Announcements
-
Posts
-
By gatorman-uf · Posted
I get the reasoning and don't have a real problem with it, the issue that happens is that it is almost better to be a #2 seed than a #1 seed. -
By Perspective · Posted
Are the district winners still getting the top 4 seeds within each region? If so, it wouldn't surprise me one bit that, within each region, the 'best' district runner-up (who ends up with the 5th seed) will be better than the worst district winner (who ends up with the 4th seed). That said, I do believe that the four district winners within each region should get the top 4 seeds. -
By gatorman-uf · Posted
6 Classifications with wildcards, 4 regions... so 24 #5 seeds, at what percentage of them winning would we have to admit the system should be rethought... or is it only if they get to the regional finals... -
what if they added in that if a team is one spot behind and beat them head to head they jump them. I agree the 5 should be pretty good. Lets see how many 5 seeds win -
By gatorman-uf · Posted
One of the Somerset (#8 seed) and Jupiter Christian... A bigger complaint has to be the #1 seed playing the #5 seed in the second round (the #5 often seems to be a very talented squad and a lot better than the #4) where if it was done based on pure rankings that #5 seed would be a #2 or #3 seed and the #1 seed wouldn't see them to the regional finals...
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
