Forums

Yes, that’s exactly what you would expect in Classes with widely disparate talent levels.  Just as is often seen in the opening round of NCAA March Madness.  And if one finds that desirable or entertaining, then so be it.  My point is that there are a multitude of ways to potentially provide more equitable competition in the regular season and playoffs.  For all the whining, the Metro-Suburban set-up provided more competitive playoffs.  Other methods (as you point out) have been proposed on these pages.  But perhaps I am in the minority view, and the status quo is acceptable to those involved.  

Wouldn't that be expected in any situation where we are seeding teams? Like the gap between a #1 and #8 is supposed to be big. If that continues in the 2nd round or the state finals, I think that is the bigger problem. And no, I am not suggesting that the system is good. For than 10 years, I have suggested that we do a classification system based on previous seasons' success rather than population. 

BTW/Springs didn’t Happen

You went 7-3? I got 5-4

Damn it. Fixed.