Jump to content

FINAL DILLARD 33 GLADES CENTRAL 6


THIS_IS_DILLARD

Recommended Posts


  • THIS_IS_DILLARD changed the title to 2nd QT DiLLARD 18 GlADES CENTRAL 0
5 minutes ago, THIS_IS_DILLARD said:

They just bucked Dillard bro lol that wasn’t no TD by GC lol

That wasn’t a TD by y’all RB (the second one), he was tackled short. It wasn’t close, that’s why their coach got the penalty. 
 

GC has always been a second half team, this game is FAR from over. PK has experienced them second half comebacks a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 561_Fan said:

That wasn’t a TD by y’all RB (the second one), he was tackled short. It wasn’t close, that’s why their coach got the penalty. 
 

GC has always been a second half team, this game is FAR from over. PK has experienced them second half comebacks a lot.

This gone spark us even more to blow y’all out this was suppose to be 18-0 right na we’ve been the better team despite GC 28 in the nation ranking 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • THIS_IS_DILLARD changed the title to 4th QT DiLLARD 18 GlADES CENTRAL 6
  • THIS_IS_DILLARD changed the title to 4th QT DiLLARD 25 GlADES CENTRAL 6
  • THIS_IS_DILLARD changed the title to 4th QT DiLLARD 33 GLADES CENTRAL 6
1 minute ago, 561_Fan said:

Was a good, hard-fought game. Dillard’s defense held up better than I thought against GCs offense. GC doesn’t have the explosive WRs like they usually have. I heard GC only practiced 2 days this week. 
 

Congrats to Dillard and good luck next week. 

They ranked 28 in the nation Tho and we ain’t ranked at all so AYE LETSSS GOOOO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • THIS_IS_DILLARD changed the title to FINAL DILLARD 33 GLADES CENTRAL 6

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...



  • Posts

    • Agree with what you think mostly, except I'd use a 4 year average and only move the top team in each region up and bottom team in each region down based on that average. I think 4 years gives a better overall picture of a program.
    • What this means is we will soon see one of two scenarios play out in the coming years: 1) A subset of students will eventually not be able to attend a "good" school because there is simply no space for them due to there being a scarcity of "good" schools 2) Assuming compulsory attendance remains a thing, we will see longtime elite private high schools nosedive in performance. The schools can not perform magic: unmotivated, unprepared often defiant students will NOT be good students no matter what the school does/doesn't do. And oftentimes these sorts of students do have parents who will do the absolute bare minimum needed to get the kid into a private school through the new rules. Anyone who genuinely believes that the schools with higher test scores automatically do a better job of teaching the kids than schools with lower scores is an imbecile. 
    • Here’s a scenario that will cook your noodle. There’s an 11th grader at a D rated public school. Lives in a bad neighborhood with a single mom and a bunch of siblings. Dirt poor, and struggle just to eat and keep the lights on. He can’t get a part time job to help out because he has to watch his little siblings while his mom works.    The school he plays for has poor attendance at the football games, and is always bad. He is a super star for them and tons of new bandwagon fans start to attend the games because they are good and he is the reason. School is making tons of new money.    Season is over. Back to reality for him. School year is over. Summer hits. Some “runner” on behalf of the rich local private school “offers” his mom, him, and all his siblings a way out of poverty. New place to live, food on the table, and an opportunity to get a quality education and maximize exposure for all the top colleges to see. A once in a lifetime opportunity to get his family out of poverty. What say you? Does he say no and continue to barely survive, or does he take the deal? 
    • To make it short and sweet. I am against breaking the rules. If there is a rule that seems outdated or unfair then it should be amended/changed/repealed with majority rule 
    • I am a huge proponent of innocent until proven guilty, and due process with credible evidence. I support a credible investigation, and not some witch hunt by disgruntled folks both near and far from the program. Let’s hope they can get to the bottom of this quickly 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...