Jump to content

CAI 35, Lakeland 34


Longtime Observer

Recommended Posts

The game winning play was a blocked FG returned for a TD when Lakeland led 34-29. It was a very easy blocked FG. Knights also had a pick-six. CAI deserved the win, no doubt. Lakeland was without 3* Carlos Mitchell, 3* D'marius Rucker, top big play WR Rick Penick, starting DE  Jack Proctor and backup RB Jordan Henderson. Too many key players out, playing before a flat crowd. The 27-10 lead Lakeland enjoyed in the 2nd quarter probably also led an immature group to let up. For those wondering, my fear that QB Evans Chuba would return didn't happen. So, this was the same CAI team that played all season prior...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


20 minutes ago, Jullian said:

Loses don’t care who wasn’t playing. Loses don’t care how you lost. 
losses don’t care how much u lost by. 
Losses don’t care who you lost to. 
3 losses are now officially a final. 
There are no asterisks by 3 losses. 
(see Central), Lakeland……..

To sum it up, Lakeland is good, but not outstanding this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, DarterBlue2 said:

To sum it up, Lakeland is good, but not outstanding this year. 

Correct. I do think that, at full strength and with the team at a high morale, they're probably the best in 4S. BUT, I think the losses have or will adversely affect morale. If things start to go badly, this group is more likely to cave. Very few of the key players have much experience with winning while playing a lot. Either they rode the bench last year, or they transferred from less than stellar programs. Had they experienced only winning thus far (even if against a soft schedule), morale would be high and they'd maximize their abilities. Now, there is a lot of second guessing and doubt setting in. You're much better off as a team having people say things like "that team you just blew out isn't any good!" then "you guys just lost again?!?"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Longtime Observer said:

Correct. I do think that, at full strength and with the team at a high morale, they're probably the best in 4S. BUT, I think the losses have or will adversely affect morale. If things start to go badly, this group is more likely to cave. Very few of the key players have much experience with winning while playing a lot. Either they rode the bench last year, or they transferred from less than stellar programs. Had they experienced only winning thus far (even if against a soft schedule), morale would be high and they'd maximize their abilities. Now, there is a lot of second guessing and doubt setting in. You're much better off as a team having people say things like "that team you just blew out isn't any good!" then "you guys just lost again?!?"

 

You are probably right in that if Lakeland does not win out there is likely a huge phycological component to it. From watching them on video and in person, they have the talent. But if there is a lot of self doubt, then the Gainesville team may take you out at their place. I always tend to have my doubts about Gainesville teams, mostly because they have made state title games only sporadically in the last 20+ years and when they have have lost by big margins.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, DarterBlue2 said:

You are probably right in that if Lakeland does not win out there is likely a huge phycological component to it. From watching them on video and in person, they have the talent. But if there is a lot of self doubt, then the Gainesville team may take you out at their place. I always tend to have my doubts about Gainesville teams, mostly because they have made state title games only sporadically in the last 20+ years and when they have have lost by big margins.  

I gather Buchholz has more of a monopoly on local talent than those other Gainesville teams. They appear more dominant than those other teams were. Dreadnaught fans have to hope the team gets healthy, and then breaks out of being down in the dumps and starts playing angry. This has seemed to be one of those dreaded "nice guys" team. Granted, that's now the norm more than anything else. But, that's why hungry teams that play "with their hair on fire" have a great shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Longtime Observer said:

The game winning play was a blocked FG returned for a TD when Lakeland led 34-29. It was a very easy blocked FG. Knights also had a pick-six. CAI deserved the win, no doubt. Lakeland was without 3* Carlos Mitchell, 3* D'marius Rucker, top big play WR Rick Penick, starting DE  Jack Proctor and backup RB Jordan Henderson. Too many key players out, playing before a flat crowd. The 27-10 lead Lakeland enjoyed in the 2nd quarter probably also led an immature group to let up. For those wondering, my fear that QB Evans Chuba would return didn't happen. So, this was the same CAI team that played all season prior...

I'm getting 2003 vibes.  I'm waiting for the wheels to fall off and the Naughts lose to the winless Red Devils.  Please don't blow that game! :lol:

F3QpsyKW4AAnYFr?format=webp&name=small

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Nulli Secundus said:

I'm getting 2003 vibes.  I'm waiting for the wheels to fall off and the Naughts lose to the winless Red Devils.  Please don't blow that game! :lol:

F3QpsyKW4AAnYFr?format=webp&name=small

Have to love "Priviledged Dreadnaughts" haha

I don't know about the mood, but this is really not like 2003, other than the fact that the team is fast but light/small. This has been the hardest regular season trio of games they've ever played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A legendary foundational head coach of more than 40yrs has stepped down. It's not that unusual for a program to recalibrate to continue with a dynasty. Jax Bolles also fluttered a bit when their legend moved on. Lots of talent in Polk county. Let's see if the new guy too can consistently bring them home.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dan in Daytona said:

A legendary foundational head coach of more than 40yrs has stepped down. It's not that unusual for a program to recalibrate to continue with a dynasty. Jax Bolles also fluttered a bit when their legend moved on. Lots of talent in Polk county. Let's see if the new guy too can consistently bring them home.    

I think he made his job much more difficult by scheduling Norland and SJP. Last year's team should've had games like those. He's done a very good job with the passing attack. But, most of the hallmarks of Castle's teams are gone. There are some situations where this is good, and others where it is not. I'd bet Castle would've run off-tackle on 4th and goal up 34-29 late. Probably wouldn't have scored without their top two backs carrying it. but CAI wouldn't have been strolling down the field untouched for the game-winning score, either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


  • Posts

    • Is Glades Central this year 
    • Muckboy here!!! GC Raiders all day!!!! Let's go Raiders!!!!
    • My enthusiasm for the upcoming season is tempered by the reality that 95% of teams have no chance of winning a state championship.  I personally don't feel this is good for the long-term health of Florida high school football, but others may disagree.  I don't want to rehash the Metro-Suburban argument, but I foresee a large number of blowouts in the playoffs this year. Here in northwest Florida, a great season is when several teams make it to a Region final game.  In the current environment, the odds of a team from northwest Florida winning a state title are almost zero, maybe once in 10 years if the stars align perfectly.  So it is a matter of adjusting expectations and enjoying the spirit of high school football where it exists.  Yes, there are a handful of transfers in these parts, but generally there is a "community" feel to the competition.  Here, attendance is generally very good, rivalries are intense, the bands are robust, and the players play hard, even if they are not the most talented. I will be rooting for some underdogs across the state to make a run this year, but the reality is the usual suspects will likely dominate again.  Good luck to each of your teams!  One month until kickoff...  
    • You right and I think coaching plays a part as well. You see Teddy Bridgewater is back at his high school Northwestern and they've gotten tons of transfers in
    • So, let's break this down.  Schools cannot control what their fans do, but schools can be punished if certain of their fans break the rules.  Is this fair?  I don't know.  But it is the way the rules are written.  If you start sending out text messages to kids suggesting they 'come play for Venice,' and you are not a representative of Venice's athletic interests, no one gets into trouble.  Although you may lose a few friends in Lakeland.   Can a kid who receives multiple text messages decide to selectively turn in certain teams, but not others?  Yes.  Does that happen?  Not in my experience.  To the contrary, kids/parents that have been a part of the shady underworld of high school recruiting/transferring tend to do whatever they can to stay quiet and under the radar for fear of getting caught in the punishment net.  As I have said many times (not necessarily on this site), most kids who get contacted by other schools take it as a compliment.  It makes them (and their parents) feel good.  "Dang, look at all these other schools/coaches that want me/my son to come play for them.  That's pretty cool. They're nice guys; why should I turn them in?"  And if the kid or his parents are the ones reaching out to other schools to gauge any interest that other schools might have, well, those are going to be the last kids/parents to want to turn anyone in.  With all due respect, it appears to me that you are trying to make the argument that the existing rules need to be changed.  That may be true.  But, as you have seen with NIL, once the camel gets his nose in the tent, the rest of the body is sure to follow.  Or you can go with the Pandora's Box analogy.   Either way, it'll get crazy. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...