Jump to content

Miami Central


Zoe Boy

Recommended Posts


@omorley So who do you see or want to finish as district runner up behind Central. Carol City, Norland and Hialeah-Miami Lakes are the lucky 3. Now again anything can happen with Central but I'm rolling with them to be district champs.

Carol City should have beat central last year.. Carol City got a squad but their coaching staff is suspect
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carol City should have beat central last year.. Carol City got a squad but their coaching staff is suspect

This is what I have been told about Carol City. I expect the Cheifs to be runners up in that district to Central. However, doesn't Central by DeMatha? As well as BTW. Those are going to be very big games and will really tell where Central is in terms of how dominant they can be this season.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carol City was good last year and will be better this year. They play Central hard and fall apart when they play Northwestern. I got CC to take runner up in the district. Strangly a coach from Carol City and Northwestern have a son that plays for Central.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carol City was good last year and will be better this year. They play Central hard and fall apart when they play Northwestern. I got CC to take runner up in the district. Strangly a coach from Carol City and Northwestern have a son that plays for Central.

Really? That is interesting to say the least lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a weird situation. We joke about it,but its all love. Thats were they wanna be.

I understand it is different, but hey to each his own right?

By the way switching the topic, but I am pretty disappointed that Aquinas has not called Central at all about games. That game would be a headlining NATIONAL game of the week. I know BTW is good and I respect them a ton. However, #2 vs #16 in the nation is way better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand it is different, but hey to each his own right?

By the way switching the topic, but I am pretty disappointed that Aquinas has not called Central at all about games. That game would be a headlining NATIONAL game of the week. I know BTW is good and I respect them a ton. However, #2 vs #16 in the nation is way better.

STA never contact MC for a game?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To my knowledge they have not. Central guys have also been very vocal about it as well. I think an Aquinas/Central matchup at Traz Powell would be awesome! Or at Joe Robbie if they cannot fit the crowd there.

Lol it's funny you said that and mr slick is my witness theirs a big STA fan that's on the national site claiming that he has text messages and records showing that MC basically ducking STA... That's why some of the coaches at Central took offense to it and we're basically unhappy about that rumor... How close are you to the STA program..
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol it's funny you said that and mr slick is my witness theirs a big STA fan that's on the national site claiming that he has text messages and records showing that MC basically ducking STA... That's why some of the coaches at Central took offense to it and we're basically unhappy about that rumor... How close are you to the STA program..

If he has text messages than he is closer than me. I am not as close as I once was. From what I have been told though they haven't contacted MC. However if the guy on the National Board has the texts then he is probably right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he has text messages than he is closer than me. I am not as close as I once was. From what I have been told though they haven't contacted MC. However if the guy on the National Board has the texts then he is probably right.

Ok cause the MC coaches said they never heard from STA ... Which I don't understand because MC plays anybody anywhere anytime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Agree with what you think mostly, except I'd use a 4 year average and only move the top team in each region up and bottom team in each region down based on that average. I think 4 years gives a better overall picture of a program.
    • What this means is we will soon see one of two scenarios play out in the coming years: 1) A subset of students will eventually not be able to attend a "good" school because there is simply no space for them due to there being a scarcity of "good" schools 2) Assuming compulsory attendance remains a thing, we will see longtime elite private high schools nosedive in performance. The schools can not perform magic: unmotivated, unprepared often defiant students will NOT be good students no matter what the school does/doesn't do. And oftentimes these sorts of students do have parents who will do the absolute bare minimum needed to get the kid into a private school through the new rules. Anyone who genuinely believes that the schools with higher test scores automatically do a better job of teaching the kids than schools with lower scores is an imbecile. 
    • Here’s a scenario that will cook your noodle. There’s an 11th grader at a D rated public school. Lives in a bad neighborhood with a single mom and a bunch of siblings. Dirt poor, and struggle just to eat and keep the lights on. He can’t get a part time job to help out because he has to watch his little siblings while his mom works.    The school he plays for has poor attendance at the football games, and is always bad. He is a super star for them and tons of new bandwagon fans start to attend the games because they are good and he is the reason. School is making tons of new money.    Season is over. Back to reality for him. School year is over. Summer hits. Some “runner” on behalf of the rich local private school “offers” his mom, him, and all his siblings a way out of poverty. New place to live, food on the table, and an opportunity to get a quality education and maximize exposure for all the top colleges to see. A once in a lifetime opportunity to get his family out of poverty. What say you? Does he say no and continue to barely survive, or does he take the deal? 
    • To make it short and sweet. I am against breaking the rules. If there is a rule that seems outdated or unfair then it should be amended/changed/repealed with majority rule 
    • I am a huge proponent of innocent until proven guilty, and due process with credible evidence. I support a credible investigation, and not some witch hunt by disgruntled folks both near and far from the program. Let’s hope they can get to the bottom of this quickly 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...