Jump to content

Need some rule explanation


DisabledAccount

Recommended Posts

@Jambun82

 

What is the rule with hurdling in high school? I always thought it was only a penalty if you don't completely clear the defender in the jump but last night columbia was called for a 15 yard penalty for hurdling even though the player completely cleared the defender

 

Here is a tape of the play 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, ColumbiaHighFan2017class said:

@Jambun82

 

What is the rule with hurdling in high school? I always thought it was only a penalty if you don't completely clear the defender in the jump but last night columbia was called for a 15 yard penalty for hurdling even though the player completely cleared the defender

 

Here is a tape of the play 

 

 

 

 

Here is the actual wording of the rule, which is Rule 9, Section 4, Article 3, Subject D in the national rulebook: "An attempt by a player to jump (hurdle) with one or both feet or knees foremost over an opponent who is contacting the ground with no part of his body except one or both feet is illegal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CoachK said:

Here is the actual wording of the rule, which is Rule 9, Section 4, Article 3, Subject D in the national rulebook: "An attempt by a player to jump (hurdle) with one or both feet or knees foremost over an opponent who is contacting the ground with no part of his body except one or both feet is illegal.

CoachK has the rule right out of the book. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To put it in even more simple terms....it is illegal for an offensive player to hurdle a defensive player who is standing on their feet. It is legal for an offensive player to hurdle a defensive player who is on their knees or laying on the ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, gatorman-uf said:

This is from A LOOOOOOONG time ago, but even on Saturdays for a while it was illegal. Randy Moss should have been flagged for this play. 

Gatorman, I have no idea what the college rule was at the time, but under existing high school rules, that's a close call.  In addition to a defender being on his knees or lying on the ground (see Just a Coach's post above), a defensive player can be hurdled if both his feet are off the ground; i.e., he lays out in an attempt to make a diving tackle . . . which arguably is what the defender trying to make the play on Moss did.  In real time, it's pretty tough to determine whether the defender's feet are both off the ground at the precise moment of the hurdle.  Judgment call, I guess, but I would not fault the officials for not making the call on this play.    Oh, and this clip just shows that Moss was a man playing with boys when he was at Marshall.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/9/2020 at 9:18 AM, Perspective said:

The kid made a very athletic move that would be OK on Saturday or Sunday, but the officials got the call right. 

11 for 22
154 passing yards 
2 TDs

11 carries for 90 yards 
2 TDs rushing

 

This was his stats from this past week in what was his first start at QB in his career at any level 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Perspective said:

Gatorman, I have no idea what the college rule was at the time, but under existing high school rules, that's a close call.  In addition to a defender being on his knees or lying on the ground (see Just a Coach's post above), a defensive player can be hurdled if both his feet are off the ground; i.e., he lays out in an attempt to make a diving tackle . . . which arguably is what the defender trying to make the play on Moss did.  In real time, it's pretty tough to determine whether the defender's feet are both off the ground at the precise moment of the hurdle.  Judgment call, I guess, but I would not fault the officials for not making the call on this play.    Oh, and this clip just shows that Moss was a man playing with boys when he was at Marshall.    

Someplace in Moss's 30 for 30 he talks about it, but yes, he was a man among boys (helped he had a decent QB as well). Army was actually coming off a 10-2 season the previous year and barely lost to Auburn in the Independence Bowl. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


  • Posts

    • Agree with what you think mostly, except I'd use a 4 year average and only move the top team in each region up and bottom team in each region down based on that average. I think 4 years gives a better overall picture of a program.
    • What this means is we will soon see one of two scenarios play out in the coming years: 1) A subset of students will eventually not be able to attend a "good" school because there is simply no space for them due to there being a scarcity of "good" schools 2) Assuming compulsory attendance remains a thing, we will see longtime elite private high schools nosedive in performance. The schools can not perform magic: unmotivated, unprepared often defiant students will NOT be good students no matter what the school does/doesn't do. And oftentimes these sorts of students do have parents who will do the absolute bare minimum needed to get the kid into a private school through the new rules. Anyone who genuinely believes that the schools with higher test scores automatically do a better job of teaching the kids than schools with lower scores is an imbecile. 
    • Here’s a scenario that will cook your noodle. There’s an 11th grader at a D rated public school. Lives in a bad neighborhood with a single mom and a bunch of siblings. Dirt poor, and struggle just to eat and keep the lights on. He can’t get a part time job to help out because he has to watch his little siblings while his mom works.    The school he plays for has poor attendance at the football games, and is always bad. He is a super star for them and tons of new bandwagon fans start to attend the games because they are good and he is the reason. School is making tons of new money.    Season is over. Back to reality for him. School year is over. Summer hits. Some “runner” on behalf of the rich local private school “offers” his mom, him, and all his siblings a way out of poverty. New place to live, food on the table, and an opportunity to get a quality education and maximize exposure for all the top colleges to see. A once in a lifetime opportunity to get his family out of poverty. What say you? Does he say no and continue to barely survive, or does he take the deal? 
    • To make it short and sweet. I am against breaking the rules. If there is a rule that seems outdated or unfair then it should be amended/changed/repealed with majority rule 
    • I am a huge proponent of innocent until proven guilty, and due process with credible evidence. I support a credible investigation, and not some witch hunt by disgruntled folks both near and far from the program. Let’s hope they can get to the bottom of this quickly 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...