Jump to content

2021 Transfer Thread


DisabledAccount

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, THIS_IS_DILLARD said:

I agree, but I’m my opinion it should be BANNED publicly and privately, and it should be a STRICT law that if you transfer to a school that wasn’t your original zoned school then you have to wait a full calendar year before you’re able to participate in any sport at that school. 

That's why I highlighted the situation with our back up QB, Blake Birchler.  Plays one sport for a semester at one school, then another sport at his original school the 2nd semester.  Heck, we had a running back last year played 2 games then transferred to a private school for the rest of the season.  This is insanity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Just now, Ray Icaza said:

That's why I highlighted the situation with our back up QB, Blake Birchler.  Plays one sport for a semester at one school, then another sport at his original school the 2nd semester.  Heck, we had a running back last year played 2 games then transferred to a private school for the rest of the season.  This is insanity.

That’s ridiculous & sad AF actually, and since when did we start normalizing high school kids getting on social media and writing letters and signing the letters on where they will be transferring to to finish their high school career!? 
 

social media has really become our worst em enemy, these high school kids, try to bring everything they see in the NFL & college to high school & that’s beyond crazy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ray Icaza said:

That's why I highlighted the situation with our back up QB, Blake Birchler.  Plays one sport for a semester at one school, then another sport at his original school the 2nd semester.  Heck, we had a running back last year played 2 games then transferred to a private school for the rest of the season.  This is insanity.

Wait he was allowed to play in the same season he transferred eventhough he played for a different school in the same season? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, KeemD321 said:

Wait he was allowed to play in the same season he transferred eventhough he played for a different school in the same season? 

 

12 minutes ago, KeemD321 said:

Wait he was allowed to play in the same season he transferred eventhough he played for a different school in the same season? 

Yes, played in two games and then transferred to a private school (West Oaks Academy).  Was their leading rusher in the state championship game for that classification. Now for his senior year at Freedom HS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Ray Icaza said:

 

Yes, played in two games and then transferred to a private school (West Oaks Academy).  Was their leading rusher in the state championship game for that classification. Now for his senior year at Freedom HS.

 

9 minutes ago, Ray Icaza said:

 

Yes, played in two games and then transferred to a private school (West Oaks Academy).  Was their leading rusher in the state championship game for that classification. Now for his senior year at Freedom HS.

Correction, West Oaks Christian Academy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Ray Icaza said:

 

Yes, played in two games and then transferred to a private school (West Oaks Academy).  Was their leading rusher in the state championship game for that classification. Now for his senior year at Freedom HS.

Would've thought he wouldn't be able to play. Unless West Oaks isn't a FHSAA member in football

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/10/2021 at 2:48 PM, Ray Icaza said:

I agree 100%, but as others have pointed out in earlier post our legislature has legalized it.  Our man from Columbia deserves cudos for spotlighting this problem involving both public and private schools.  I think it is an easy way out for kids when things get tough or uncomfortable.  Pro sports builds super teams, recruiting in college is a sleezy endeavor, the transfer portal now and high school is going down the same path.  I hate it.  I would prefer we took our lumps every few years when personnel is down to have an even shot those years when we have talent.  I will still bleed Blue & Gold.

The Florida legislature approved transferring at will. However, I believe they meant transferring from a failing school academically to a preforming school academically. I don't think they ever intended transferring at will for sports only. Besides, the FHSAA controls all school sports in Florida and not the Florida legislature. The FHSAA could have simply reverted back to the prior ruling wherein a player had to wait out one year in order to play sports at a school they are transferring to. It worked in the past, for the most part, and it would work again. B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Proseteye said:

The Florida legislature approved transferring at will. However, I believe they meant transferring from a failing school academically to a preforming school academically. I don't think they ever intended transferring at will for sports only. Besides, the FHSAA controls all school sports in Florida and not the Florida legislature. The FHSAA could have simply reverted back to the prior ruling wherein a player had to wait out one year in order to play sports at a school they are transferring to. It worked in the past, for the most part, and it would work again. B)

Actually yes they do, if the FHSAA doesn't do exactly what the legislature tells them then Florida legislation pulls the FHSAA funding and they go broke 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, ColumbiaHighFan2017class said:

Actually yes they do, if the FHSAA doesn't do exactly what the legislature tells them then Florida legislation pulls the FHSAA funding and they go broke 

 

I seriously doubt that the legislature would cut off funding to the FHSAA if they implemented their previous policy of waiting 1 year to play sports after transferring. We are talking about a previous policy that was in place for quite some time and the legislature never interfered with FHSAA rulings. How do you know what the legislature would do or is this just your opinion? Show me where it states any type of language in the rulings that would prohibit the FHSAA from simply implementing such a policy. Once again, I believe the legislature made the at will transfer policy for academic reasons and never thought that it would apply to anything but. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Proseteye said:

I seriously doubt that the legislature would cut off funding to the FHSAA if they implemented their previous policy of waiting 1 year to play sports after transferring. We are talking about a previous policy that was in place for quite some time and the legislature never interfered with FHSAA rulings. How do you know what the legislature would do or is this just your opinion? Show me where it states any type of language in the rulings that would prohibit the FHSAA from simply implementing such a policy. Once again, I believe the legislature made the at will transfer policy for academic reasons and never thought that it would apply to anything but. 

You might be right that the legislature may have been fooled into thinking it was for academic reasons.  But the legislators from Lakeland that pushed this ruling weren't thinking about academics, rather the heat they were getting from surrounding schools.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, THIS_IS_DILLARD said:

That’s ridiculous & sad AF actually, and since when did we start normalizing high school kids getting on social media and writing letters and signing the letters on where they will be transferring to to finish their high school career!? 
 

social media has really become our worst em enemy, these high school kids, try to bring everything they see in the NFL & college to high school & that’s beyond crazy. 

Don't you wanna know where they're going 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smh these transfers are getting crazy & to think it’s these amount of parents out here approving this. 
 

I guess anything u got to do for a possible big pay check in the future huh. 
 

and no if all these transfers were coming to Dillard I wouldn’t care for it either, it just didn’t look right. Maybe it’s the old school in me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, THIS_IS_DILLARD said:

Smh these transfers are getting crazy & to think it’s these amount of parents out here approving this. 
 

I guess anything u got to do for a possible big pay check in the future huh. 
 

and no if all these transfers were coming to Dillard I wouldn’t care for it either, it just didn’t look right. Maybe it’s the old school in me.

I don't have an exact number but ik Dillard has gotten more than Cardinal Gibbons have for what it's worth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ColumbiaHighFan2017class said:

I don't have an exact number but ik Dillard has gotten more than Cardinal Gibbons have for what it's worth

What does Dillard or cardinal gibbons have to do with what I just stated.? I could’ve sworn I said up top that EVEN IF this was DiLLARD getting all of these transfers I wouldn’t care for it. 
 

plus so far this off season Dillard has gotten only maybe 2-3 transfers total. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, THIS_IS_DILLARD said:

Smh these transfers are getting crazy & to think it’s these amount of parents out here approving this. 
 

I guess anything u got to do for a possible big pay check in the future huh. 
 

and no if all these transfers were coming to Dillard I wouldn’t care for it either, it just didn’t look right. Maybe it’s the old school in me.

Don't you wanna win

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...



  • Posts

    • Agree with what you think mostly, except I'd use a 4 year average and only move the top team in each region up and bottom team in each region down based on that average. I think 4 years gives a better overall picture of a program.
    • What this means is we will soon see one of two scenarios play out in the coming years: 1) A subset of students will eventually not be able to attend a "good" school because there is simply no space for them due to there being a scarcity of "good" schools 2) Assuming compulsory attendance remains a thing, we will see longtime elite private high schools nosedive in performance. The schools can not perform magic: unmotivated, unprepared often defiant students will NOT be good students no matter what the school does/doesn't do. And oftentimes these sorts of students do have parents who will do the absolute bare minimum needed to get the kid into a private school through the new rules. Anyone who genuinely believes that the schools with higher test scores automatically do a better job of teaching the kids than schools with lower scores is an imbecile. 
    • Here’s a scenario that will cook your noodle. There’s an 11th grader at a D rated public school. Lives in a bad neighborhood with a single mom and a bunch of siblings. Dirt poor, and struggle just to eat and keep the lights on. He can’t get a part time job to help out because he has to watch his little siblings while his mom works.    The school he plays for has poor attendance at the football games, and is always bad. He is a super star for them and tons of new bandwagon fans start to attend the games because they are good and he is the reason. School is making tons of new money.    Season is over. Back to reality for him. School year is over. Summer hits. Some “runner” on behalf of the rich local private school “offers” his mom, him, and all his siblings a way out of poverty. New place to live, food on the table, and an opportunity to get a quality education and maximize exposure for all the top colleges to see. A once in a lifetime opportunity to get his family out of poverty. What say you? Does he say no and continue to barely survive, or does he take the deal? 
    • To make it short and sweet. I am against breaking the rules. If there is a rule that seems outdated or unfair then it should be amended/changed/repealed with majority rule 
    • I am a huge proponent of innocent until proven guilty, and due process with credible evidence. I support a credible investigation, and not some witch hunt by disgruntled folks both near and far from the program. Let’s hope they can get to the bottom of this quickly 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...