I continue to emphasize the fact that the rationale used to justfy the current state of affairs most definitely would support this otherwise absurd idea. Right now, the argument is that kids should be able to go wherever they please, based on what they think is best for them. That's it. So, quite obviously, a player playing on a team who's down 35-0 at halftime would benefit by not playing for the team getting blown out, but for the other team. The first such occurence is likely to be a game that is delayed for weather to the following Monday or beyond for processing of paperwork. But, once that first such transfer happens, there will be calls for expediting the process and letting the kid switch jerseys right there and then on that night. The preposterous, stupid nature of it is secondary- perhaps even tertiary- to the rationale guiding the rules.