Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

8/22/25 - DR.PHILIPS (HOME) “BROWARD VS USA SHOWCASE”

8/29/25- STRANAHAN (HOME)

9/5/25- NORTHEAST * (HOME) 

9/13/25- @ BOYD ANDERSON (SATURDAY NIGHT)

9/20/25 - MIRAMAR (HOMECOMING SATURDAY NIGHT)

9/26/25 SUNCOAST* (HOME)

10/4/25 “SOUL BOWL” @ BLANCHE ELY (SATURDAY NIGHT)

10/10/25 @ * DR.GARCIA 

10/24/25 * BOYNTON BEACH (HOME) 

10/31/25 @ DEERFIELD BEACH 

LETS GET IT PANTHERS!!!! #DillardOverEverybody.


Posted
15 hours ago, DILLARDBOYZ954 said:

8/22/25 - DR.PHILIPS (HOME) “BROWARD VS USA SHOWCASE”

8/29/25- STRANAHAN (HOME)

9/5/25- NORTHEAST * (HOME) 

9/13/25- @ BOYD ANDERSON (SATURDAY NIGHT)

9/20/25 - MIRAMAR (HOMECOMING SATURDAY NIGHT)

9/26/25 SUNCOAST* (HOME)

10/4/25 “SOUL BOWL” @ BLANCHE ELY &nbsp

10/10/25 @ * DR.GARCIA 

10/24/25 * BOYNTON BEACH (HOME) 

10/31/25 @ DEERFIELD BEACH 

LETS GET IT PANTHERS!!!! #DillardOverEverybody.

Wow 10-0!!!!!

Ely lost some dudes including their elite QB. And none of those other teams outside of MAYYYBBEEEE Miramar has a chance. Maybe Dr Pepper, but I think Dillard gets em. 
 

Overall this is not a great schedule, but the positive is Dillard will get a lot of guys valuable playing time, and the record going  into the offseason of 10-2 or 11-1 will be attractive to studs who want to be apart of something on the cusp of taking the next step 

 

Posted

Remember Ely is Dillard rival and record goes out the window. Besides Ely Miramar and Dr. Phillips might be the only other tough games. I'll say the regular season ends 

10-0

8-2

7-3

Posted
9 hours ago, Perspective said:

In your opinion, which of those games, if any, will Dillard be the underdog and have trouble winning?

Honestly, with the team Dillard has returning and the additions their getting, if they hit the ground running, they can very well go 10-0.

but with this sports stuff , we know teams start to hit their stride after a few games. 
 

our toughest games from toughest to least I’ll say.

#1. DR.PHILIPS, this will be the first ever meet up between these two teams, so Dillard would have to adjust during the game to whatever they may throw at us. 
 

dr.philips was in the state semis last year with a 12-2 record. So they will be coming in to make a statement as well. 
 

#2. Ely(soul bowl) enough said. Records go out the window. 

Posted
7 hours ago, nolebull813 said:

Wow 10-0!!!!!

 

Ely lost some dudes including their elite QB. And none of those other teams outside of MAYYYBBEEEE Miramar has a chance. Maybe Dr Pepper, but I think Dillard gets em. 
 

 

Overall this is not a great schedule, but the positive is Dillard will get a lot of guys valuable playing time, and the record going  into the offseason of 10-2 or 11-1 will be attractive to studs who want to be apart of something on the cusp of taking the next step 

 

Dr.pepper lmao lol

Posted
7 hours ago, nolebull813 said:

Wow 10-0!!!!!

 

Ely lost some dudes including their elite QB. And none of those other teams outside of MAYYYBBEEEE Miramar has a chance. Maybe Dr Pepper, but I think Dillard gets em. 
 

 

Overall this is not a great schedule, but the positive is Dillard will get a lot of guys valuable playing time, and the record going  into the offseason of 10-2 or 11-1 will be attractive to studs who want to be apart of something on the cusp of taking the next step 

 

In regards to our schedule. aye lol you can’t break contract. Four of those teams are district games so we got to play them. 

Ely- that’s soul bowl that game will always be played .

Deerfield , Miramar , stranahan & B.A were all 2 year home & away agreements. 

So this year the location is just flipping. 

We could’ve had STA, central,MNW,img, st Francis & bishop Gorman on the schedule ima still stand 10 toes down and say LINE DAT SH*T UP.

Posted
2 hours ago, FBGUY1989 said:

Remember Ely is Dillard rival and record goes out the window. Besides Ely Miramar and Dr. Phillips might be the only other tough games. I'll say the regular season ends 

10-0

8-2

7-3

7-3 would be a huge disappointment. At worst 8-2, dare I say 9-1. Anything else would be a problem for me lol. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Perspective said:

So, is this going to be a situation where Dillard will have a fantastic regular season, going 10-0 or 9-1, and then falter in the playoffs because they didn't play anyone challenging in the regular season?

No the same thing is gonna happen to them that happens to every other team. They are forced to face a recruited up all star transfer team full of 4 and 5 star guys at every position and lose by 35. Just as nature intended :P

Posted
12 hours ago, DILLARDBOYZ954 said:

7-3 would be a huge disappointment. At worst 8-2, dare I say 9-1. Anything else would be a problem for me 

I said 7-3 because I can see Dillard loosing to these three but nobody else on the schedule.

Dr. Phillips 

Miramar 

Ely 

Posted
4 hours ago, Perspective said:

So, is this going to be a situation where Dillard will have a fantastic regular season, going 10-0 or 9-1, and then falter in the playoffs because they didn't play anyone challenging in the regular season?

I wouldn’t go that far. Only because I believe in our coaching staff. We had this same schedule last year, lost our starting Qb in week 7 & had to lean on our sophomore 3rd string qb , which led us to a first round playoff victory over previously unbeaten John caroll catholic , and then led us to a 14-0 halftime lead on the road vs then #30 in the nation American heritage. Ultimately losing 24-14. 
 

When it comes to Dillard this year, this year is about building on last years run/success. There’s no need to line the schedule up with national ranked opponents, because as of right now Dillard isn’t a nationally ranked program. We lost a few pieces in the trenches to MacArthur, and 2 skilled players to plantation. 
 

in return we did receive a 4* prospect Qb from tru north and a few other skilled players, but we have to see how all of that jells in the regular season. 
 

Anything short of a 2nd round appearance in the playoffs will be a huge step back. A regional final appearance/Win would be a Huge Step forward. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, nolebull813 said:

They lost their all everything QB. Did they get a good replacement or is the backup a stud? 

Didn’t even know he left I know they lost a couple players to McArthur and 2 WRs to monarch, but it’s crazy tho because I’ve been hearing all around from different sources Ely is gonna be in a rebuild this year. Don’t know how true that it is, but I don’t give a dam 0-6 or 6-0 in week 7 we better kick they buck teeth in lol.

Posted
3 hours ago, FBGUY1989 said:

I said 7-3 because I can see Dillard loosing to these three but nobody else on the schedule.

Dr. Phillips 

Miramar 

Ely 

Dr.philips , is a 50-50 matchup if I’m gonna be honest. First time opponent, first game of the season. Rust, nerves, so many different factors that can take place. 
 

Miramar - seems like we play this dam team every year lmao sheessh. I think we’re rivals at this point. Every game is close and down to the wire, and the band battles be fire lol. 
 

nonetheless over the past 6 years, Dillard is (6-0) vs Miramar. Beating them 6 consecutive years. With this year being Not only At Dillard on the new field, but it’s also homecoming. I would be very shocked if Dillard lost that. 
 

ely- soul bowl will always be soul bowl. Records don’t mean a dam thing, and this year we go to ely. So we will see who take it this year. 

Posted
4 hours ago, nolebull813 said:

No the same thing is gonna happen to them that happens to every other team. They are forced to face a recruited up all star transfer team full of 4 and 5 star guys at every position and lose by 35. Just as nature intended :P

I agree with all that instead of the 35 point blow out. If we can hold our own against #30 in the nation heritage, at heritage and only lose by 10. I’ll take that over getting boat raced by 35 lmao lol. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


  • Posts

    • Larry Blustein podcast link talking about this event: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/south-florida-high-school-sports-radio/id993198627?i=1000717251522
    • I suddenly wish Bridgewater had known he was breaking the rules and kept it on the DL.  He obviously cares a lot about that program and those kids.  Hate to see a guy who cares like that get taken down while the true cheaters are out there doing their thing.
    • Yes, the free market should be allowed to draw the lines between amateurism and professionalism. The beauty of playing strictly for the love of the game will certainly be allowed to persist. And, kids and adults alike play A LOT of games for fun as it is. See adult rec leagues, intramurals etc. This includes those who've been able to become wealthy through playing the sport as well!  I think that, eventually, people like most all of us are going to recognize that it is preposterous to have teenagers getting paid to play high school sports, and/or get a free college education along with the extra compensation. Most of us have been fans of the game and of the school, not the "star" athletes. In the long run, I don't think there will be much of a market for paid teenager athletes. But, if someone is willing to part with their $ to allow a kid to be less poor, and that means that School A easily crushes the competition, I don't think that's a bad thing. It IS a thing that will cause a great many people to lose interest. And that will in turn diminish the market, which will of course mean kids aren't making any money anyway. At issue, as I keep harping on, is the fact that the "big time" sports world where NIL money is available is an entirely different, beast of an animal that K-12 schools and even universities are not equipped to manage. Nor should they be. Big time, for profit sports should be separated from schools. The mission of the two entities is competely misaligned. 
    • It is somewhat understandable for a guy who's passionate about the sport, and who reached very close to the pinnacle of it, to be dismissive of the many dimwits making the rules who have none of the above characteristics. And, he may also be considering the possibility that calling attention to the (perhaps) absurd nature of the rules and/or the dearth of funding in high school football may be worth it in the big picture. He's almost certainly going to have the opportunity to coach at the higher levels, and is not likely to be at Norhwestern for very long, anyway. He may make a bigger impact long-term/big picture doing this sort of thing than just winning a couple state titles and jetting.
    • I think the argument is this:  if 'free adults are allowed to give gifts to poor kids who happen to be good at sports,' we move from an amateur environment into a professional environment.   Historically, high school sports, college sports and even the Olympics were reserved solely for amateur athletes.  Within the last couple of decades, the barriers for professionals started to erode for the Olympics.   You may recall that Jim Thorpe won gold medals in track in the 1912 Olympics, but was stripped of those medals because he had played minor league (or "semipro") baseball prior to participating in the Olympics.   Ultimately, those medals were restored a few years ago.  The USA Olympic basketball team used to be comprised only of college players.  Now, it's all pros (with one or two college stars).  Within the last 5-10 years, NIL changes have permitted college athletes to receive compensation. Before then, the rules in place for decades allowed college student-athletes to receive room, board and tuition.  The $100 post-game handshakes from alums in the locker room and brown paper bags filled with money - although they happened everywhere - were illegal (and arguably still are; they just don't happen as much because the athletes can receive money legally through NIL). The NIL world is quickly filtering down to the high school level.  However, the rules in most all states, and certainly in Florida, are rooted in the concept that only amateur athletes can compete in high school sports.   And if you allow athletes to receive gifts, or otherwise compensate them or their families, such athletes are no longer considered amateurs.   Simply put, the rules has always been that if you get compensated to do play a sport, you are considered a professional.  And professionals cannot participate in amateur sports.  Again, the rules in place (FHSAA Rules) are rooted in a clear distinction between amateur sports and professional sports.  There was a clear line that is slowly becoming more and more blurred. If you want the argument as to why the rule makes sense, I think it is this:   there is a certain beauty in amateur sports, knowing that everyone who is playing is playing for the love of the game and not for money.  Everything changes once you start compensating athletes.  As I have stated before, the concept of compensation is a slippery slope.  What do you allow and what don't you?   FHSAA rules prohibiting impermissible benefits were written before Uber even existed. But the rule is pretty clear:  if you give something to football players that you don't give to all other students, that's an impermissible benefit - especially if the benefit is given to entice a kid to come to your school.   If you allow schools/coaches/alums to compensate kids to play sports, then you take away the somewhat-level playing field.  And, over time, certain schools will dominate high school sports because they will have the financial wherewithal to attract the most talented athletes.  While this might be good for the handful of select, talented athletes, everyone else suffers.   I guess the real question is whether we just want to eliminate the distinction between amateur athletics and professional athletics altogether and simply allow the free-market system to play out for all athletes and all schools?  If you're inclined to answer this question with a "yes," I have only six words for you:  be careful what you wish for.   
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...