I know that technically speaking, the FHSAA considers spring football to be an extension of the fall season (like that makes a whole lot of sense). The obvious proviso is that seniors do not get to participate. That said, I've never really understood the rationale behind making transfers sit out the spring game. In this new Wild, Wild West of transfers and NIL, if a kid has transferred into a new school, why shouldn't they get to play in the spring game? They get to practice in the spring, right? So why not let them play in the spring game?
Seriously, this is more of a question than an argument. I just don't understand the reasoning behind making the kids sit out the spring game.
Perspective,
The numbers for Strength are the average of the moving average power rankings for each team in each class.
The numbers for parity reflect the “average deviation” of the power rankings for each team within each class. The lower the number, the more competitive the games within that class should be. So basically. Games between 6A schools should produce fewer blowouts than games between 3A.
I read that Southlake had 10 football transfers that didn’t get to play in the spring game.
And also, I think that Evan’s quarterback from Camden County is actually from Central Florida and he moved back. I could be wrong, but I believe that’s what I read.