Jump to content

Throwback


DisabledAccount

Recommended Posts

http://www.nfhsnetwork.com/events/columbia-high-school-lake-city-fl/6db9905255

 

 

Columbia vs Gainesville softball 

 

2017 7A regional semifinals 

 

 

Synopsis:

 

Heading into this game Columbia was coming off a win over Creekside who had ended their season back in 2014. Gainesville was coming off defeating Bartram Trail 

 

During the season Columbia lost to Gainesville at home but then defeated Gainesville on the road and in the district championship held in Middleburg which had Columbia with a 2-1 edge heading into this game 

 

Columbia however was eliminated from the playoffs in the same round in 2016 and was the only team to score a run on Gainesville during their playoff road to winning state

 

 

 

Result:

 

Columbia fell behind 6-0 and would stay behind 6-0 before scoring 4 runs in the 5th to make it 6-4 trailing and another in 6th to make it 6-5

 

Gainesville would load bases in top of 7th and get a run to make lead 7-5 heading into bottom of 7th

 

With 2 outs Columbia would get a 2rbi triple to tie the game and a wild pitch would lead to runner on third scoring a walk off steal of home plate

 

 

Definitely a game worth watching if you haven't already 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

Announcements



  • Posts

    • Agree with what you think mostly, except I'd use a 4 year average and only move the top team in each region up and bottom team in each region down based on that average. I think 4 years gives a better overall picture of a program.
    • What this means is we will soon see one of two scenarios play out in the coming years: 1) A subset of students will eventually not be able to attend a "good" school because there is simply no space for them due to there being a scarcity of "good" schools 2) Assuming compulsory attendance remains a thing, we will see longtime elite private high schools nosedive in performance. The schools can not perform magic: unmotivated, unprepared often defiant students will NOT be good students no matter what the school does/doesn't do. And oftentimes these sorts of students do have parents who will do the absolute bare minimum needed to get the kid into a private school through the new rules. Anyone who genuinely believes that the schools with higher test scores automatically do a better job of teaching the kids than schools with lower scores is an imbecile. 
    • Here’s a scenario that will cook your noodle. There’s an 11th grader at a D rated public school. Lives in a bad neighborhood with a single mom and a bunch of siblings. Dirt poor, and struggle just to eat and keep the lights on. He can’t get a part time job to help out because he has to watch his little siblings while his mom works.    The school he plays for has poor attendance at the football games, and is always bad. He is a super star for them and tons of new bandwagon fans start to attend the games because they are good and he is the reason. School is making tons of new money.    Season is over. Back to reality for him. School year is over. Summer hits. Some “runner” on behalf of the rich local private school “offers” his mom, him, and all his siblings a way out of poverty. New place to live, food on the table, and an opportunity to get a quality education and maximize exposure for all the top colleges to see. A once in a lifetime opportunity to get his family out of poverty. What say you? Does he say no and continue to barely survive, or does he take the deal? 
    • To make it short and sweet. I am against breaking the rules. If there is a rule that seems outdated or unfair then it should be amended/changed/repealed with majority rule 
    • I am a huge proponent of innocent until proven guilty, and due process with credible evidence. I support a credible investigation, and not some witch hunt by disgruntled folks both near and far from the program. Let’s hope they can get to the bottom of this quickly 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...