to the bottom of it.  Any fair-minded person should readily support this investigation.  If you don't support and admitted you don't know the facts, you are basically guilty of what some are accusing you of.  I would hope you would like to know the TRUTH as opposed to simply attacking the messengers.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...