Jump to content

Lakeland 28, Armwood 13 - FINAL


Nulli Secundus

Recommended Posts


1 minute ago, Nulli Secundus said:

The rain should clear the area by kickoff time.  Hoping for an injury free contest and tune up game for both programs as the season gets underway.  You already know who I'm rotting for.  Who ya got!?

You may be getting old, but I don't think you're rotting quite yet.   :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Nulli Secundus said:

Hell of a way to start the season right?  :D

Lakeland by 7. This is Armwood’s best team in a while. Very strong secondary and I think they return their entire offensive line. I still like Lakeland at home, though. Lakeland should feel confident going into the regular season with a victory here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, VeniceIndianFan said:

Lakeland by 7. This is Armwood’s best team in a while. Very strong secondary and I think they return their entire offensive line. I still like Lakeland at home, though. Lakeland should feel confident going into the regular season with a victory here. 

Same agreement as last season right!?:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Nulli Secundus changed the title to Lakeland 28, Armwood 13 - FINAL

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


  • Posts

    • Independent contractors....   What will go wrong with this?
    • I seriously can't remember how many times I had to do that very thing. Like Nolebull said in another discussion, the kids know kids from other schools and where the "hot hand" is. I never entertained discussions with kids or parents of kids from other schools. I know we lost some good ones because of it but I am ok with that.
    • In a single word, "no." In a lot more words, see the following: (From 2023-24 FHSAA Handbook) 36.2 GENERAL DEFINITIONS 36.2.1 Athletic Recruiting. “Athletic recruiting” is any effort by a school employee, athletic department staff member or representative of a school’s athletic interests to pressure, urge or entice a student to attend that school for the purpose of participating in interscholastic athletics.   and this . . . 36.2.2 Improper Contact. “Improper contact” is contact, either directly or indirectly, whether in person or through written or electronic communication, by a school employee, athletic department staff member, representative of the school’s athletic interests or third parties, such as an independent person, business or organization, with a student or any member of the student’s family, in an effort to pressure, urge or entice the student to attend a different school for the purpose of participating in interscholastic athletics.  See Policy 37.    In fact, if the kid contacts the coach at another school, the coach is not supposed to communicate with the kid other than to refer the kid to the person at the school responsible for admissions.    Best I can tell, there is no exception for being able to reach out to a kid who plays a sport that is not offered by the school that the kid currently attends.  Perhaps there should be . . . but then you'd really be opening Pandora's Box.   
    • So you are not allowed to talk to a kid who is not an active football player currently attending a school that doesn’t have a football team?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...