Jump to content

Columbia vs Lee round 2


DisabledAccount

Recommended Posts


14 minutes ago, badbird said:

So Columbia shouldn’t have been in your top 50 all year?   6A north is not good.  I’ve said that all year.

The first half of the year yes but it seemed every week they got worse. When u cant even line up right theres no way you can execute the play, and that's on the coach. Everyone I was sitting with at the game was like do they even practice these plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Phfootball9 said:

I don't understand Lee is a good team why would escambia have to do anything other than win in the regional finals to maintain or even improve their ranking?

Lee's defense is very good and will keep them in most any game.  Their offense has to manufacture points, which is never good.  If travel weren't involved I would give Lee a shot.  Escambia will be the win the north for one reason only........I-10.  It is the road that kills dreams.  It has been that way for decades.  I wish there were a stat on how teams fare having to make that trip either direction.  I would bet the visiting teams have won very few of those contests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, shredstar said:

Lee's defense is very good and will keep them in most any game.  Their offense has to manufacture points, which is never good.  If travel weren't involved I would give Lee a shot.  Escambia will be the win the north for one reason only........I-10.  It is the road that kills dreams.  It has been that way for decades.  I wish there were a stat on how teams fare having to make that trip either direction.  I would bet the visiting teams have won very few of those contests.

It is also the road that seems to kill state champ dreams for a lot of panhandle team. As much as I hate to admit it, Jacksonville or Gainesville is probably the best place for state games. No more than 5 hours for anyone (except maybe Lee, Collier, and Monroe).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 181pl said:

It is also the road that seems to kill state champ dreams for a lot of panhandle team. As much as I hate to admit it, Jacksonville or Gainesville is probably the best place for state games. No more than 5 hours for anyone (except maybe Lee, Collier, and Monroe).

Yep.  Works both ways for sure.  Gainesville would be the best place.  They have had them there before.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, shredstar said:

Lee's defense is very good and will keep them in most any game.  Their offense has to manufacture points, which is never good.  If travel weren't involved I would give Lee a shot.  Escambia will be the win the north for one reason only........I-10.  It is the road that kills dreams.  It has been that way for decades.  I wish there were a stat on how teams fare having to make that trip either direction.  I would bet the visiting teams have won very few of those contests.

Escambia is 9-1 at home in the playoffs versus teams from Tally or eastward. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The game was closer than the final score in my eyes. Mainland's qb gave Escambia some problems, which forced Esc star rb Frank Peasant to play linebacker as well last night. I don't think he's done that all year. 

If Lee's offense really is terrible than Escambia should be able to win this game comfortably.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, uncleluke23 said:

The game was closer than the final score in my eyes. Mainland's qb gave Escambia some problems, which forced Esc star rb Frank Peasant to play linebacker as well last night. I don't think he's done that all year. 

If Lee's offense really is terrible than Escambia should be able to win this game comfortably.

 

Lee QB (Sophomore) is very erratic and seems to have deer in headlights in the face of pressure, if Escambia can force pressure well they will either force Lee to focus on run or sub in the senior (who normally plays reciever) to play QB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ColumbiaHighFan2017class said:

Should Madison not be in top 50 since columbia handed them their worst loss of season?

There was a ? by my question but you refused to answer it.  It was not a statement.  Deflecting you are good at.  You said if Escambia doesn't beat Lee by 21 they don't deserve to be top 25.  Well if beating Lee by 21 gets you in the top 25 what does losing to them twice get you?

can't judge a season off one game.  With that said Madison lost to Columbia and Lakewood.  Madison would struggle to beat larger really good schools.  I would put them in the 40 range.  Plenty of top 50 teams have lost games to people not in the top 50.  Atlantic, Lee, North Marion are good teams not great.  I would put Madison in with them.  You went 1-3 vs them.  Columbia in my opinion would be about 50.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...



  • Posts

    • Agree with what you think mostly, except I'd use a 4 year average and only move the top team in each region up and bottom team in each region down based on that average. I think 4 years gives a better overall picture of a program.
    • What this means is we will soon see one of two scenarios play out in the coming years: 1) A subset of students will eventually not be able to attend a "good" school because there is simply no space for them due to there being a scarcity of "good" schools 2) Assuming compulsory attendance remains a thing, we will see longtime elite private high schools nosedive in performance. The schools can not perform magic: unmotivated, unprepared often defiant students will NOT be good students no matter what the school does/doesn't do. And oftentimes these sorts of students do have parents who will do the absolute bare minimum needed to get the kid into a private school through the new rules. Anyone who genuinely believes that the schools with higher test scores automatically do a better job of teaching the kids than schools with lower scores is an imbecile. 
    • Here’s a scenario that will cook your noodle. There’s an 11th grader at a D rated public school. Lives in a bad neighborhood with a single mom and a bunch of siblings. Dirt poor, and struggle just to eat and keep the lights on. He can’t get a part time job to help out because he has to watch his little siblings while his mom works.    The school he plays for has poor attendance at the football games, and is always bad. He is a super star for them and tons of new bandwagon fans start to attend the games because they are good and he is the reason. School is making tons of new money.    Season is over. Back to reality for him. School year is over. Summer hits. Some “runner” on behalf of the rich local private school “offers” his mom, him, and all his siblings a way out of poverty. New place to live, food on the table, and an opportunity to get a quality education and maximize exposure for all the top colleges to see. A once in a lifetime opportunity to get his family out of poverty. What say you? Does he say no and continue to barely survive, or does he take the deal? 
    • To make it short and sweet. I am against breaking the rules. If there is a rule that seems outdated or unfair then it should be amended/changed/repealed with majority rule 
    • I am a huge proponent of innocent until proven guilty, and due process with credible evidence. I support a credible investigation, and not some witch hunt by disgruntled folks both near and far from the program. Let’s hope they can get to the bottom of this quickly 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...