Jump to content

Top 3 Brevard games


KeemD321

Recommended Posts


Rockledge gets handled easily by Osceola with a score of 30 to 7. Their lone score came on a pick 6. Not sure if @Ray Icaza attended but I will watch the replay on space Coast daily. But from the box score Osceola completely dominated.

Merritt Island started the Jesuit transfer Knight and ended up losing to winless Heritage (now 1-4) 20 to 6.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the Rock got a heavy dose of reality.  They have some shifty elusive backs that managed to make a few positive plays but overall it wasn't as close as the score.  Not a criticism of the refs but we did rack up probably 200 yards in penalties keeping the few drives they had alive, but for a team that has been averaging about 40 points a game they scored "0" on that D.   Their only score was a tipped pass that they managed to secure and run in from about 15 yards out.  The ball also bounced their way most of the night as they fumbled 4 times but only loss one.  They will continue having trouble against bigger athletic teams as they are truly undersized with only a couple of exceptions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KeemD321 said:

Rockledge gets handled easily by Osceola with a score of 30 to 7. Their lone score came on a pick 6. Not sure if @Ray Icaza attended but I will watch the replay on space Coast daily. But from the box score Osceola completely dominated.

Merritt Island started the Jesuit transfer Knight and ended up losing to winless Heritage (now 1-4) 20 to 6.

 

Just got home and the score didn't reflect the dominance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ray Icaza said:

Just got home and the score didn't reflect the dominance. 

Definitely looking forward to your breakdown of the game. Didn't get to catch it live but once I heard the score update of 21 to 0 during the Cocoa game I had feeling Rockledge may have got exposed. Really thought that game would be a lot closer with the way Rockledge was playing as a team. The past 4 weeks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ray Icaza said:

Looks like the Rock got a heavy dose of reality.  They have some shifty elusive backs that managed to make a few positive plays but overall it wasn't as close as the score.  Not a criticism of the refs but we did rack up probably 200 yards in penalties keeping the few drives they had alive, but for a team that has been averaging about 40 points a game they scored "0" on that D.   Their only score was a tipped pass that they managed to secure and run in from about 15 yards out.  The ball also bounced their way most of the night as they fumbled 4 times but only loss one.  They will continue having trouble against bigger athletic teams as they are truly undersized with only a couple of exceptions.

Thanks for the update. Looks like they definitely got a major dose of reality and they still have 3 tough games left in Eau Gallie, Manatee and Cocoa. I still feel like they will edge out Eau Gallie, but this game is definitely an eye opener.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


  • Posts

    • Unions want their members compensated. Districts are slow to compensate teachers and coaches, period. Because ultimately coaches/sponsors are extracurriculars, and not the primary focus of the district despite what some on this board would have you believe. Make it easy, ask your local principal how many teaching openings they have this year in their faculty, ask how much turnover will exist in their ranks this summer, and when they replace them, how many will be highly qualified teachers. Ask the AD how many of their coaches are not highly qualified. The problem from the district and unions' perspective is that there isn't a coaching shortage, somebody always wants to be a coach, but few want to be a math teacher or special education and have their career tied to a test that they have no control over. So just like in the business world, you should pay more to get a person to do the job if nobody is willing to do it. Now if you want to blame the unions, blame them and the districts for not being flexible in salaries for areas of critical needs/shortages. Despite their being a shortage, it isn't a universal shortage. Florida isn't struggling for social studies teachers, PE teachers, or elementary teachers, but secondary math, science, english, special ed (all levels), and world languages. Unions/districts have been reluctant to give extra pay to those subjects to entice people to enter the field, but notice, PE teacher isn't on that list. __________________ To give an idea of what will happen, let's use Madison County (since they were mentioned in an above post). Madison County has 30 head coaches and JV/assistant coaches (including cheerleading). The total amount of salaries that they put to those positions is %66,706. Madison County had a budget of $24 million, so .27% of their total budget. If the proposed bill passes, Madison County would spend 322,500, which represents 1.34% of their budget, about 4.8 times more than current. Now, if the state legislature would simple just add the $260,000 onto the budget, the unions wouldn't care other than making sure that all assistant/jv/and non mentioned coaches from the PB Post article are included. But that isn't what will happen, instead it will be a specific line in the budget from the state legislature, similar to technology or textbooks, money will be required to be spent on the salaries and the state will offer no additional funding (or they will only do it for 2 or 3 years, and when there are new priorities, they will still require it but provide no funding for it). Now, if they offer no additional funding, what happens is that money comes from somewhere in the budget. Considering that that this be part of "teacher salaries", that means it will be pulled from general instructional salaries portion of the budget, which means less money for teachers. So yes, teachers will be upset when the state legislature yet again promises something and then underdelivers (see making the starting salary $47,500).
    • low pay and high expense on housing, while are in the talks, coaches are leaving becuase of resources.  Mike Coe of coffee who was at union county and was a state championship contender year in and out, leaves to go to ga, in 3 seasons they went 15-0 this past yr, have an indoor field being built, makes a ton of money, all his 20 coaches do as well.  resources, the ability to say if we want something, we dont have to sell discount cards and do car washes to buy 10 helmets, we go to people with power/money/boosters/etc and say we need 10 helmets.  look up his twitter, thats where this all came from. camden county and travis roland, same deal.  win a title at mainland and goes fundraising the next week.  or go to camden, takes his staff, make more money, have incredible resources to facilitate what a state championship program should look like, same-read his twitter. id say majority of coaches would work in FL for what coaches rate is, if there were resources available that if you ask for it, its done.  not having to spend the summer selling cards or raffle tickets or whatever they do....
    • The rationale for allowing unlimited transfers, while also allowing an effectively unregulated "NIL" market, is that players should be able to do ANYTHING that helps them better themselves. ANY limits or regulations are said to be immoral, and probably rooted in "white supremacy". Welp, imagine a player playing on a team that's getting their butts kicked. You can't argue that it wouldn't improve his marketability to simply take off his uniform and walk over to the other sideline during the game. NOW, he's on the WINNING team. It would be MUCH better for the player to be on the winning team than to be a no-good loser. And, since "equity" is seen as THE most (if not only) important thing-whereby "equity" is defined and measured by the equivalence (or lack thereof) of outcomes- allowing all of the players on the losing team to simply leave and join the winning team, it all makes perfect sense!* *While bitter sarcasm was employed here, this is not really a joke. Using the current rationale, the above IS consistent with the rationale.
    • Teachers are sometimes their own worst enemies.
    • This is a bit of an incoherent mess. The matter of parents' rights is separate from teacher/coaches pay and teacher certification. All are valid, but distinct, concerns. 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...