Jump to content

Another team possibly in trouble


DB4

Recommended Posts

I don't want to say who yet, but there's a large school in South Florida that is rumored to have played a bunch of kids that were ineligible and could get in trouble for it and wind up having the coach fired. Be on the lookout, especially with the playoffs coming up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


28 minutes ago, DB4 said:

I don't want to say who yet, but there's a large school in South Florida that is rumored to have played a bunch of kids that were ineligible and could get in trouble for it and wind up having the coach fired. Be on the lookout, especially with the playoffs coming up.

Classification? 

 

I'm mainly just asking if it anyone in 7a

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Floridatech said:

SNITCHIIIINNNNNN

BTW a snitch aka rat is somebody who does something wrong but snitches on others who are doing things wrong… If a team is cheating then they are cheating… A thief is a thief a murderer a murderer and a cheater is a cheater no way around it… Maybe its an accidental breaking of the rules? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, WhatsUpDoc said:

BTW a snitch aka rat is somebody who does something wrong but snitches on others who are doing things wrong… If a team is cheating then they are cheating… A thief is a thief a murderer a murderer and a cheater is a cheater no way around it… Maybe its an accidental breaking of the rules? 

And snitchin is snitchin but if it's an accidental then it's an accidental if the other team gets a transfer then the other team got one too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A "Snitch' turned in the girls at Bartow MS, and possibly prevented a 10 year-old girl from being stabbed & eaten.

Can't stand it when people use the word "snitch" with disdain, because they think it's okay to break rules as long as you're scary enough to keep people from turning you in.  You're not making the world a better place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


  • Posts

    • Agree with what you think mostly, except I'd use a 4 year average and only move the top team in each region up and bottom team in each region down based on that average. I think 4 years gives a better overall picture of a program.
    • What this means is we will soon see one of two scenarios play out in the coming years: 1) A subset of students will eventually not be able to attend a "good" school because there is simply no space for them due to there being a scarcity of "good" schools 2) Assuming compulsory attendance remains a thing, we will see longtime elite private high schools nosedive in performance. The schools can not perform magic: unmotivated, unprepared often defiant students will NOT be good students no matter what the school does/doesn't do. And oftentimes these sorts of students do have parents who will do the absolute bare minimum needed to get the kid into a private school through the new rules. Anyone who genuinely believes that the schools with higher test scores automatically do a better job of teaching the kids than schools with lower scores is an imbecile. 
    • Here’s a scenario that will cook your noodle. There’s an 11th grader at a D rated public school. Lives in a bad neighborhood with a single mom and a bunch of siblings. Dirt poor, and struggle just to eat and keep the lights on. He can’t get a part time job to help out because he has to watch his little siblings while his mom works.    The school he plays for has poor attendance at the football games, and is always bad. He is a super star for them and tons of new bandwagon fans start to attend the games because they are good and he is the reason. School is making tons of new money.    Season is over. Back to reality for him. School year is over. Summer hits. Some “runner” on behalf of the rich local private school “offers” his mom, him, and all his siblings a way out of poverty. New place to live, food on the table, and an opportunity to get a quality education and maximize exposure for all the top colleges to see. A once in a lifetime opportunity to get his family out of poverty. What say you? Does he say no and continue to barely survive, or does he take the deal? 
    • To make it short and sweet. I am against breaking the rules. If there is a rule that seems outdated or unfair then it should be amended/changed/repealed with majority rule 
    • I am a huge proponent of innocent until proven guilty, and due process with credible evidence. I support a credible investigation, and not some witch hunt by disgruntled folks both near and far from the program. Let’s hope they can get to the bottom of this quickly 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...