Jump to content

Jimmyb80

Members
  • Posts

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Jimmyb80

  1. Rumor is EJ was not cleared to play until Monday and with no practice we’d-fri due to hurricane he didn’t get a lot of reps but I expect him to start vs Melbourne! Arunson has rehab when cast comes off today so he will not be playing again this season….I agree I believe Vero, at home, can win this game it’s just looking like the road is coming to an end though pretty soon unless EJ can really learn the offense is less than 2 total weeks of practice

  2. So here’s what I MEAN…..everyone seems to be OK with the argument that losing to a “better team” is better than beating an inferior team…my first statement would be “any given Friday” anyone is beatable and I used TC as an example because they won zero non district games yet most thought they a shoe in to make playoffs…why? As I said earlier without maxpreps making there algorithm public it would seem scheduling IMG/STA etc etc and going 0-7 non conference means you should get in? I’m just pointing out what I see as a flaw in the system where not only does TC get in but ahead of teams with “winning” records seems a bit unfair 

  3. You talk like you related to someone on the TC coaching staff my guy! Harmony is the 8 seed yet has more wins (4) against teams with winning records than TC has total! Yes TC played 8 playoff teams and beat one while harmony played 5 playoff teams and won won twice! I’m still arguing that you should not be rewarded for LOSING 

  4. 1 minute ago, 181pl said:

    To play out this moronic logic, if say FAU schedules Alabama, Clemson, Ohio State, Georgia, USC, Penn State, and Oregon and loses every game, but beats the avg teams on its schedule, some of you would say they deserve a shot in say a 12 team ncaa playoff?

    That’s my logic! A team that did not win ONE non conference game is talked about like a shoe-in state playoff team that some people credit as “established top area team” yes I’m looking at you Columbia! Who have they beaten? I’ll wait….Martin county who at 7-2 has played a horrible schedule? I mean yes they beat Vero after Veros QB goes down…but 3-6 and we act like they a shoe-in playoff team with ZERO quality wins! So what quality LOSSES a thing now?

  5. The local paper had an article, behind pay wall, arguing that TC deserves a playoff spot due to quality of opponents it lost too this season…they finished 3-7 with Wins over Fort Pierce Central, Martin county, and Centennial and losses to Chaminade, Jesuit, STA, Kissimmee Osceola to name a few….what do you guys think? I feel it’s like arguing that Vanderbilt should make a bowl game due to the quality of opponents they lose too every season….if they had beaten one other district opponent they would be in as district champ! Just curious if SOS should count more than wins or if close losses are better, in your opinion, then wins against “inferior” opponents 

  6. Again let me reiterate that I’m not downplaying or minimizing TC…they should have beaten Vero! And anyone who thinks Vero, after losing a 4* QB committed to SMU, and the backup who got all the snaps leading up to the game is a top 10 team in any division in football is belittling the QB position! Vero is a 75% downfield pass team trying to run that offense with a 5’7” 140lb kid that takes all he’s got to throw the ball…so I stand by my statement Vero is NOT a top 10 team right now

  7. 3 hours ago, ColumbiaHighFan2017class said:

    Absolutely

     

    In fact they dominated a good Martin County team that beat Vero Beach and nearly won the district title over them 

     

    If they had gotten into the playoffs every team in the region would have been potentially facing the most dangerous 8 seed in the state of Florida

    Pump the brakes a minute…Vero beat TC with there 3 string QB and Vero is not a top 10 team in 4s… and I watch them play ALOT! So don’t try to make TC out to be world beaters! 

  8. I’m not going to defend Veros scheduling but at the same time TC is a loss to Chaminade Madonna away from not making playoffs…so playing a tough schedule and not getting in playoffs is worse, in my opinion, then playing a moderate schedule and getting in! Also Vero did beat Chaminade a couple yrs ago 21-0! And they did schedule Venice but the hurricanes those years made that impossible 

  9. 5 minutes ago, ColumbiaHighFan2017class said:

    Martin County is a bit underrated honestly

     

    But they definitely aren't Sanford Seminole, Osceola, STA or Jesuit either 

     

     

    Martin county and John Carroll both a bit underrated in this area! Both quality teams BUT Vero should have handled them 

  10. I can only speak for myself but I never thought Vero was a state caliber team! Defense hasn’t been good enough at all three levels to be considered state caliber in a number of years! Offense can’t run the ball to save their lives and you can’t focus all your offense on one guy! 

  11. 12 minutes ago, Dr. D said:

    This is the current 4S classification (66 teams) divided into 8 districts of 8/9 teams.  Numerous states use a setup like this and have adjacent districts play 1 vs. 4, 2 vs. 3, 3 vs. 2, 4 vs. 1, in the first round of the playoffs.  This would result in the same number of teams as currently make the playoffs.  If you can't finish 4th or better in an 8-team district, you don't deserve to be in the playoffs.  And it is decided on the field, not by some computer algorithm in California.

    4-S Districts1024_1.jpg

    I can only speak for district 8 but I would not have a problem with that…longest distance game Martin county and Melbourne..so hour and half maybe 2 by bus 

  12. 49 minutes ago, KeemD321 said:

    Alot of teams who schedule tough I'm sure aren't just doing it for the experience or to try to keep it close. I feel as though the majority are scheduling these games to prepare them for the type of teams or games they will come across deep into the playoffs. Also, I'm sure they feel like they can not only compete but win those games as well. 

    Even with Lake Gibson I'm sure they scheduled those games with the thought that they'll have core players back from the run they made last season and their top player who is the top DB in the nation. Little did they know they would lose those players 

    I agree I’m sorry I was still using Treasure Coast as an example…they play either 4-5 defending state champs to start the year and to break that up you have Kissimmee osceola at their place…but that’s a lot of pressure to put on kids to win second half of schedule! And one key injury and the season could be over…

  13. Guess the issue is what is worth more…curbstomping an inferior team or scheduling defending state champions and HOPE you can keep it close…hard for kids to stay with the process when you getting destroyed by superior teams  week by week…lot easier when you winning regardless of the competition 

×
×
  • Create New...