Jump to content

Gators!!!


muckboy561

Recommended Posts


21 minutes ago, muckboy561 said:

How bout them UF Gators!!!!!

Thank God for UF's D-line. Franks looked like the Franks of old; not like the Franks in the last 4 games of last season. OL has a long way to go; running game was non-existent. It looks like Manny Diaz is doing well at rebuilding the U. Hopefully, Gators will resuscitate against UT-Martin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, HornetFan said:

Thank God for UF's D-line. Franks looked like the Franks of old; not like the Franks in the last 4 games of last season. OL has a long way to go; running game was non-existent. It looks like Manny Diaz is doing well at rebuilding the U. Hopefully, Gators will resuscitate against UT-Martin.

I know we almost gave the game away

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad UF won.  And I'm glad Florida started out with Miami.  If the Gators had started out with a D2 directional team, I think we all would have gotten a false impression of both their strengths and their weaknesses.  That said, on the offensive side of the ball, Toney (a/k/a Percy Harvin 2.0) is a play maker.  Franks both scares me and excites me.  Florida's ground game needs work.  But they made some plays when then had to.  On the defensive side, the D-line was impressive (excitement tempered by the knowledge that Miami's O-Line is young and inexperienced).  LB's had an average night.  DB's got a little too aggressive at the end of the game, but I'd rather try to tone down an aggressive player than be forced to make an aggressive player out of a timid one.  Special teams look sound.  The Gators may be back to the days where it all comes down to the Florida/Georgia game to decide who plays in the SEC Championship game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, HornetFan said:

First game jitters. Good to have it out of the way and UT-Martin game should help.

UF could beat UT-Martin by 50 and it wouldn't prove them as a top 10 team nationally

 

UF needs to do more than beat up on a program trying to work itself up the ladder to prove themselves as being a championship contender which is what i personally feel top 10 should be reserved for

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, ColumbiaHighFan2017class said:

UF could beat UT-Martin by 50 and it wouldn't prove them as a top 10 team nationally

 

UF needs to do more than beat up on a program trying to work itself up the ladder to prove themselves as being a championship contender which is what i personally feel top 10 should be reserved for

Well lets hope FSU does as well or better against Boise State. I believe 38 or what ever they are ranked is the worse I've seen since the mid 80's. 

UCF starts out at 17... who would have ever thought that they are higher ranked than UM or FSU to start the year?

What in OZ is going on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/27/2019 at 10:48 AM, ColumbiaHighFan2017class said:

UF was fortunate that Miami offensive line was hot garbage because if Miami could have at least had a average OL they win that game

 

UF definitely got some work to do, i would have them ranked around 15-25 range in country

 

Not top 10 like many polls have them

Might want to worry about the joke in Doak instead of analyzing the Gators and Canes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


  • Posts

    • Agree with what you think mostly, except I'd use a 4 year average and only move the top team in each region up and bottom team in each region down based on that average. I think 4 years gives a better overall picture of a program.
    • What this means is we will soon see one of two scenarios play out in the coming years: 1) A subset of students will eventually not be able to attend a "good" school because there is simply no space for them due to there being a scarcity of "good" schools 2) Assuming compulsory attendance remains a thing, we will see longtime elite private high schools nosedive in performance. The schools can not perform magic: unmotivated, unprepared often defiant students will NOT be good students no matter what the school does/doesn't do. And oftentimes these sorts of students do have parents who will do the absolute bare minimum needed to get the kid into a private school through the new rules. Anyone who genuinely believes that the schools with higher test scores automatically do a better job of teaching the kids than schools with lower scores is an imbecile. 
    • Here’s a scenario that will cook your noodle. There’s an 11th grader at a D rated public school. Lives in a bad neighborhood with a single mom and a bunch of siblings. Dirt poor, and struggle just to eat and keep the lights on. He can’t get a part time job to help out because he has to watch his little siblings while his mom works.    The school he plays for has poor attendance at the football games, and is always bad. He is a super star for them and tons of new bandwagon fans start to attend the games because they are good and he is the reason. School is making tons of new money.    Season is over. Back to reality for him. School year is over. Summer hits. Some “runner” on behalf of the rich local private school “offers” his mom, him, and all his siblings a way out of poverty. New place to live, food on the table, and an opportunity to get a quality education and maximize exposure for all the top colleges to see. A once in a lifetime opportunity to get his family out of poverty. What say you? Does he say no and continue to barely survive, or does he take the deal? 
    • To make it short and sweet. I am against breaking the rules. If there is a rule that seems outdated or unfair then it should be amended/changed/repealed with majority rule 
    • I am a huge proponent of innocent until proven guilty, and due process with credible evidence. I support a credible investigation, and not some witch hunt by disgruntled folks both near and far from the program. Let’s hope they can get to the bottom of this quickly 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...