Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

952 games played thus far between schools from different classifications.

7A vs CL W - L
    6A 28 - 30
    5A 15 - 17
    4A 17 - 22
    3A 16 - 11
    2A 6 - 3
    1A 2 - 4
    Rur 1 - 2
    Ind 15 - 6
    SSA 3 - 3
      103 - 98
           
6A vs CL W - L
    7A 30 - 28
    5A 31 - 24
    4A 29 - 21
    3A 22 - 12
    2A 7 - 15
    1A 1 - 2
    Rur 1 - 3
    Ind 9 - 2
    SSA 1 - 1
      131 - 108
           
5A vs CL W - L
    7A 17 - 15
    6A 24 - 31
    4A 30 - 22
    3A 30 - 21
    2A 5 - 10
    1A 4 - 5
    Rur 4 - 2
    Ind 9 - 1
    SSA 0 - 2
      123 - 109
           
4A vs CL W - L
    7A 22 - 17
    6A 21 - 29
    5A 22 - 30
    3A 31 - 24
    2A 13 - 14
    1A 9 - 6
    Rur 2 - 1
    Ind 6 - 3
    SSA 3 - 5
      129 - 129
           
3A vs CL W - L
    7A 11 - 16
    6A 12 - 22
    5A 21 - 30
    4A 24 - 31
    2A 15 - 18
    1A 8 - 3
    Rur 4 - 8
    Ind 9 - 3
    SSA 8 - 9
      112 - 140
           
2A vs CL W - L
    7A 3 - 6
    6A 15 - 7
    5A 10 - 5
    4A 14 - 13
    3A 18 - 15
    1A 16 - 24
    Rur 11 - 10
    Ind 5 - 3
    SSA 11 - 11
      103 - 94
           
1A vs CL W - L
    7A 4 - 2
    6A 2 - 1
    5A 5 - 4
    4A 6 - 9
    3A 3 - 8
    2A 24 - 16
    Rur 10 - 6
    Ind 12 - 7
    SSA 23 - 13
      89 - 66
           
Rur vs CL W - L
    7A 2 - 1
    6A 3 - 1
    5A 2 - 4
    4A 1 - 2
    3A 8 - 4
    2A 10 - 11
    1A 6 - 10
    Ind 6 - 2
    SSA 14 - 14
      52 - 49
           
Ind vs CL W - L
    7A 6 - 15
    6A 2 - 9
    5A 1 - 9
    4A 3 - 6
    3A 3 - 9
    2A 3 - 5
    1A 7 - 12
    Rur 2 - 6
    SSA 6 - 19
      33 - 90
           
SSA vs CL W - L
    7A 3 - 3
    6A 1 - 1
    5A 2 - 0
    4A 5 - 3
    3A 9 - 8
    2A 11 - 11
    1A 13 - 23
    Rur 14 - 14
    Ind 19 - 6
      77 - 69

 


Posted
59 minutes ago, nolebull813 said:

I like it. Rural proving they don’t need their special own little class. The main thing I get from all this, is there is way too many classes. 

Don't need 7A as well as they have a losing record against 4A, 5A & 6A.  

Posted
1 hour ago, nolebull813 said:

I like it. Rural proving they don’t need their special own little class. The main thing I get from all this, is there is way too many classes. 

While there may be too many classes, the main takeaway is that school enrollment is not a predictor of success on the field, and therefore school enrollment should not be the basis for classification.  Fix the classification process (if you want more balanced and equitable competition), and then you can adjust the number of classes to whatever number suits your fancy.    

Posted

This is just a tiny sample guys. I’ve kept similar data going back to the early 2000’s. 
i have it year by year for roughly 20+ years. It’s always the same. Thousands of games. Whether we have 6 classifications or 8. The bigger schools win 53% and the smaller 47%. Mark Cannon can testify. When I raise this point, it gets swept under the carpet and the next thing you know, we have more classifications. Of course some whiners then start arguing about Private vs Public. Sure, there are powerhouse private schools. But the fact is there are many Private schools that are just not good. Public schools are the same way. Some annual powerhouses but also many that aren’t good either.  In my mind, there should be no more than four classifications and then the SSAA as a fifth option.  The best format we’ve had for balanced competitiveness was a few years ago (Metro/Suburban). I have data that supports this. 

Posted

Yes, the records by themselves are somewhat out of context. Because powerhouses in the small classes can beat the tar out of average to below average large schools.

No one ever cries when the public’s beat the privates. The outrage only goes in one direction.

i remember a 2nd round loser in rural beat the 2A private school state champ. No one said a word. Countless of examples. 
 

They need to cut the classes to 5, and have an open championship for any team who gets 5-7 NET (agree on a number) of football transfers. Emphasis on net. Because if you lose 10 guys, 5 isn’t really doing as much as if you lost no one. 
 

If you don’t like it, go to the SSAA or independent. Let stop the participation trophies and watered down blowouts 

Posted

Taking a look back to last season, there were 1540 interclass games played which I will show below. I decided to take a closer look at the games between Classes 1A thru 7A because outside of that it's difficult to determine school size. There are many independent schools that are very large. I took all the schools from 1A to 6A (Obviously no school from 7A is included) who beat larger schools from higher classifications, and this is what I found:

In 2024 there were 360 schools in Classes 1A - 6A. Of that group, 228 "different" schools (63%) beat at least one team from a higher classification. This is a sure sign that there are way too many classifications. That number should be less than half of that.  Also, I have a list of those 228 schools and who they beat from higher classifications if anyone wants to see it.

Anyway, here are the numbers from 2024. (1540 interclass games)

7A vs CL W - L
    6A 50 - 52
    5A 24 - 29
    4A 31 - 31
    3A 19 - 20
    2A 13 - 12
    1A 5 - 6
    Rur 1 - 5
    Ind 27 - 8
    SSA 4 - 3
      174 - 166
           
6A vs CL W - L
    7A 52 - 50
    5A 48 - 40
    4A 42 - 33
    3A 28 - 22
    2A 13 - 18
    1A 9 - 6
    Rur 2 - 5
    Ind 10 - 6
    SSA 1 - 1
      205 - 181
           
5A vs CL W - L
    7A 29 - 24
    6A 40 - 48
    4A 36 - 37
    3A 50 - 33
    2A 17 - 19
    1A 7 - 8
    Rur 3 - 4
    Ind 11 - 4
    SSA 2 - 1
      195 - 178
           
4A vs CL W - L
    7A 31 - 31
    6A 33 - 42
    5A 37 - 36
    3A 55 - 31
    2A 23 - 26
    1A 8 - 14
    Rur 5 - 2
    Ind 10 - 8
    SSA 7 - 5
      209 - 195
           
3A vs CL W - L
    7A 20 - 19
    6A 22 - 28
    5A 33 - 50
    4A 31 - 55
    2A 24 - 28
    1A 19 - 6
    Rur 8 - 11
    Ind 9 - 11
    SSA 9 - 9
      175 - 217
           
2A vs CL W - L
    7A 12 - 13
    6A 18 - 13
    5A 19 - 17
    4A 26 - 23
    3A 28 - 24
    1A 33 - 24
    Rur 25 - 17
    Ind 11 - 8
    SSA 10 - 16
      182 - 155
           
1A vs CL W - L
    7A 6 - 5
    6A 6 - 9
    5A 8 - 7
    4A 14 - 8
    3A 6 - 19
    2A 24 - 33
    Rur 9 - 17
    Ind 26 - 18
    SSA 27 - 20
      126 - 136
           
Rur vs CL W - L
    7A 5 - 1
    6A 5 - 2
    5A 4 - 3
    4A 2 - 5
    3A 11 - 8
    2A 17 - 25
    1A 17 - 9
    Ind 13 - 6
    SSA 19 - 15
      93 - 74
           
Ind vs CL W - L
    7A 8 - 27
    6A 6 - 10
    5A 4 - 11
    4A 8 - 10
    3A 11 - 9
    2A 8 - 11
    1A 18 - 26
    Rur 6 - 13
    SSA 14 - 28
      83 - 145
           
SSA vs CL W - L
    7A 3 - 4
    6A 1 - 1
    5A 1 - 2
    4A 5 - 7
    3A 9 - 9
    2A 16 - 10
    1A 20 - 27
    Rur 15 - 19
    Ind 28 - 14
      98 - 93
Posted

The 2 hardest things keeping Florida from cutting down the classes like they should are the FHSAA, because more brackets means more gate money from extra playoff games. And the coaches/AD’s who want an easier road. Coaches and AD’s are going to want the path to least resistance because it’s job security and legacy on the line. Hell they would probably all be for more classes! 
 

The only positive I can find is the extra games with there being extra brackets is more exposure for kids for college. 
 

The negative is it makes a lot more wasted blowouts and teams advancing further than they ever would if the brackets were trimmed down like they are supposed to be.

So bottom line is the extra exposure for kids worth the poor product and wasted blowouts?

Posted
2 hours ago, LAZ said:

 

Anyway, here are the numbers from 2024. (1540 interclass games)

7A vs CL W - L
           
      174 - 166
           
6A vs CL W - L
           
      205 - 181
           
5A vs CL W - L
           
      195 - 178
           
4A vs CL W - L
           
      209 - 195
           
3A vs CL W - L
           
      175 - 217
           
2A vs CL W - L
           
      182 - 155
           
1A vs CL W - L
           
      126 - 136
           
           

Since there is no statistically significant difference in the 2024 won-loss records of the 7 classes (by chi-square test), it implies that there are "good", "average", and "mediocre" teams within each class.  The first step to achieve competitive balance is to redistribute all the "good" teams into their own classes, the "average" teams into their own classes, and the "mediocre" teams into their own classes; either by past performance, computer rankings, promotion/relegation or, however.  Florida actually has more teams per class than just about any state besides Texas and California.  And for the reasons @nolebull813  correctly points out, the likelihood of the FHSAA reducing the number of classes is basically zero.  So let's at least try to be realistic, and move away from the enrollment-based classifications to improve competitive equity, which in the long run would be much better for the health of Florida high school football.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


×
×
  • Create New...