Jump to content

Defense Analysis of 6A-8A Teams Playing Tonight


OldSchoolLion

Recommended Posts

Below are the average points per game allowed this season by each of the 6A, 7A and 8A teams still alive in the playoffs.  It's skewed for Miami Central because they have played so few games.  What does the data mean?
 
Well, teams that allow on average more than 14 points per game don't typically win state titles.  That's a fact supported by data over the years.  The data doesn't work the other way.  In other words, the data does not necessarily support that the team with the least points allowed will do better. 
 
For instance, Mitchell has a great average, but that may be due to a very week schedule.  One might ask, "What if a team had a super tough schedule and that drives their average up?"  It doesn't seem to matter.  Many state champions of the past, especially in recent years, have played brutal schedules, yet still do not typically allow more than 14 points per game, on average.  Let's see if any of the teams with higher points allowed averages get exposed tonight on defense.
 
Update:Bolded teams below lost on 12/4.
 
8A
Apopka-10
Miami Palmetto-10
Seminole-10
Osceola-12
Vero Beach-12
Newsome-17
Bartram Trail-20
Lake Mary-20
 
7A
Mitchell-8
Bloomingdale-12
St Thomas Aquinas-12
Fleming Island-13
Niceville-13
Venice-17
Edgewater-20
Tampa Bay Tech-22
 
6A
Gaither-5
Lake Minneola-7
Dunbar-11
Lake Gibson-11
Palmetto-17
St Augustine-18
Miami Central-19 (has only played 3 games on the field)
Columbia-22
Link to comment
Share on other sites


14 hours ago, OldSchoolLion said:
Below are the average points per game allowed this season by each of the 6A, 7A and 8A teams still alive in the playoffs.  It's skewed for Miami Central because they have played so few games.  What does the data mean?
 
Well, teams that allow on average more than 14 points per game don't typically win state titles.  That's a fact supported by data over the years.  The data doesn't work the other way.  In other words, the data does not necessarily support that the team with the least points allowed will do better. 
 
For instance, Mitchell has a great average, but that may be due to a very week schedule.  One might ask, "What if a team had a super tough schedule and that drives their average up?"  It doesn't seem to matter.  Many state champions of the past, especially in recent years, have played brutal schedules, yet still do not typically allow more than 14 points per game, on average.  Let's see if any of the teams with higher points allowed averages get exposed tonight on defense.
 
8A
Apopka-10
Miami Palmetto-10
Seminole-10
Osceola-12
Vero Beach-12
Newsome-17
Bartram Trail-20
Lake Mary-20
 
7A
Mitchell-8
Bloomingdale-12
St Thomas Aquinas-12
Fleming Island-13
Niceville-13
Venice-17
Edgewater-20
Tampa Bay Tech-22
 
6A
Gaither-5
Lake Minneola-7
Dunbar-11
Lake Gibson-11
Palmetto-17
St Augustine-18
Miami Central-19 (has only played 3 games on the field)
Columbia-22

Of the twelve teams left, only: Edgewater, Central, Palmetto and St. Augustine remain from the teams that have given up 14 or more. Of those four, Central has only played four games now, and Edgewater has a huge loss to IMG which skews their average. So, it seems that the trend you noted is playing out as expected. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bartram Trail, Tampa Bay Tech and Columbia all averaged 20 or more points allowed this season-to-date and allowed 35 or more points last night.  Hard to make the Final 4 with those kind of numbers. 

Since 2000, Bartram Trail has lost 14 playoff games in which the opposing team scored 27 or more points. 

Since 2000, Columbia has lost 12 playoff games in which the opposing team scored 27 or more points.

Since 2000, Tampa Bay Tech has lost 11 playoff games in which the opposing team scored 34 or more points. 

All three of these teams average between 24-29 points scored per playoff game(2000-2019).  What's been holding them back, to some extent, is defensive performance in the big games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, OldSchoolLion said:

Bartram Trail, Tampa Bay Tech and Columbia all averaged 20 or more points allowed this season-to-date and allowed 35 or more points last night.  Hard to make the Final 4 with those kind of numbers. 

Since 2000, Bartram Trail has lost 14 playoff games in which the opposing team scored 27 or more points. 

Since 2000, Columbia has lost 12 playoff games in which the opposing team scored 27 or more points.

Since 2000, Tampa Bay Tech has lost 11 playoff games in which the opposing team scored 34 or more points. 

All three of these teams average between 24-29 points scored per playoff game(2000-2019).  What's been holding them back, to some extent, is defensive performance in the big games.

One exception to the solid, stingy defense statistics, is 2012 Apopka which came into the finals giving up about 17 points per game. But in the final it was again the offense that got them through as they won that one with a record 53-50 score and there was about 1200 yards of total offense in the game with Cypress Bay. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DarterBlue2 said:

One exception to the solid, stingy defense statistics, is 2012 Apopka which came into the finals giving up about 17 points per game. But in the final it was again the offense that got them through as they won that one with a record 53-50 score and there was about 1200 yards of total offense in the game with Cypress Bay. 

Apopka is an outlier on multiple fronts, ie winning state titles with more losses than most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OldSchoolLion said:

Apopka is an outlier on multiple fronts, ie winning state titles with more losses than most.

In that sense, they are a little bit like some of the south Florida teams that will start the season slow and hit peak in October through the playoffs. Last year, if you had seen them through game 5, you would have said no way they go more than two rounds in the playoffs unless they get an exceptionally weak draw. And yet they came within seconds of winning the state title when all the smoke cleared. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


  • Posts

    • In a single word, "no." In a lot more words, see the following: (From 2023-24 FHSAA Handbook) 36.2 GENERAL DEFINITIONS 36.2.1 Athletic Recruiting. “Athletic recruiting” is any effort by a school employee, athletic department staff member or representative of a school’s athletic interests to pressure, urge or entice a student to attend that school for the purpose of participating in interscholastic athletics.   and this . . . 36.2.2 Improper Contact. “Improper contact” is contact, either directly or indirectly, whether in person or through written or electronic communication, by a school employee, athletic department staff member, representative of the school’s athletic interests or third parties, such as an independent person, business or organization, with a student or any member of the student’s family, in an effort to pressure, urge or entice the student to attend a different school for the purpose of participating in interscholastic athletics.  See Policy 37.    In fact, if the kid contacts the coach at another school, the coach is not supposed to communicate with the kid other than to refer the kid to the person at the school responsible for admissions.    Best I can tell, there is no exception for being able to reach out to a kid who plays a sport that is not offered by the school that the kid currently attends.  Perhaps there should be . . . but then you'd really be opening Pandora's Box.   
    • So you are not allowed to talk to a kid who is not an active football player currently attending a school that doesn’t have a football team?
    • 1.  Ask around and get the kid's phone number. 2.  Call the kid.  3.  If that doesn't work, DM the kid.  4.  Once communications are established, try to convince the kid to come to your school.  There may be other ways, but I think this would be the easiest way to recruit a kid .  
    • So, after one very brief reading, it appears that the policy will be as follows:   kids, you can cut an NIL deal, but it can't have anything to do with the school you're at or any school that wants you to come there or anyone associated with any of those schools (i.e., boosters). 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...