Jump to content

Pahokee/Cocoa


Tiger86

Recommended Posts

I found this over on Max Preps.

2008     12-3-0    State Champion 2B
2007     14-0-0    State Champion 2B
2006     13-0-0    State Champion 2B
2004     14-1-0    State Champion 2B
2003     State Champion 2B
1989     State Champion 2A

Like you said a Champion is a Champion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


10 hours ago, Proseteye said:

Also, Pahokee doesn't recruit. Who the hell would want to transfer to the muck.

Lol...You got that right. There are no Malls, Strip Malls, Movie theaters, Arcades, or fast food restaurants in Pahokee.

There is nothing else to do but play football.

On a serious note...The Pahokee kids seem to work very hard, they play with a big chip on their shoulder. And they love being the underdog.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the Chip that teams need to watch out for. It can make a kid set goals, work extra hard, play as a unit, knowing they have to prove something to themselves, and prove to the other teams they got what it takes. 

Like Tiger said, there are only 11 players on the field when the ball is snapped. 

Cocoa better be ready... this is going to be better than the Bartram game was. I would say more like Trinity CA with some Viera thrown in.  

Who wants it more? Will it go down to the last snap? I'm excited to see this one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Classes 2A and 2B migrated to Class 3A in 2011. Class 3A replaced both 2A and 2B classes which were eliminated. Also, most of the previous 3A teams migrated to 4A. So, effectively teams in 2A and 2B were playing 3A ball all along. The new 3A was just an administrative change and not a change that denoted enhanced technical ability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Proseteye said:

Classes 2A and 2B migrated to Class 3A in 2011. Class 3A replaced both 2A and 2B classes which were eliminated. Also, most of the previous 3A teams migrated to 4A. So, effectively teams in 2A and 2B were playing 3A ball all along. The new 3A was just an administrative change and not a change that denoted enhanced technical ability.

Glades Central is another good team out of that area. They have 6 championships to there name in 3 & 4 A, too. They're currently just out of the playoff pairings by 0.03 pts, behind Gulliver Prep. And they have Pahokee the week after Cocoa in a rivalry game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may leave the Viera vs.South Fork game after the first few series if it starts to get ugly.(Joe P. should have Viera favored 62) and head North to Cocoa to check this out.  I love what Pahokee players bring to the table.  However, everybody needs to slow down, Pk will struggle on this road trip, but will then win their rival game against GC.

Cocoa 41 Pahokee 13

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Mustangs78 said:

I may leave the Viera vs.South Fork game after the first few series if it starts to get ugly.(Joe P. should have Viera favored 62) and head North to Cocoa to check this out.  I love what Pahokee players bring to the table.  However, everybody needs to slow down, Pk will struggle on this road trip, but will then win their rival game against GC.

Cocoa 41 Pahokee 13

41-13? Why do you consider the game to be a blowout?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the Palm Beach Post (They always pick against Pahokee..in-county or out-of county, until the finals) LOL!

No. 2 Pahokee (6-1) at Cocoa (7-0): The Tigers, who are the reigning Class 4A champions and the No. 1 team in this week’s Associated Press poll, have dispatched everyone they’ve played this year, including state-ranked teams like Jacksonville-Trinity Christian, Daytona Beach-Mainland, Viera and St. John’s-Bartram Trail. The Blue Devils have won five straight, but Cocoa could easily end that streak.

Jodie: Cocoa 27-13; Adam: Cocoa 28-14

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MuckCityChamp said:

Nobody really is. Even the podcast yesterday on this website spoke about Cocoa vs Rockledge like the game against Pahokee really doesn't exist. 

It's not that it doesn't exist. The game is a factor for points, but Rockledge has been a surprise this year and we had to throw that out there because points on that game are going to matter now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Joshua Wilson said:

It's not that it doesn't exist. The game is a factor for points, but Rockledge has been a surprise this year and we had to throw that out there because points on that game are going to matter now.

Should of consulted me on Rockledge. :) They will win district easily and will give Cocoa a better game then Pahokee. Cocoa 35- Pahokee 14. 

Rockledge  26   Cocoa 28

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Original1 said:

From what I gathered. Cocoa is not big on passing the ball.

I think "lil old" Pahokee may surprise a lot of you tonight. Don't say I didn't warn you.

Hawkins isn't your average back. Didn't score on Viera but broke off a half dozen huge gains. Doubt Pahokee has team speed on defense to prevent the long td runs over an entire game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Bamarod said:

Hawkins isn't your average back. Didn't score on Viera but broke off a half dozen huge gains. Doubt Pahokee has team speed on defense to prevent the long td runs over an entire game.

Team speed is Pahokee's strength. That's all they do have. Pass coverage seems to be Pahokee's weakness this year. Sounds like they don't have to worry about that tonight because Cocoa doesn't throw the ball.

How is the Hawkins kid, compared to Vero's RB (Dixon)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Original1 said:

Team speed is Pahokee's strength. That's all they do have. Pass coverage seems to be Pahokee's weakness this year. Sounds like they don't have to worry about that tonight because Cocoa doesn't throw the ball.

How is the Hawkins kid, compared to Vero's RB (Dixon)?

Obviously, someone hasn't done their homework on Pahokee, if he thinks that they don't have any team speed. Hawkins and Dixon (Vero's RB) are night and day comparisons. Dixon is a downhill, thumper, that lacks the long end speed. While Hawkins  is a big play waiting to happen in the pass or run game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, 561_Fan said:

Obviously, someone hasn't done their homework on Pahokee, if he thinks that they don't have any team speed. Hawkins and Dixon (Vero's RB) are night and day comparisons. Dixon is a downhill, thumper, that lacks the long end speed. While Hawkins  is a big play waiting to happen in the pass or run game. 

This^ Dixon will run you over before trying to side-step you, and will get better results. Hawkins is elite speed and vision,can break one on any play. Any high school team would love to have either one. Against Viera, I thought Hawkins more impressive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Original1 said:

Team speed is Pahokee's strength. That's all they do have. Pass coverage seems to be Pahokee's weakness this year. Sounds like they don't have to worry about that tonight because Cocoa doesn't throw the ball.

How is the Hawkins kid, compared to Vero's RB (Dixon)?

Meant more from a depth standpoint on speed. Just considering roster size, Hawkins can score in 4th as much as in 1st quarter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Bamarod said:

Meant more from a depth standpoint on speed. Just considering roster size, Hawkins can score in 4th as much as in 1st quarter.

This is one of the deeper Pahokee teams. No skill players play both ways, and they rotate lineman so they're fresh all game. Outside of West Park Prep (home coming) every opponent has been a 6/7/8A team, and Pahokee has worn them down by the fourth....Except Seminole Ridge because Pahokee was sloppy the first half, but they held Ridge scoreless from the second quarter to 1 min in the fourth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...



  • Posts

    • Agree with what you think mostly, except I'd use a 4 year average and only move the top team in each region up and bottom team in each region down based on that average. I think 4 years gives a better overall picture of a program.
    • What this means is we will soon see one of two scenarios play out in the coming years: 1) A subset of students will eventually not be able to attend a "good" school because there is simply no space for them due to there being a scarcity of "good" schools 2) Assuming compulsory attendance remains a thing, we will see longtime elite private high schools nosedive in performance. The schools can not perform magic: unmotivated, unprepared often defiant students will NOT be good students no matter what the school does/doesn't do. And oftentimes these sorts of students do have parents who will do the absolute bare minimum needed to get the kid into a private school through the new rules. Anyone who genuinely believes that the schools with higher test scores automatically do a better job of teaching the kids than schools with lower scores is an imbecile. 
    • Here’s a scenario that will cook your noodle. There’s an 11th grader at a D rated public school. Lives in a bad neighborhood with a single mom and a bunch of siblings. Dirt poor, and struggle just to eat and keep the lights on. He can’t get a part time job to help out because he has to watch his little siblings while his mom works.    The school he plays for has poor attendance at the football games, and is always bad. He is a super star for them and tons of new bandwagon fans start to attend the games because they are good and he is the reason. School is making tons of new money.    Season is over. Back to reality for him. School year is over. Summer hits. Some “runner” on behalf of the rich local private school “offers” his mom, him, and all his siblings a way out of poverty. New place to live, food on the table, and an opportunity to get a quality education and maximize exposure for all the top colleges to see. A once in a lifetime opportunity to get his family out of poverty. What say you? Does he say no and continue to barely survive, or does he take the deal? 
    • To make it short and sweet. I am against breaking the rules. If there is a rule that seems outdated or unfair then it should be amended/changed/repealed with majority rule 
    • I am a huge proponent of innocent until proven guilty, and due process with credible evidence. I support a credible investigation, and not some witch hunt by disgruntled folks both near and far from the program. Let’s hope they can get to the bottom of this quickly 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...