Jump to content

Question for Josh


badbird

Recommended Posts


5 minutes ago, ColumbiaHighFan2017class said:

Shut up LMAO

 

I actually dropped Chaminade to low 20s in my poll 

I can’t ask a question?  They lost and only fell one spot.  I need to know why because they are a pick em game and I know nothing about them other than they acquire players like the Yankees acquire  free agents

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, badbird said:

I can’t ask a question?  They lost and only fell one spot.  I need to know why because they are a pick em game and I know nothing about them other than they acquire players like the Yankees acquire  free agents

Sure you can

 

I was giving that response because of that little comment about me doing the rankings even though I have a much different placement in my rankings for Chaminade lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, badbird said:

I can’t ask a question?  They lost and only fell one spot.  I need to know why because they are a pick em game and I know nothing about them other than they acquire players like the Yankees acquire  free agents

They have some talent but are not as strong overall as the team last year if it helps

 

I actually picked Atlantic to beat Chaminade

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, badbird said:

Or did you pick them because they play Columbia.  I got to figure this out. 

3 reasons for my pick

 

1 Atlantic is a larger school and should have depth advantage

 

2 Chaminade isn't as strong as team from last year

 

3 Atlantic may very well be strongest team in PBC and from what I saw of them they looked pretty damn good

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ColumbiaHighFan2017class said:

3 reasons for my pick

 

1 Atlantic is a larger school and should have depth advantage

 

2 Chaminade isn't as strong as team from last year

 

3 Atlantic may very well be strongest team in PBC and from what I saw of them they looked pretty damn good

I picked them too but have no idea why.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, badbird said:

how does Chaminade stay ranked #7 when they lost to #22 this week?  Was somebody hurt?  Is columbiafan doing your rankings?

The reason I didn't drop them that much is because after looking at everything, it was very evident the officials played a significant role in the outcome of the game. I am not 100% sold on Carol City. If they lose to Atlantic that is certainly going to drop them further, but I can't fully justify a full drop after something that was not decided on the field. Carol City is struggling up and down and really I feel Chaminade-Madonna is the better team still. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Joshua Wilson said:

The reason I didn't drop them that much is because after looking at everything, it was very evident the officials played a significant role in the outcome of the game. I am not 100% sold on Carol City. If they lose to Atlantic that is certainly going to drop them further, but I can't fully justify a full drop after something that was not decided on the field. Carol City is struggling up and down and really I feel Chaminade-Madonna is the better team still. 

Interesting.  I'd be interested to hear you elaborate on how the officials played a significant role in the outcome of the game.  

Admittedly, I don't have a dog in the fight, but I like a good conspiracy theory as much as the next guy.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Perspective said:

Interesting.  I'd be interested to hear you elaborate on how the officials played a significant role in the outcome of the game.  

Admittedly, I don't have a dog in the fight, but I like a good conspiracy theory as much as the next guy.  

Apparently, the video showed Chaminade-Madonna making a critical conversion on 4th down to keep their drive alive to potentially score points and the officials ruled that they didn't have enough. It is controversial and that is why I didn't want to knee jerk on moving them down many spots because of that and being a 1-point game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Joshua Wilson said:

The reason I didn't drop them that much is because after looking at everything, it was very evident the officials played a significant role in the outcome of the game. I am not 100% sold on Carol City. If they lose to Atlantic that is certainly going to drop them further, but I can't fully justify a full drop after something that was not decided on the field. Carol City is struggling up and down and really I feel Chaminade-Madonna is the better team still. 

Thanks for answering.  I didn’t see the game or hear what happened.  Sounds like  Chaminade wasn’t a lock to win even if they didn’t get hosed on a spot.  They can redeem themself this week.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


  • Posts

    • Agree with what you think mostly, except I'd use a 4 year average and only move the top team in each region up and bottom team in each region down based on that average. I think 4 years gives a better overall picture of a program.
    • What this means is we will soon see one of two scenarios play out in the coming years: 1) A subset of students will eventually not be able to attend a "good" school because there is simply no space for them due to there being a scarcity of "good" schools 2) Assuming compulsory attendance remains a thing, we will see longtime elite private high schools nosedive in performance. The schools can not perform magic: unmotivated, unprepared often defiant students will NOT be good students no matter what the school does/doesn't do. And oftentimes these sorts of students do have parents who will do the absolute bare minimum needed to get the kid into a private school through the new rules. Anyone who genuinely believes that the schools with higher test scores automatically do a better job of teaching the kids than schools with lower scores is an imbecile. 
    • Here’s a scenario that will cook your noodle. There’s an 11th grader at a D rated public school. Lives in a bad neighborhood with a single mom and a bunch of siblings. Dirt poor, and struggle just to eat and keep the lights on. He can’t get a part time job to help out because he has to watch his little siblings while his mom works.    The school he plays for has poor attendance at the football games, and is always bad. He is a super star for them and tons of new bandwagon fans start to attend the games because they are good and he is the reason. School is making tons of new money.    Season is over. Back to reality for him. School year is over. Summer hits. Some “runner” on behalf of the rich local private school “offers” his mom, him, and all his siblings a way out of poverty. New place to live, food on the table, and an opportunity to get a quality education and maximize exposure for all the top colleges to see. A once in a lifetime opportunity to get his family out of poverty. What say you? Does he say no and continue to barely survive, or does he take the deal? 
    • To make it short and sweet. I am against breaking the rules. If there is a rule that seems outdated or unfair then it should be amended/changed/repealed with majority rule 
    • I am a huge proponent of innocent until proven guilty, and due process with credible evidence. I support a credible investigation, and not some witch hunt by disgruntled folks both near and far from the program. Let’s hope they can get to the bottom of this quickly 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...