Jump to content

Recommended Posts


Posted
8 hours ago, nolebull813 said:

West Boca vs Chaminade is probably the main event of the KoC week

Probably so, and a good excuse to stop by Fran's Chicken Haven in Boca Raton. 

Posted
8 hours ago, nolebull813 said:

They have at least 17 returning starters if you include a quarterback, who transferred in after the quarterback from last year transferred out

Ok ok, and I was actually shocked when he transferred like bro yall just completed a state championship season and the schools first ever. 
 

There’s no other school you can go to that you can redo that feeling with. 

Posted
18 hours ago, DILLARDBOYZ954 said:

How is Bradford suppose to be looking ? They’re in 1A right now?

They should still be in 2A. They loss to Newberry in the playoffs last season

Posted
4 hours ago, DILLARDBOYZ954 said:

Ok ok, and I was actually shocked when he transferred like bro yall just completed a state championship season and the schools first ever. 
 

There’s no other school you can go to that you can redo that feeling with. 

The QB for West Boca transferred to St Thomas Aquinas. So he will be able to have a chance to repeat the feeling. Lol.

And the QB West Boca got to replace him is the stud from Ely who led them to one of the biggest upsets of the year against Chaminade. He had 462 yards of offense and 5 touchdowns against them!!!!

Posted
22 hours ago, DILLARDBOYZ954 said:

Do west Boca have a lot returning ?

Literally half of West Boca's players don't even go to the school.  They are Rise Preparatory Academy rent-a-players.  RPA signs these players and send them to whichever team needs a player and they are all high end prospects.  If your team has a bunch of RPA players, then you are a serious threat to win a title. The fact that WB has so many RPA players should tell you how strong they are and also how they got that strong so quickly.

Posted
1 hour ago, PinellasFB said:

Literally half of West Boca's players don't even go to the school.  They are Rise Preparatory Academy rent-a-players.  RPA signs these players and send them to whichever team needs a player and they are all high end prospects.  If your team has a bunch of RPA players, then you are a serious threat to win a title. The fact that WB has so many RPA players should tell you how strong they are and also how they got that strong so quickly.

Rise Prep from Miami 66 miles away?

Posted
8 hours ago, PinellasFB said:

Literally half of West Boca's players don't even go to the school.  They are Rise Preparatory Academy rent-a-players.  RPA signs these players and send them to whichever team needs a player and they are all high end prospects.  If your team has a bunch of RPA players, then you are a serious threat to win a title. The fact that WB has so many RPA players should tell you how strong they are and also how they got that strong so quickly.

So would you put them in the same category as IMG Academy.

Posted
5 hours ago, FBGUY1989 said:

So would you put them in the same category as IMG Academy.

Keeping it real , a lot of these schools are just like iMG

Sta, American Heritage, Chaminade for example. 
 

only difference is , iMG has dorms on campus & plays a 10 game national schedule, they don’t care about being apart of the FHSAA playoffs or winning a championship. And they still get Top D1 offers. 
 

where as chaminade, STA, American heritage, they may not have dorms on campus, but it’s a few kids I know personally that has lived with some of the coaching staff, they recruit/get transfers state wide and nationally. And that mad expensive tuition half the time don’t even be charged to the players they really wanna have on the team. 
 

but yet they still get to unfairly compete in the regular FHSAA playoffs and state championships. 

Posted

You raise a good point.  Let's look at the 2025-2026 tuition for some of the powerhouse schools frequently mentioned herein.  STA: $16,500; C-M: $17,150; First Academy: $26,270; AH-P: $42,700(!).  I'm sure these are all excellent schools and well worth the money to those so inclined.  But makes one wonder how these players from "extreme poverty" (as described by one poster) can afford to pay these rates.  Obviously, they are receiving "financial aid" to offset all or some of the expense.  I guess they are allowed to do that.  But is that same financial aid available to a young lady from the same background who wants to take AP courses and play in the band?  Maybe; I guess it's a matter of priorities.  Either way, it's easy to see why people are suspicious of these schools and the advantages they possess.   

Posted
2 hours ago, DILLARDBOYZ954 said:

Keeping it real , a lot of these schools are just like iMG

Sta, American Heritage, Chaminade for example. 
 

only difference is , iMG has dorms on campus & plays a 10 game national schedule, they don’t care about being apart of the FHSAA playoffs or winning a championship. And they still get Top D1 offers. 
 

where as chaminade, STA, American heritage, they may not have dorms on campus, but it’s a few kids I know personally that has lived with some of the coaching staff, they recruit/get transfers state wide and nationally. And that mad expensive tuition half the time don’t even be charged to the players they really wanna have on the team. 
 

but yet they still get to unfairly compete in the regular FHSAA playoffs and state championships. 

What about the public schools? They get double digit transfers every year. No one ever says a peep about them. Public schools actually have it easier because they don’t have to jump through financial aid and tuition barriers. The only difference is it appears that when giving the opportunity kids want to get the better education along with the top-notch football experience.
 

Miami Northwestern is not in a desirable location for families to move to, but they can get 20 transfers in one off-season. Does that mean they are IMG?

Posted
1 hour ago, Dr. D said:

You raise a good point.  Let's look at the 2025-2026 tuition for some of the powerhouse schools frequently mentioned herein.  STA: $16,500; C-M: $17,150; First Academy: $26,270; AH-P: $42,700(!).  I'm sure these are all excellent schools and well worth the money to those so inclined.  But makes one wonder how these players from "extreme poverty" (as described by one poster) can afford to pay these rates.  Obviously, they are receiving "financial aid" to offset all or some of the expense.  I guess they are allowed to do that.  But is that same financial aid available to a young lady from the same background who wants to take AP courses and play in the band?  Maybe; I guess it's a matter of priorities.  Either way, it's easy to see why people are suspicious of these schools and the advantages they possess.   

If the school is giving financial aid/scholarships only to athletes, that would be an impermissible benefit and would violate FHSAA rules.  As long as all the students are on an even playing field, the aid can be provided.   It's uncanny, however, how many 'underprivileged' kids end up at these expensive schools and what percentage of them play sports.  The reality is that the families/students that can afford to pay full freight do so and end up subsidizing those kids who can't afford it and then up hold their chests out all proud when their school wins a state title. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, MarkECannon said:

IMG’s tuition is between $75,000- $95,000.  I’ve spoken to some parents of IMG football players.  They told me it was all on scholarship.

Yeah the IMG state teams are the ones who pay the money so daddy can brag to his buddies that his son little Johnny “GOES TO IMG!!!!” 
 

Saying it with the Intention to conflate the national team everyone thinks of IMG of,  and the state ones who can get boat raced by the 50th best Florida team. 

Posted
53 minutes ago, nolebull813 said:

What about the public schools? They get double digit transfers every year. No one ever says a peep about them. Public schools actually have it easier because they don’t have to jump through financial aid and tuition barriers. The only difference is it appears that when giving the opportunity kids want to get the better education along with the top-notch football experience.
 

Miami Northwestern is not in a desirable location for families to move to, but they can get 20 transfers in one off-season. Does that mean they are IMG?

I don't know of many (if any) people who fault athletic/talented kids for taking advantage of the opportunities that come their way.  I certainly don't -- although from time-to-time I do catch myself looking over at the sidelines at a football game involving a private school and wondering how many of the kids on that team would have any desire whatsoever to attend that particular private school were it not for sports.   But, I usually resolve that issue in my brain by concluding that, in all likelihood, a kid at CCC or Berkeley or Jesuit is probably getting a better education and overall high school experience than if they were at their local  D or F rated public school . . .  and that's a good thing. 

From my standpoint, athletic kids can go to whatever school they want to.  Those kids are entitled to attend a public school.  They are not entitled to attend a private school.  In order to attend a private school, the kid and his/her family must go through the same application process that any other kid goes through.  If they meet the academic standards established by the private school, and if they qualify for financial aid and the school is willing to provide financial aid to all kids who get accepted and who qualify, that's great.  Everyone wins.  But, as it stands right now, no schools - public or private - are allowed to recruit kids to come to their school for the purpose of playing sports.  And private schools are not allowed to offer 'scholarships' to kids as an inducement to get those kids to attend.  Sadly, this is what is happening.  I say "sadly" not because I hate on kids who might benefit from their athletic talent to improve their station in life.  I'm all in favor of that.  I say "sadly" because we end up with a system where schools are breaking the rules in hopes of winning a state championship in a particular sport that likely will be forgotten by most everyone but them in a decade and doing so in a manner that gives them a distinct advantage over the schools that try to play by the rules.   Just remember, each time one of those rule-breaking schools wins a state title, there's one other team that has been denied a state title and/or one other team that was denied the opportunity to play for a championship. 

Posted
21 minutes ago, MarkECannon said:

IMG’s tuition is between $75,000- $95,000.  I’ve spoken to some parents of IMG football players.  They told me it was all on scholarship.

Again, that means there are a lot of parents of tennis players, soccer players and baseball players overpaying for their kid's education/athletic development so that IMG can field a football team full of D1 prospects. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...



  • Posts

    • Larry Blustein podcast link talking about this event: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/south-florida-high-school-sports-radio/id993198627?i=1000717251522
    • I suddenly wish Bridgewater had known he was breaking the rules and kept it on the DL.  He obviously cares a lot about that program and those kids.  Hate to see a guy who cares like that get taken down while the true cheaters are out there doing their thing.
    • Yes, the free market should be allowed to draw the lines between amateurism and professionalism. The beauty of playing strictly for the love of the game will certainly be allowed to persist. And, kids and adults alike play A LOT of games for fun as it is. See adult rec leagues, intramurals etc. This includes those who've been able to become wealthy through playing the sport as well!  I think that, eventually, people like most all of us are going to recognize that it is preposterous to have teenagers getting paid to play high school sports, and/or get a free college education along with the extra compensation. Most of us have been fans of the game and of the school, not the "star" athletes. In the long run, I don't think there will be much of a market for paid teenager athletes. But, if someone is willing to part with their $ to allow a kid to be less poor, and that means that School A easily crushes the competition, I don't think that's a bad thing. It IS a thing that will cause a great many people to lose interest. And that will in turn diminish the market, which will of course mean kids aren't making any money anyway. At issue, as I keep harping on, is the fact that the "big time" sports world where NIL money is available is an entirely different, beast of an animal that K-12 schools and even universities are not equipped to manage. Nor should they be. Big time, for profit sports should be separated from schools. The mission of the two entities is competely misaligned. 
    • It is somewhat understandable for a guy who's passionate about the sport, and who reached very close to the pinnacle of it, to be dismissive of the many dimwits making the rules who have none of the above characteristics. And, he may also be considering the possibility that calling attention to the (perhaps) absurd nature of the rules and/or the dearth of funding in high school football may be worth it in the big picture. He's almost certainly going to have the opportunity to coach at the higher levels, and is not likely to be at Norhwestern for very long, anyway. He may make a bigger impact long-term/big picture doing this sort of thing than just winning a couple state titles and jetting.
    • I think the argument is this:  if 'free adults are allowed to give gifts to poor kids who happen to be good at sports,' we move from an amateur environment into a professional environment.   Historically, high school sports, college sports and even the Olympics were reserved solely for amateur athletes.  Within the last couple of decades, the barriers for professionals started to erode for the Olympics.   You may recall that Jim Thorpe won gold medals in track in the 1912 Olympics, but was stripped of those medals because he had played minor league (or "semipro") baseball prior to participating in the Olympics.   Ultimately, those medals were restored a few years ago.  The USA Olympic basketball team used to be comprised only of college players.  Now, it's all pros (with one or two college stars).  Within the last 5-10 years, NIL changes have permitted college athletes to receive compensation. Before then, the rules in place for decades allowed college student-athletes to receive room, board and tuition.  The $100 post-game handshakes from alums in the locker room and brown paper bags filled with money - although they happened everywhere - were illegal (and arguably still are; they just don't happen as much because the athletes can receive money legally through NIL). The NIL world is quickly filtering down to the high school level.  However, the rules in most all states, and certainly in Florida, are rooted in the concept that only amateur athletes can compete in high school sports.   And if you allow athletes to receive gifts, or otherwise compensate them or their families, such athletes are no longer considered amateurs.   Simply put, the rules has always been that if you get compensated to do play a sport, you are considered a professional.  And professionals cannot participate in amateur sports.  Again, the rules in place (FHSAA Rules) are rooted in a clear distinction between amateur sports and professional sports.  There was a clear line that is slowly becoming more and more blurred. If you want the argument as to why the rule makes sense, I think it is this:   there is a certain beauty in amateur sports, knowing that everyone who is playing is playing for the love of the game and not for money.  Everything changes once you start compensating athletes.  As I have stated before, the concept of compensation is a slippery slope.  What do you allow and what don't you?   FHSAA rules prohibiting impermissible benefits were written before Uber even existed. But the rule is pretty clear:  if you give something to football players that you don't give to all other students, that's an impermissible benefit - especially if the benefit is given to entice a kid to come to your school.   If you allow schools/coaches/alums to compensate kids to play sports, then you take away the somewhat-level playing field.  And, over time, certain schools will dominate high school sports because they will have the financial wherewithal to attract the most talented athletes.  While this might be good for the handful of select, talented athletes, everyone else suffers.   I guess the real question is whether we just want to eliminate the distinction between amateur athletics and professional athletics altogether and simply allow the free-market system to play out for all athletes and all schools?  If you're inclined to answer this question with a "yes," I have only six words for you:  be careful what you wish for.   
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...