Jump to content

2017 Scheduling Notes


Cocoa2010

Recommended Posts


Talking about your logic that a team isn't at someone's level because they take a loss to them

 

I didn't say that either.

 

Columbia got embarrassed. Not just any loss. An embarrassment at home in a state semifinal.

 

A three touchdown loss to a bad team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That ain't Silly and i have facts to back it up

 

Our record since 2013 has been better on the road then at home

 

6 losses at home

 

5 on road

 

Home field is an advantage, period. Especially in the state semifinal.

 

Not just because of crowd noise.

 

The fact that they can't protect their home field is more proof that they're not any good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know nothing about the Columbia program

 

You are used to a team basically handed a championship on a silver platter

 

I guarantee you if we had all the talent handed to us that sta has we would pulverize you

IDK about that, and Handed ?. STA isn't handed transfers. They all have to go through enrollment plan like every other student.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Agree with what you think mostly, except I'd use a 4 year average and only move the top team in each region up and bottom team in each region down based on that average. I think 4 years gives a better overall picture of a program.
    • What this means is we will soon see one of two scenarios play out in the coming years: 1) A subset of students will eventually not be able to attend a "good" school because there is simply no space for them due to there being a scarcity of "good" schools 2) Assuming compulsory attendance remains a thing, we will see longtime elite private high schools nosedive in performance. The schools can not perform magic: unmotivated, unprepared often defiant students will NOT be good students no matter what the school does/doesn't do. And oftentimes these sorts of students do have parents who will do the absolute bare minimum needed to get the kid into a private school through the new rules. Anyone who genuinely believes that the schools with higher test scores automatically do a better job of teaching the kids than schools with lower scores is an imbecile. 
    • Here’s a scenario that will cook your noodle. There’s an 11th grader at a D rated public school. Lives in a bad neighborhood with a single mom and a bunch of siblings. Dirt poor, and struggle just to eat and keep the lights on. He can’t get a part time job to help out because he has to watch his little siblings while his mom works.    The school he plays for has poor attendance at the football games, and is always bad. He is a super star for them and tons of new bandwagon fans start to attend the games because they are good and he is the reason. School is making tons of new money.    Season is over. Back to reality for him. School year is over. Summer hits. Some “runner” on behalf of the rich local private school “offers” his mom, him, and all his siblings a way out of poverty. New place to live, food on the table, and an opportunity to get a quality education and maximize exposure for all the top colleges to see. A once in a lifetime opportunity to get his family out of poverty. What say you? Does he say no and continue to barely survive, or does he take the deal? 
    • To make it short and sweet. I am against breaking the rules. If there is a rule that seems outdated or unfair then it should be amended/changed/repealed with majority rule 
    • I am a huge proponent of innocent until proven guilty, and due process with credible evidence. I support a credible investigation, and not some witch hunt by disgruntled folks both near and far from the program. Let’s hope they can get to the bottom of this quickly 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...