I've suggested multiple ideas that break away from the norm and that would fix a lot of the current issues and our incompetent state leadership won't touch it 

does it really matter something has been stated hundreds of times? It still doesn’t make it right. I can still have my own opinions. You don’t have to read the damn thing.   Meanwhile, the same group of people keep coming up with the most inane and nonsensical ways to handle the playoffs and the classifications. Wonder if that has any direct correlation to the huge drop in coverage and popularity of the sport over the last 10 or 15 years?

1)  I will defer to the mathematicians/statisticians on this board as to whether including margin of victory (up to a point; running clock – 35 points) provides more accuracy/validity in computer rankings 2)  I am not convinced that RPI can adequately differentiate between a 10-0 Armwood and a 10-0 Baker 3)  I am not convinced that anyone can establish the “right” weighting of the RPI variables, either statistically or by one’s own opinion.    

My concern with Booker is they will be coasting for the entire regional Playoffs then hit a buzzsaw. I think booker can hold on talent wise for a little bit but idk if they will be battle tested enough to keep that game close for 4 quarters    Lakeland may beat Gaither but anything can happen in the playoffs and looking at the matchups I felt that one could be a sneaky one for Lakeland especially since Gaither qb was a mid season transfer from Lakeland and Gaither has largely flown under the radar during the season    They may make that game competitive but I definitely have to lean WBR in that matchup but I haven't made my pick in that game yet as I'll wait until we get to Thanksgiving week when I reevaluate it 

Margin of victory basically rewards teams who can schedule absolutely garbage opponents to pile on wins. If I had to guess that was what allowed Choctawhatchee to jump St Augustine a few weeks ago because Choctawhatchee ran up the score against terrible panhandle teams and since the formula isn't weighting sos enough they were rewarded for running it up  And I would argue the current formula definitely isn't valuing quality of opponents at a high enough percentage to make a difference judging by how many teams made it to the 1 seed in some regions with awful sos ratings  Plus you can always increase the weight of the percentages in an rpi to account for quality of opponents the only downside is it being too high results in teams advancing higher for losing to good teams over winning over average teams