Jump to content

Pahokee (3-1) @ Palm Beach Gardens (3-1)


561_Fan

Recommended Posts

32-14 Pahokee at the half. Pahokee had a muffed punt that lead to a Gardens score. Gotta clean up the penalties (especially the 15 yarders) because they have extended drives. Hopefully the passing game can get on track in the second half. We graduated our top 4 WRs from last season and this QB/WR group hasn’t jelled yet 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Final. 38-30. Pahokee. After a hour and a half lightning delay the game continued. Pahokee was up 38-14 midway through the third, but Gardens kept fighting.  The refs had a bigger impact on the game than anything. It’s DISGUSTING how Pahokee gets officiated on the road in Palm Beach County…when the refs call games fair, they aren’t close. 
 

On to the next one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, 561_Fan said:

Final. 38-30. Pahokee. After a hour and a half lightning delay the game continued. Pahokee was up 38-14 midway through the third, but Gardens kept fighting.  The refs had a bigger impact on the game than anything. It’s DISGUSTING how Pahokee gets officiated on the road in Palm Beach County…when the refs call games fair, they aren’t close. 
 

On to the next one.

561_Fan, what problems/issues did you have with the officiating? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jambun82 said:

561_Fan, what problems/issues did you have with the officiating? 

Every Gardens scoring drive, there were 2, 15 yard penalties on Pahokee, besides the drive after PK muffed a punt inside their own 20. Any close coverage by a PK defender was a pass interference (refs took away 2 interceptions), but the same plays were no calls on the Gardens defenders. Gardens QB threw the ball out of bound to avoid a sack, no WR close, and the called PI. PK scored in the 4th, offense running off the field, out comes a flag for holding. Second half, Gardens only had 2 penalties called and they were to obvious to ignore (blind side block) and holding when the QB was scrambling around trying throw a pass with under a minute left

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, 561_Fan said:

Every Gardens scoring drive, there were 2, 15 yard penalties on Pahokee, besides the drive after PK muffed a punt inside their own 20. Any close coverage by a PK defender was a pass interference (refs took away 2 interceptions), but the same plays were no calls on the Gardens defenders. Gardens QB threw the ball out of bound to avoid a sack, no WR close, and the called PI. PK scored in the 4th, offense running off the field, out comes a flag for holding. Second half, Gardens only had 2 penalties called and they were to obvious to ignore (blind side block) and holding when the QB was scrambling around trying throw a pass with under a minute left

Thank you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/29/2022 at 9:38 PM, 561_Fan said:

http://www.hudl.com/v/2JLEiA
 

second play was one of the questionable calls

http://www.hudl.com/v/2JLKQ1

Second play (QB zone read) took another TD

http://www.hudl.com/v/2JLtAK

the pick 6 was called back 

I am not an official, but the rushing TD clearly looks like the WR is blocking from behind, would it have made a difference on the outcome of the play, probably not, but the penalty is for doing it. I have seen a lot of those. 

The pick 6 looks like helmet to helmet contact from what I could see (the camera follows the ball very quickly). 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, gatorman-uf said:

I am not an official, but the rushing TD clearly looks like the WR is blocking from behind, would it have made a difference on the outcome of the play, probably not, but the penalty is for doing it. I have seen a lot of those. 

The pick 6 looks like helmet to helmet contact from what I could see (the camera follows the ball very quickly). 

 

The pick 6, they gave Gardens possession, if it was helmet to helmet PK should’ve kept possession. The WR turned the DB on the QB run, the call was holding. The other pick was pass interference 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 561_Fan said:

The pick 6, they gave Gardens possession, if it was helmet to helmet PK should’ve kept possession. The WR turned the DB on the QB run, the call was holding. The other pick was pass interference 

I said helmet to helmet, but wouldn't the call have been roughing the passer, which is why PBG kept possession?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a side note, the grey uniforms look horrible (both PBG's tops and PK's bottoms). I don't understand schools that insist on wearing colors that aren't part of their color scheme.

Yes, my Florida Gators will eventually wear black football uniforms (they were supposed to for this year's Veteran's Day game). I still dislike them as a whole. Give me the classic colors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, gatorman-uf said:

On a side note, the grey uniforms look horrible (both PBG's tops and PK's bottoms). I don't understand schools that insist on wearing colors that aren't part of their color scheme.

Yes, my Florida Gators will eventually wear black football uniforms (they were supposed to for this year's Veteran's Day game). I still dislike them as a whole. Give me the classic colors.

Columbia wore black jerseys against Madison and they looked great! Especially with the purple helmet which Columbia looked good in during late 90s to mid 00s

 

I honestly wish the gators would modernize the helmet decal as it looks so cheap currently, there's so much they could do with it but just having gators written out seems lazy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ColumbiaHighFan2017class said:

Columbia wore black jerseys against Madison and they looked great! Especially with the purple helmet which Columbia looked good in during late 90s to mid 00s

 

I honestly wish the gators would modernize the helmet decal as it looks so cheap currently, there's so much they could do with it but just having gators written out seems lazy

I don't mind the purple helmets, wouldn't even mind going to a true gold (instead of bright yellow). I just don't understand going to grey/black when those aren't your school colors.

As for the script Gators, I agree, I like the old school UF logo for a change up. (1968-78). I am ok with putting an oversized Gator on there. But there is something classic about Michigan, Penn State, Ohio State, Notre Dame, and Bama. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, gatorman-uf said:

I don't mind the purple helmets, wouldn't even mind going to a true gold (instead of bright yellow). I just don't understand going to grey/black when those aren't your school colors.

As for the script Gators, I agree, I like the old school UF logo for a change up. (1968-78). I am ok with putting an oversized Gator on there. But there is something classic about Michigan, Penn State, Ohio State, Notre Dame, and Bama. 

Well the black has a mix of gold and purple in it, I have no issue with color meshing with alternates as long as the school colors are in it, idk if you saw the black but it did have purple and gold in it and at the end of the day the players loved it and high school sports is for the kids at the end of the day so if they happy what's the harm in throwing an alternate color out once or twice a season 

 

I honestly wish the gators would take the UF gator logo and put it on the helmet (like they did the game they wore the gator skin jerseys) 

 

Even if they don't bring the gator skin one back I would like to see that helmet make a return 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always loved the purple helmets for Columbia and even without a decal the purple looks so much better than the yellow one with that LSU knockoff decal

 

I would rather them just get rid of the decal and go with plain helmets like they are with the purple as that's an upgrade over the LSU thing they normally use

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


  • Posts

    • Unions want their members compensated. Districts are slow to compensate teachers and coaches, period. Because ultimately coaches/sponsors are extracurriculars, and not the primary focus of the district despite what some on this board would have you believe. Make it easy, ask your local principal how many teaching openings they have this year in their faculty, ask how much turnover will exist in their ranks this summer, and when they replace them, how many will be highly qualified teachers. Ask the AD how many of their coaches are not highly qualified. The problem from the district and unions' perspective is that there isn't a coaching shortage, somebody always wants to be a coach, but few want to be a math teacher or special education and have their career tied to a test that they have no control over. So just like in the business world, you should pay more to get a person to do the job if nobody is willing to do it. Now if you want to blame the unions, blame them and the districts for not being flexible in salaries for areas of critical needs/shortages. Despite their being a shortage, it isn't a universal shortage. Florida isn't struggling for social studies teachers, PE teachers, or elementary teachers, but secondary math, science, english, special ed (all levels), and world languages. Unions/districts have been reluctant to give extra pay to those subjects to entice people to enter the field, but notice, PE teacher isn't on that list. __________________ To give an idea of what will happen, let's use Madison County (since they were mentioned in an above post). Madison County has 30 head coaches and JV/assistant coaches (including cheerleading). The total amount of salaries that they put to those positions is %66,706. Madison County had a budget of $24 million, so .27% of their total budget. If the proposed bill passes, Madison County would spend 322,500, which represents 1.34% of their budget, about 4.8 times more than current. Now, if the state legislature would simple just add the $260,000 onto the budget, the unions wouldn't care other than making sure that all assistant/jv/and non mentioned coaches from the PB Post article are included. But that isn't what will happen, instead it will be a specific line in the budget from the state legislature, similar to technology or textbooks, money will be required to be spent on the salaries and the state will offer no additional funding (or they will only do it for 2 or 3 years, and when there are new priorities, they will still require it but provide no funding for it). Now, if they offer no additional funding, what happens is that money comes from somewhere in the budget. Considering that that this be part of "teacher salaries", that means it will be pulled from general instructional salaries portion of the budget, which means less money for teachers. So yes, teachers will be upset when the state legislature yet again promises something and then underdelivers (see making the starting salary $47,500).
    • low pay and high expense on housing, while are in the talks, coaches are leaving becuase of resources.  Mike Coe of coffee who was at union county and was a state championship contender year in and out, leaves to go to ga, in 3 seasons they went 15-0 this past yr, have an indoor field being built, makes a ton of money, all his 20 coaches do as well.  resources, the ability to say if we want something, we dont have to sell discount cards and do car washes to buy 10 helmets, we go to people with power/money/boosters/etc and say we need 10 helmets.  look up his twitter, thats where this all came from. camden county and travis roland, same deal.  win a title at mainland and goes fundraising the next week.  or go to camden, takes his staff, make more money, have incredible resources to facilitate what a state championship program should look like, same-read his twitter. id say majority of coaches would work in FL for what coaches rate is, if there were resources available that if you ask for it, its done.  not having to spend the summer selling cards or raffle tickets or whatever they do....
    • The rationale for allowing unlimited transfers, while also allowing an effectively unregulated "NIL" market, is that players should be able to do ANYTHING that helps them better themselves. ANY limits or regulations are said to be immoral, and probably rooted in "white supremacy". Welp, imagine a player playing on a team that's getting their butts kicked. You can't argue that it wouldn't improve his marketability to simply take off his uniform and walk over to the other sideline during the game. NOW, he's on the WINNING team. It would be MUCH better for the player to be on the winning team than to be a no-good loser. And, since "equity" is seen as THE most (if not only) important thing-whereby "equity" is defined and measured by the equivalence (or lack thereof) of outcomes- allowing all of the players on the losing team to simply leave and join the winning team, it all makes perfect sense!* *While bitter sarcasm was employed here, this is not really a joke. Using the current rationale, the above IS consistent with the rationale.
    • Teachers are sometimes their own worst enemies.
    • This is a bit of an incoherent mess. The matter of parents' rights is separate from teacher/coaches pay and teacher certification. All are valid, but distinct, concerns. 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...