Jump to content

DILLARD HIGH 2019 FOOTBALL SCHEDULE!!


THIS_IS_DILLARD

Recommended Posts


very weak schedule. Combined record last year 41-67. I know a lot are district games and you have to play them but other than Deerfield and Miramar no one else stands out.  Pahokee is a solid 1A team but should not be on Dillards level.

 

Here is the record of each team and maxpreps rankings

great game

DEERFIELD(HOME) 12-2 18

good games

MIRAMAR(HOME) 6-5 64

ok games

PIPER (HOME) 6-5 110

PAHOKEE(AWAY) 6-6 154

 

These teams combined 11-49 record

BOYD ANDERSON(HOME) 4-6 264

ELY (AWAY) 1-9 275

STRANAHAN (HOME) 1-9 288

ARCHBISHOP MCCARTHY (AWAY) 2-8 383

HOLLYWOOD HILLS (HOME) 2-8 410

NORTHEAST (AWAY) 1-9 456

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, badbird said:

very weak schedule. Combined record last year 41-67. I know a lot are district games and you have to play them but other than Deerfield and Miramar no one else stands out.  Pahokee is a solid 1A team but should not be on Dillards level.

 

Here is the record of each team and maxpreps rankings

great game

DEERFIELD(HOME) 12-2 18

good games

MIRAMAR(HOME) 6-5 64

ok games

PIPER (HOME) 6-5 110

PAHOKEE(AWAY) 6-6 154

 

These teams combined 11-49 record

BOYD ANDERSON(HOME) 4-6 264

ELY (AWAY) 1-9 275

STRANAHAN (HOME) 1-9 288

ARCHBISHOP MCCARTHY (AWAY) 2-8 383

HOLLYWOOD HILLS (HOME) 2-8 410

NORTHEAST (AWAY) 1-9 456

 

I agree we can’t forget about style points i

know that lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, badbird said:

I'm not sure what Dillard has returning and they have a new coach but I could see 9-1 

When I look at our schedule I see Northeast archbishop and boys Anderson as district games can’t do anything about that. 

Ely one of the most instense rival games dating back to the 40s both alumni bases would act a plum fool you try to cut that game.

 

Piper ...haven’t played them in years so I’m surprised at this one. 

Stranahan we’ve been plying them every year for the past 8+ years another inner City rival game. 

Miramar - solid game wasn’t he patriots are always tough 

Deerfield a big heavy weight matchup between a 8A favorite. 

Pahokee even tho their in 1A they have shown they can compete with anyone ..always did to.

Hollywood Hills this had to be a 2 year contract similar to when we played booker t two consecutive years. 

Overall not a daunting schedule but for where Dillard is ranked it’s solid. Plus with how the districts changed this off season Dillard can possibly get a favorable 1st and second round matchup. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 4/5/2019 at 12:58 PM, badbird said:

I'm not sure what Dillard has returning and they have a new coach but I could see 9-1 

9-1????? 

I think  7-3 

Don't sleep on Pahokee! They are not Boynton Beach by a long shot. 

I think its going to be a fun match up between the  two teams... but siding with im Pahokee.

Beside.....Dillard doesn't have a great record against teams in the Muck

 

Dillard has to prove me wrong 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/4/2019 at 11:10 AM, THIS_IS_DILLARD said:

*Dates are to be confirmed. 

PAHOKEE(AWAY)

DEERFIELD(HOME)

MIRAMAR(HOME)

BOYD ANDERSON(HOME)

HOLLYWOOD HILLS (HOME)

STRANAHAN (HOME)

NORTHEAST (AWAY)

ARCHBISHOP MCCARTHY (AWAY)

ELY (AWAY)

PIPER (HOME)

GOOOOO PANTHERS!!

 

I was hoping to see them play Western and Gibbons again, maybe even Chaminade.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SFL SPY said:

I was hoping to see them play Western and Gibbons again, maybe even Chaminade.

 

Me to but playing them didn’t get us any points atleast scheduling PAHOKEE && Deerfield && Miramar all three have chances to win over 7 games that’s alot of playoff points plus all 3 of those teams made the playoffs last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, A-Town561 said:

9-1????? 

I think  7-3 

Don't sleep on Pahokee! They are not Boynton Beach by a long shot. 

I think its going to be a fun match up between the  two teams... but siding with im Pahokee.

Beside.....Dillard doesn't have a great record against teams in the Muck

 

Dillard has to prove me wrong 

 I didn't say they would go 9-1.  I said they could as a best case scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, A-Town561 said:

9-1????? 

I think  7-3 

Don't sleep on Pahokee! They are not Boynton Beach by a long shot. 

I think its going to be a fun match up between the  two teams... but siding with im Pahokee.

Beside.....Dillard doesn't have a great record against teams in the Muck

 

Dillard has to prove me wrong 

Dillard && glades central use to have a lot of great matchups back in the day but I’m with you I’ll be shocked Af if we’re 9-1 with that schedule. PAHOKEE will be a dog fight home or away. Plus with that bunny rabbit chasing speed they have the athletic ability to run Dillard off the field if their not solid coached.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 5/8/2019 at 10:08 PM, THIS_IS_DILLARD said:

Dillard && glades central use to have a lot of great matchups back in the day but I’m with you I’ll be shocked Af if we’re 9-1 with that schedule. PAHOKEE will be a dog fight home or away. Plus with that bunny rabbit chasing speed they have the athletic ability to run Dillard off the field if their not solid coached.

We will see Dillard

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
On 5/8/2019 at 10:29 AM, A-Town561 said:

9-1????? 

I think  7-3 

Don't sleep on Pahokee! They are not Boynton Beach by a long shot. 

I think its going to be a fun match up between the  two teams... but siding with im Pahokee.

Beside.....Dillard doesn't have a great record against teams in the Muck

 

Dillard has to prove me wrong 

Weeeellllll lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
3 minutes ago, THIS_IS_DILLARD said:

Yea we played better the team who put 49 on them in the state semis the year before lol ...so much for that 7-3 record tho lol ..but aye we stay humble over here & take it 1 game at a time 

That ain't the same team unless you are UCF and use transitive property from different years.  Deerfield would have been a good game.  Too bad it was canceled.  Oh well old news good luck vs Miami Central.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, badbird said:

That ain't the same team unless you are UCF and use transitive property from different years.  Deerfield would have been a good game.  Too bad it was canceled.  Oh well old news good luck vs Miami Central.   

U right old news but how I see it Parrish is still there their defense is still there..their in the 3rd Round for the chance to get back to states just like Deerfield seem to me at this point u wouldn’t have went wrong with either matchup. But aye on yo the regional finals. I can’t remember what team u support but if their still in it good luck hope y’all win it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, THIS_IS_DILLARD said:

U right old news but how I see it Parrish is still there their defense is still there..their in the 3rd Round for the chance to get back to states just like Deerfield seem to me at this point u wouldn’t have went wrong with either matchup. But aye on yo the regional finals. I can’t remember what team u support but if their still in it good luck hope y’all win it. 

I have no team anymore.  Just a fan.  I will be at the Apopka vs Seminole game this week.  I hope for a good game and may the best team win.  I considered Lakeland vs Armwood. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


  • Posts

    • Agree with what you think mostly, except I'd use a 4 year average and only move the top team in each region up and bottom team in each region down based on that average. I think 4 years gives a better overall picture of a program.
    • What this means is we will soon see one of two scenarios play out in the coming years: 1) A subset of students will eventually not be able to attend a "good" school because there is simply no space for them due to there being a scarcity of "good" schools 2) Assuming compulsory attendance remains a thing, we will see longtime elite private high schools nosedive in performance. The schools can not perform magic: unmotivated, unprepared often defiant students will NOT be good students no matter what the school does/doesn't do. And oftentimes these sorts of students do have parents who will do the absolute bare minimum needed to get the kid into a private school through the new rules. Anyone who genuinely believes that the schools with higher test scores automatically do a better job of teaching the kids than schools with lower scores is an imbecile. 
    • Here’s a scenario that will cook your noodle. There’s an 11th grader at a D rated public school. Lives in a bad neighborhood with a single mom and a bunch of siblings. Dirt poor, and struggle just to eat and keep the lights on. He can’t get a part time job to help out because he has to watch his little siblings while his mom works.    The school he plays for has poor attendance at the football games, and is always bad. He is a super star for them and tons of new bandwagon fans start to attend the games because they are good and he is the reason. School is making tons of new money.    Season is over. Back to reality for him. School year is over. Summer hits. Some “runner” on behalf of the rich local private school “offers” his mom, him, and all his siblings a way out of poverty. New place to live, food on the table, and an opportunity to get a quality education and maximize exposure for all the top colleges to see. A once in a lifetime opportunity to get his family out of poverty. What say you? Does he say no and continue to barely survive, or does he take the deal? 
    • To make it short and sweet. I am against breaking the rules. If there is a rule that seems outdated or unfair then it should be amended/changed/repealed with majority rule 
    • I am a huge proponent of innocent until proven guilty, and due process with credible evidence. I support a credible investigation, and not some witch hunt by disgruntled folks both near and far from the program. Let’s hope they can get to the bottom of this quickly 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...