Jump to content

Aquinas and Mainland nationally ranked


STARaiders2014

Recommended Posts


@Columbiahighfan That's not true because people didn't expect them to do as we as they did in 2014 season. The OOS games yes because they weren't tough opponent's, but a lot of people thought Central would beat them and Cocoa which meant they wouldn't have gotten there 3rd straight title. I know this upcoming season is a little different considering they lost a well respected coach and lost talent but they did gain talent. So it will be interesting to see if the F-5 Tornadoes can beat St. Thomas and Central. I have a question though which is everyone keeps talking about these 2 match ups St. Thomas and Central but what about the rest of the season I mean I see them making it back to states.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see BTW making it to states in 4A. Now is Cocoa going North this year? If they are then BTW will definitely be in Orlando while Cocoa and Bolles battle it out up North. 

If not then Cocoa might get their revenge change vs BTW and truthfully I could see Cocoa winning that game. Came damn close last season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@ Zoeboy

The question is when will you???

Season starts in August

When glades can get back to their winning ways!!! All respect for glades central and the muck!! All love love baby!! Season do starts in August... Can't wait!!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also coached at somerset in the old district 2b.. But I love highschool football and rep fla mainly s fla when I visit other places up north.... I do hope yall get back right... But like the og's say to be the best you got to beat the best.. That's why I still gotta go with BTW and trust me they do have a squad... One of the coaches that coach with me at somerset coaches over there...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Agree with what you think mostly, except I'd use a 4 year average and only move the top team in each region up and bottom team in each region down based on that average. I think 4 years gives a better overall picture of a program.
    • What this means is we will soon see one of two scenarios play out in the coming years: 1) A subset of students will eventually not be able to attend a "good" school because there is simply no space for them due to there being a scarcity of "good" schools 2) Assuming compulsory attendance remains a thing, we will see longtime elite private high schools nosedive in performance. The schools can not perform magic: unmotivated, unprepared often defiant students will NOT be good students no matter what the school does/doesn't do. And oftentimes these sorts of students do have parents who will do the absolute bare minimum needed to get the kid into a private school through the new rules. Anyone who genuinely believes that the schools with higher test scores automatically do a better job of teaching the kids than schools with lower scores is an imbecile. 
    • Here’s a scenario that will cook your noodle. There’s an 11th grader at a D rated public school. Lives in a bad neighborhood with a single mom and a bunch of siblings. Dirt poor, and struggle just to eat and keep the lights on. He can’t get a part time job to help out because he has to watch his little siblings while his mom works.    The school he plays for has poor attendance at the football games, and is always bad. He is a super star for them and tons of new bandwagon fans start to attend the games because they are good and he is the reason. School is making tons of new money.    Season is over. Back to reality for him. School year is over. Summer hits. Some “runner” on behalf of the rich local private school “offers” his mom, him, and all his siblings a way out of poverty. New place to live, food on the table, and an opportunity to get a quality education and maximize exposure for all the top colleges to see. A once in a lifetime opportunity to get his family out of poverty. What say you? Does he say no and continue to barely survive, or does he take the deal? 
    • To make it short and sweet. I am against breaking the rules. If there is a rule that seems outdated or unfair then it should be amended/changed/repealed with majority rule 
    • I am a huge proponent of innocent until proven guilty, and due process with credible evidence. I support a credible investigation, and not some witch hunt by disgruntled folks both near and far from the program. Let’s hope they can get to the bottom of this quickly 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...