Quantcast
Jump to content

Sign in to follow this  
LAZ

College FB Worst Win Pct Last 5 Years

Recommended Posts

On the flip side, here are the worst winning percentages by division from 2015-2019. Same rules apply. These teams need some help.

 NCAA D1 FBS (P5) CONF W L Pct
         
Kansas BIG12 9 51 0.150
Rutgers BIG10 13 47 0.217
Oregon St PAC12 14 46 0.233
Illinois BIG10 20 41 0.328
Maryland BIG10 21 40 0.344
Purdue BIG10 22 40 0.355
Arkansas SEC 23 39 0.371
Vanderbilt SEC 24 38 0.387
UCLA PAC12 25 37 0.403
Arizona PAC12 26 36 0.419
         
NCAA D1 FBS (G5) CONF W L Pct
         
UTEP CUSA 11 49 0.183
Texas St SBC 13 47 0.217
Rice CUSA 14 47 0.230
Massachusetts IND 14 46 0.233
Connecticut AAC 15 46 0.246
Kent St MAC 17 44 0.279
San Jose St MWC 18 44 0.290
New Mexico St IND 18 43 0.295
East Carolina AAC 18 42 0.300
Ball St MAC 18 42 0.300
         
NCAA D1 FCS CONF W L Pct
         
Mississippi Valley St SWAC 7 48 0.127
Delaware St MEAC 8 48 0.143
VMI SoC 11 45 0.196
Texas Southern SWAC 11 43 0.204
Houston Baptist SLC 12 43 0.218
Presbyterian BSo 12 42 0.222
Lafayette PFL 13 43 0.232
Missouri St MVFC 13 42 0.236
Ark-Pine Bluff SWAC 13 42 0.236
Rhode Island CAA 14 42 0.250
         
NCAA D2 CONF W L Pct
         
Minnesota-Crookston NSC 2 53 0.036
Simon Fraser (BC) GNAC 2 47 0.041
Shorter (GA) GSC 3 51 0.056
Lincoln (PA) CIAA 5 45 0.100
Missouri Southern MIAA 6 49 0.109
Northeastern St (OK) MIAA 6 49 0.109
Mary (ND) NSC 6 49 0.109
Lake Erie (OH) GMAC 7 47 0.130
Lincoln (MO) MIAA 7 47 0.130
William Jewell (MO) GLVC 9 44 0.170
         
NCAA D3 CONF W L Pct
         
Whittier (CA) SCIAC 4 41 0.089
Maine Maritime NEWMAC 5 41 0.109
Grinnell (IA) Midwest 5 38 0.116
Finlandia (MI) MIAA 5 37 0.119
William Paterson (NJ) NJAC 6 44 0.120
Anna Maria (MA) ECC 6 44 0.120
Thiel (PA) PAC 7 43 0.140
Wilmington (OH) OAC 7 43 0.140
Greensboro (NC) USAS 7 43 0.140
Iowa Wesleyan UMAC 7 43 0.140
         
NAIA CONF W L Pct
         
Montana St-Northern FC 4 50 0.074
Texas College SAC 5 42 0.106
Edward Waters (FL) IND 9 40 0.184
Trinity International (IL) MSFA 10 43 0.189
Kentucky Christian MSC 11 44 0.200
Graceland (IA) HAAC 11 44 0.200
Culver-Stockton (MO) HAAC 12 43 0.218
Missouri Baptist MSFA 12 42 0.222
McPherson (KS) KCAC 12 40 0.231
Union (KY) MSC 13 39 0.250

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is amazing to think that some of these teams are this level of bad. For example, Rutgers is not a surprise to be this bad, but too be that bad that means even their non-conference games they have to be losing. At a certain point, I have to begin to wonder is having a football team worth the cost if we can't be competitive. 

While I get conferences are about helping to build brands, make scheduling easier, helping build rivalries, etc. As always, I am going to suggest the ideas of promotion/relegation on a two year cycle. If you started with a 10 team conferences and took the top 10 from LAZ's other post (Clemson, Alabama, Ohio State, Oklahoma, LSU, Georgia, Wisconsin, Penn State, Notre Dame, Michigan). I think that would be an exciting conference and probably more exciting for a season that college football currently is. 9 games would still allow 3 non-conference games against a traditional rival or a cross-country game of some sort. 
 

As I can already hear the SEC homers upset that 4 Big-10 teams could get in the top conference, well after two years, if they aren't the top, they would move out and somebody better replaces them. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • They used to teach sex ed at Columbia, but they stopped because they needed the car for driver's ed. 
    • They don't teach sexed in Columbia County?
    • For whatever reasons, I see a big difference between high school and college.  I'm glad the NCAA decided to give college spring sport participants an extra year of eligibility . . .  although it appears that the burden will be on the schools to find the money needed to pay for the players who will be returning for an extra year of college (perhaps a full year unless they sit out fall semester), the underclassmen who would be returning anyway,  as well as the new players coming in.   But it was the right thing to do.  And while many of the winter sport athletes (like basketball and gymnastics) missed out on what could have been the highlight of their career (like post-season tournaments), I'm OK with not giving these student-athletes another year of eligibility.  More of a gut call than a logical analysis.  But, while I feel horrible for the high school spring sport athletes, and remain hopeful that they will be allowed to complete their spring sport seasons -- abbreviated as they may be -- I just don't feel right about high school kids postponing graduation to play another season of high school sports.  I just don't think it would be smart/prudent/advisable to put off an entire year of college just so they can come back for another year of high school and play another year of  baseball or football (or whatever).   [As an aside, such a decision by the FHSAA would likely require them to change their bylaws and allow kids to play after they've reached the magic age (19?)]. As a practical matter, seniors who participate in spring sports, and who hope to obtain college scholarships in those sports, already have been offered.  Baseball and softball are both big club sports, and tennis is in a category all its own.  Lacrosse is still relatively new in Florida, but the better players already have been identified as juniors and/or based on their club play.  Same with even newer sports like boy's volleyball and water polo.  I'm not really sure where Track & Field and Weightlifting fit in, but I'm guessing the really fast and really strong athletes already have been identified and, if scholarships are available, offered.  I do feel particularly bad for the flag football players if they are not able to complete their seasons, as the sport doesn't exist yet in college (except as a club sport).    I saw something posted the other day quoting a high school baseball coach who claimed it would take at least three weeks of practice to have his team ready to play games again.   Sorry, but I call B.S. on this.   If I were a high school senior who played baseball (like I once was), you could have me game-ready in a week - especially if school was over or almost over and restrictions on practice time, if any, were lifted.  My thought:  once the FHSAA gives teams the green light to hit the field again, give them all a week to practice, have them play one or two games and then go straight into district tournaments, with all seeding be done at random.  Double elimination, if possible.  Yeah, some good teams might get shafted and some seasons are going to come to end way too soon for some teams and a lot of players, but something is better than nothing.  Anyway, I was bored and this topic seemed as good as any to stir things up a little.  I've put my thoughts out there.   What do you guys think?
    • Here is a message from the FHSAA.  They want to extend the season.  It won't happen but at least the FHSAA is not just canceling and trying to find ways.  However in my opinion they are giving false hope and there is no way this will happen.   GAINESVILLE, FL - Given the directive of President Trump to maintain following CDC guidelines through April 30, 2020, combined with Governor DeSantis and Commissioner Corcoran's mandate for schools in Florida to remain closed through May 3, 2020, the FHSAA will continue to follow suit with all scheduled FHSAA meetings, conferences, and athletic events postponed. Pending schools are back in session and afforded the opportunity to resume activities after May 3rd, by Federal, State and Local authorities, the FHSAA will follow the advice and guidance available to us at that time regarding the continuance of all FHSAA spring sports.   In light of the current situation, the FHSAA staff is actively working on creative solutions for the continuance of spring sports, which could extend through June 30th. The FHSAA does understand the hardships caused by COVID-19 and the inability to play spring sports. If we are not able to continue spring sports, the FHSAA is working diligently to create a plan regarding additional eligibility for students who have not been able to participate in spring sports.    The health and safety of our student-athletes, coaches, administrators, officials, fans and local communities are our top priority. We appreciate all member schools' cooperation in following Federal, State and Local recommendations and mandates during this time.   For the most up-to-date information, please visit the FHSAA website. The FHSAA staff will continue to follow the latest developments and will continue to provide updated information as deemed necessary.   The FHSAA office will remain closed following the Governor's recommendation. However, staff will continue to work remotely, during regular business hours. For staff contact information, click here. 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...