nolebull813

Wait are you the reason why they lost to Evans in the kumquat bowl in 92? I lost money on that game. You owe me!

I am. See my previous post

I would be perfect. I’m not a homer: I won’t rank teams on emotion. I know about football. And I don’t have a public school agenda.

And I do talk to him: I’m gonna go check him out against this South Carolina team.

He’s not confident in anything you mentioned

And they are preseason ranked on the account that they get the “South Florida bump” and the athletes on the team that are superior to the majority of the teams around the state

The 3 wins for Booker T have a combined record of 3-14!!!!!!!!!!!! So they are being ranked only and I mean ONLY on the account that they didn’t get blown out by MC and now Norland.

They have been in my state top 15 all year long. So how am I “counting them out”???

They got a brutal schedule. They play a top 10 (according to maxpreps) team from South Carolina tonight at Skyway.

They shouldn’t have to improve. The proof is already been exposed. Whatever the formula is to come up with these horrible ratings is already enough to come to the conclusion it’s all trash. It’s garbage in, garbage out

Cocoa probably wanted to win by 50 against EG. when you play the local teams you want to beat the tar out then. Hell you would want to do it for transfer purposes. Show the local kids who the big dog is.

If you think Cocoa was holding back against a county rival who thinks they are good cuz they are 5-0 then you are sadly mistaken

There is only so much info someone can go by. Each week things can change. You have to analyze the info you have. So if a team struggles with an inferior team, you have to take that into account.

That would be horrible and those rankings would need to be thrown in the trash

But even if you are toying with an inferior team, you should still be able to dominate them. I don’t think coaches say let’s go play half ass and get in a dog fight with a team that looks at us like their Super Bowl

Caught you. Now I know you are either ignorant, trolling or both “No other losses” what the heck does have to do with anything when all they played is bad and Inferior competition? You just look at records and think teams are better. Let me guess you had St Cloud over Osceola. You probably think Titusville is better than Miami Central. And you still don’t get it. You can be ranked above a team that beat you. It’s why Seminole is allowed to be ranked ahead of Treasure Coast

Lakeland was a good win for them, but they gave up 34 and then didn’t play another soul all year. Hell Lakeland hasn’t scored 34 all year and that’s against inferior opponents. I know Norland has an offense, but when they run into a team that can match them a try elite for athlete they are gonna get in trouble. Can’t wait for Norland vs MC. It will be the first test of the season for Norland

You misread it. When I did the rankings, I bumped AHP and STA over Norland. They are playing at the same level as Norland except they are playing way better teams. So bumped STA and AHP above them this week. And Norland finally gets a chance to flex their muscle and give people no doubt that they elite, and they can’t do it. They are still high ranked no doubt, but they just aren’t in the same caliber as the elite teams. Yet; beat Miami Central by 1 and we’ll talk

And Cocoa didn’t beat STA. I already posted 2 videos of teams losing the game while they were in victory formation. Either way Cocoa and STA are very close. I do believe STA would have beaten 2-3 Jones by more than 2 points though. And I think they would have been up by more than 14-0 at half against a team like Eau Gallie. Either way both are favored to win out and win state

How is STA being tier 2 TWO TIERS above Cocoa in tier 3?? 3-2=2????

And just because someone wins a head to head doesn’t mean they stay above them no matter any other results. Should Treasure Coast stay above Seminole no matter how many times they lose or what their results are? A few years ago Jesuit beat STA by 3 at home on a days notice of the game being formed. STA drove up the day of the game when the contract was signed the day before. Towards the end of the year STA was a well oiled machine and Jesuit was barely beating horrible teams. There was no doubt for people who follow football that STA was a better team late in the year

Norland didn’t beat BTW before the rankings came out dumbass

Yeah and they didn’t cry and complain that things were unfair. And Dade always had more population than the North Florida cities. The South Florida teams took their lumps and got better. Then as soon as they start to rise to prominence all of a sudden it’s not fair. Was it fair in the 80’s when the panhandle dominated? How come there was no split then? It’s messed up. Back in the day 9-1 teams would miss the playoffs. Now 1-9 will get you the number 1 seed and home field advantage throughout

I’m not saying it’s hard to rank them at all. Of course they should be ranked. It’s hard to find out where since the teams above and below them all have better wins

Booker T with another close loss to a better team. They are so hard to rank. They only played either really bad teams or elite ones. They handled their business against the bad ones, and competed admirably against the elite ones. So it’s hard to judge them other then not getting blown out by Norland and MC