Quantcast
Jump to content

Booker T. Washington vs Cocoa who wins?


Recommended Posts


I'm picking BTW in a upset

Cocoa has been so close for so long, i beilive its their time to finally beat the tornadoes and go win state, im locking in my pick for this week, Cocoa wins 34-27 over BTW and advances to Orlando and beats Raines who comes out of the north this friday by beating Sante Fe

Link to post
Share on other sites

well sante fe has surpised by making this far but i see their run ending a game short of title, saw them at a officals clinic back in april, didnt really think much at the time, we played them and handled them during the clinic, but appartly they gotten a lot better since then

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cocoa's has not played a real team for almost 2 months.  The last legitimate team that they played was @ St. Edward in Ohio.  Booker T. Washington has been playing better teams and I think they keep this one within a touchdown.  I will call it 35-28 with Cocoa advancing here.

 

This is Cocoa's best chance since they won three consecutive state titles. However, while I would like the "Central Florida team" to win, I think the easy schedule plus the style of play each team brings to the game works against them. I think this will be very close, could go either way, but in the end, I am going to take BTW, by 3.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is Cocoa's best chance since they won three consecutive state titles. However, while I would like the "Central Florida team" to win, I think the easy schedule plus the style of play each team brings to the game works against them. I think this will be very close, could go either way, but in the end, I am going to take BTW, by 3.

Do Cocoa still runs the ball 75% of the time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. And the irony is that they actually have a quarterback with a good arm. A lot of the coaches in this part of the state are "married" to a disproportionate running game regardless of who gets the snaps.

Wow... I seen some film on cocoa defense and their kind of suspect mainly their secondary... I seen vieara had a field day on them...
Link to post
Share on other sites

They are good up front, not as good in the secondary. That is why I got BTW. They have a promising, young QB and I think that is the difference.

Well I say this the strength of the BTW team is the oline and Dline belive it or not lol... I'll be at the game Friday night so hopefully it's a thriller like it was last year...
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I say this the strength of the BTW team is the oline and Dline belive it or not lol... I'll be at the game Friday night so hopefully it's a thriller like it was last year...

 

That game is another option I did not think about. It could actually be more competitive than Mainland/Central. I need to include this one in my thought process too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Judson had cracked ribs after IMG and still a little off passing the ball. If Cocoa had Jamal Deen again this year I would say Cocoa by 14, but they haven't found that go to guy in the air yet. Should still be a decent game. If BTW's QB has as good of an arm as they are saying then BTW has a real chance to hang some long ones on Cocoa. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Judson had cracked ribs after IMG and still a little off passing the ball. If Cocoa had Jamal Deen again this year I would say Cocoa by 14, but they haven't found that go to guy in the air yet. Should still be a decent game. If BTW's QB has as good of an arm as they are saying then BTW has a real chance to hang some long ones on Cocoa.

He does for a freshman... Crazy!! How good is Cocoa oline? BTW d ends are dangerous... Btw are you gonna make the trip down?
Link to post
Share on other sites

He does for a freshman... Crazy!! How good is Cocoa oline? BTW d ends are dangerous... Btw are you gonna make the trip down?

 

Making the trip down. Should be a thriller. Gonna be a little late though, I have to work then make the drive.

The O-line does pretty well for almost all Jr's. Both teams have lots of speed and toughness. Going to come down to the least mistakes/turnovers. At least Cocoa has a kicker this year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Making the trip down. Should be a thriller. Gonna be a little late though, I have to work then make the drive.

The O-line does pretty well for almost all Jr's. Both teams have lots of speed and toughness. Going to come down to the least mistakes/turnovers. At least Cocoa has a kicker this year.

Lol well it's gonna be young team vs young team.... Well if you do come down don't hesitate to sit on btw side I'll be there
Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Maybe it's just me, but it seems like when a coach lets the backups in a basketball game at the end of a game and the kids try to score, no matter how far up their team is, the announcers and fans don't make a deal about them running the score.  Yet in football, there seems to be this ethical issue.   And us football folks are supposed to be tough.
    • I don’t think you can be accused of running up the score if you have backups and 3rd stringers in. No matter if they are passing it or running a no huddle.  Now they could be questioned about clock management if they are passing it late in the fourth up big, but if they want to get the backups real game reps, I’m not against it.   
    • So, notwithstanding my initial attempt to focus this question on the issue of whether you need to have a certain personnel in a game in order to run the "take a knee" play, nolebull and hornet are addressing the unasked question of whether a team should ever call off the dogs and stop trying to score.  While I think I've heard all the arguments on both side of this issue, I'll go ahead and ask the question:   is there ever such thing as "running up the score?"  Does it matter who's in the game for the team that's way ahead?   Does it matter what plays the team ahead is running?  If so, why?  If 2nd and 3rd string WR's are finally getting into the game, is it bad form for the offense to continue throwing the ball to these kids?   If you contend that the offense can continue to pour it on, no matter what the score and no matter how much time is left in the game, would it be OK for the offense to call unused timeouts to stop the clock and allow them to run one or two more plays in an effort to win the game by 49 points instead of 42?  
    • Pure nonsense. When the 2nd or 3rd string gets into the game with a minute or two left, they shouldn't try to score???????  In the words of the great Head Ball Coach: "it's not my job to stop us from scoring, it's their job".
    • I’m curious to know how many times Nebraska threw the ball in the fourth quarter after the game was out of reach  If the team winning by a large margin has to run the ball to not be accused of running up the score then shouldnt that apply to the losing team as well?   Because what kind of backwards shit would you be playing if you said one team is allowed to conduct their offense however they see fit but the other team has to run it the way we choose to not be accused of bad sportsmanship?  I miss seeing 110-0 scores like in the past. 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...