Jump to content

DILLARD (6-3) @ (7-2) CAROL CITY (NOV 13TH) 1ST ROUND OF THE PLAYOFFS


Recommended Posts

@zoe @broward @coloumbia as a man I want to apologize for my conduct last night I was waaayyy out of line I was disrespectful and that's not who I am as a person anymore regardless of what anyone says or do it does not matter what matter is how I respond and how I react. I have grown and matured and still have things I can continue to work on.

 

 You guys are my online football brothers and I respect all of you guys to the fullest I took some things to the heart which I shouldn't have this is a sports forum where everyone is entitled to there own opinion regardless if the next person agree or not so again I apologize and it wont happen again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


@zoe @broward @coloumbia as a man I want to apologize for my conduct last night I was waaayyy out of line I was disrespectful and that's not who I am as a person anymore regardless of what anyone says or do it does not matter what matter is how I respond and how I react. I have grown and matured and still have things I can continue to work on.

 

 You guys are my online football brothers and I respect all of you guys to the fullest I took some things to the heart which I shouldn't have this is a sports forum where everyone is entitled to there own opinion regardless if the next person agree or not so again I apologize and it wont happen again.

its alright, that was a very mature step by admiting you made a mistake and you recognize it, i understand how things can get out of hand, heck when i first joined i was constantly argueing everything on here, i feel i have matured though and you taking a good step right there, glad everyone is on same page, now lets get ready to have some fun, good luck to all your teams on potential playoff runs this coming month

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Agree with what you think mostly, except I'd use a 4 year average and only move the top team in each region up and bottom team in each region down based on that average. I think 4 years gives a better overall picture of a program.
    • What this means is we will soon see one of two scenarios play out in the coming years: 1) A subset of students will eventually not be able to attend a "good" school because there is simply no space for them due to there being a scarcity of "good" schools 2) Assuming compulsory attendance remains a thing, we will see longtime elite private high schools nosedive in performance. The schools can not perform magic: unmotivated, unprepared often defiant students will NOT be good students no matter what the school does/doesn't do. And oftentimes these sorts of students do have parents who will do the absolute bare minimum needed to get the kid into a private school through the new rules. Anyone who genuinely believes that the schools with higher test scores automatically do a better job of teaching the kids than schools with lower scores is an imbecile. 
    • Here’s a scenario that will cook your noodle. There’s an 11th grader at a D rated public school. Lives in a bad neighborhood with a single mom and a bunch of siblings. Dirt poor, and struggle just to eat and keep the lights on. He can’t get a part time job to help out because he has to watch his little siblings while his mom works.    The school he plays for has poor attendance at the football games, and is always bad. He is a super star for them and tons of new bandwagon fans start to attend the games because they are good and he is the reason. School is making tons of new money.    Season is over. Back to reality for him. School year is over. Summer hits. Some “runner” on behalf of the rich local private school “offers” his mom, him, and all his siblings a way out of poverty. New place to live, food on the table, and an opportunity to get a quality education and maximize exposure for all the top colleges to see. A once in a lifetime opportunity to get his family out of poverty. What say you? Does he say no and continue to barely survive, or does he take the deal? 
    • To make it short and sweet. I am against breaking the rules. If there is a rule that seems outdated or unfair then it should be amended/changed/repealed with majority rule 
    • I am a huge proponent of innocent until proven guilty, and due process with credible evidence. I support a credible investigation, and not some witch hunt by disgruntled folks both near and far from the program. Let’s hope they can get to the bottom of this quickly 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...