Jump to content

Teams without a State Title


OldSchoolLion

Recommended Posts


21 minutes ago, ColumbiaHighFan2017class said:

Why not go play STA or Lakeland

 

Then Madison would realize just how tough it is to hang with a large school power

Only them schools are better than Madison. Madison is elite ranked 212 in the country. I wish one day the reach the top 25. That's there last goal. Greatest small school ever

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Edgewater appeared in 3 straight 6A title games.  They lost the 2002 title to Miami Norland on a last minute Hail Mary. 

In both 1980 and 1982, Columbus had to travel about 700 miles from Miami to Pensacola to play in the 4A finals.  In 1982, they had to play undefeated Woodham(now closed) in the final, a team that was ranked #4 in the country by USA Today. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, 561_Fan said:

Pahokee (which is smaller) and Glades Central have more state titles. Probably, more high school All-Americans, and Pahokee has 2 Mr. Florida’s. So how’s MC the greatest small school ever??? Both schools have been nationally ranked as well.

The Muck has done big things in high school football over the years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


  • Posts

    • Agree with what you think mostly, except I'd use a 4 year average and only move the top team in each region up and bottom team in each region down based on that average. I think 4 years gives a better overall picture of a program.
    • What this means is we will soon see one of two scenarios play out in the coming years: 1) A subset of students will eventually not be able to attend a "good" school because there is simply no space for them due to there being a scarcity of "good" schools 2) Assuming compulsory attendance remains a thing, we will see longtime elite private high schools nosedive in performance. The schools can not perform magic: unmotivated, unprepared often defiant students will NOT be good students no matter what the school does/doesn't do. And oftentimes these sorts of students do have parents who will do the absolute bare minimum needed to get the kid into a private school through the new rules. Anyone who genuinely believes that the schools with higher test scores automatically do a better job of teaching the kids than schools with lower scores is an imbecile. 
    • Here’s a scenario that will cook your noodle. There’s an 11th grader at a D rated public school. Lives in a bad neighborhood with a single mom and a bunch of siblings. Dirt poor, and struggle just to eat and keep the lights on. He can’t get a part time job to help out because he has to watch his little siblings while his mom works.    The school he plays for has poor attendance at the football games, and is always bad. He is a super star for them and tons of new bandwagon fans start to attend the games because they are good and he is the reason. School is making tons of new money.    Season is over. Back to reality for him. School year is over. Summer hits. Some “runner” on behalf of the rich local private school “offers” his mom, him, and all his siblings a way out of poverty. New place to live, food on the table, and an opportunity to get a quality education and maximize exposure for all the top colleges to see. A once in a lifetime opportunity to get his family out of poverty. What say you? Does he say no and continue to barely survive, or does he take the deal? 
    • To make it short and sweet. I am against breaking the rules. If there is a rule that seems outdated or unfair then it should be amended/changed/repealed with majority rule 
    • I am a huge proponent of innocent until proven guilty, and due process with credible evidence. I support a credible investigation, and not some witch hunt by disgruntled folks both near and far from the program. Let’s hope they can get to the bottom of this quickly 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...