Jump to content

Hudson 18, Williston 49 - final


nolebull813

Recommended Posts


  • nolebull813 changed the title to (7-0) Hudson 6, (7-0) Williston 0 - early 1st
  • nolebull813 changed the title to (7-0) Hudson 6, (7-0) Williston 8 - early 1st
  • nolebull813 changed the title to (7-0) Hudson 6, (7-0) Williston 15 - end 1st

McDonald has gotta get some offers. This guy is a man playing against boys. He’s got close to 200 yard rushing. Ripped off a 60 one just now. 
 

And it’s not even about the competition. His vision is outstanding. He’s patient and find the hole and just explodes.

Williston up 22-6 two minutes left in the half 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • nolebull813 changed the title to (7-0) Hudson 6, (7-0) Williston 22 - halftime
  • nolebull813 changed the title to (7-0) Hudson 12, 7-0) Williston 22 - early 3rd
  • nolebull813 changed the title to (7-0) Hudson 12, 7-0) Williston 35 -early 4th
  • nolebull813 changed the title to (7-0) Hudson 18, 7-0) Williston 35 -early 4th
  • nolebull813 changed the title to (7-0) Hudson 18, 7-0) Williston 42 -early 4th
  • nolebull813 changed the title to Hudson 18, Williston 49 - final
3 hours ago, nolebull813 said:

Refs steal a TD from Williston. 50 yard TD pass taken away on 4th down due to phantom ineligible man down field. Williston had 3 holding penalties on the drive too. They probably got 10 penalties in the first half alone 

Why do you feel that the officials "stole" a touchdown from Williston? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Jambun82 said:

Why do you feel that the officials "stole" a touchdown from Williston? 

Because I didn’t see one person ineligibly downfield, and since it was on 4th down, it was a turnover on downs. Not a replay the down. Williston brought their own TV and was recording the game so they could show whatever unit wasn’t on the field what was going on last drive. They showed a ref the play on the screen during a timeout trying to ask where the ineligible man was and the ref just shrugged his shoulders and walked away. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, nolebull813 said:

Because I didn’t see one person ineligibly downfield, and since it was on 4th down, it was a turnover on downs. Not a replay the down. Williston brought their own TV and was recording the game so they could show whatever unit wasn’t on the field what was going on last drive. They showed a ref the play on the screen during a timeout trying to ask where the ineligible man was and the ref just shrugged his shoulders and walked away. 

Nolebull813, officials are not allowed to view videos during the game. Also, ineligible man downfield is not a loss-of-down foul in NFHS rules. Did the officials replay the fourth down, or was there a turnover on downs after the penalty enforcement? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jambun82 said:

Nolebull813, officials are not allowed to view videos during the game. Also, ineligible man downfield is not a loss-of-down foul in NFHS rules. Did the officials replay the fourth down, or was there a turnover on downs after the penalty enforcement? 

He wasn’t viewing it officially: this was a sideline TV that Williston brought with them. 
 

it was fourth down, and they threw a touchdown pass. It was ruled a catch and a touchdown. Then out of nowhere, a ref throws a flag, and says ineligible man downfield. Then, instead of replaying the down, Hudson’s offense comes onto the field.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, nolebull813 said:

He wasn’t viewing it officially: this was a sideline TV that Williston brought with them. 
 

it was fourth down, and they threw a touchdown pass. It was ruled a catch and a touchdown. Then out of nowhere, a ref throws a flag, and says ineligible man downfield. Then, instead of replaying the down, Hudson’s offense comes onto the field.. 

The official should still not have viewed the video. It sounds like the foul, it there even was a foul, was enforced incorrectly. Was this a home game for Hudson or Williston? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Jambun82 said:

The official should still not have viewed the video. It sounds like the foul, it there even was a foul, was enforced incorrectly. Was this a home game for Hudson or Williston? 

Hudson at home. The ref was standing over by Willistons sideline near where the TV was. The coaches for Williston hollered at him to look at the TV. You could tell they were showing him that play. He turned around looked at the TV for a few seconds and then shrugged his shoulders and walked away. He wasn’t standing there debating it with them. They knew nothing could change they just wanted to let a ref know they blew the call. He wasn’t standing there like he’s at a booth review. The TV was pretty big. It wasn’t hard to look at if you turned around on that sideline. Lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, nolebull813 said:

Hudson at home. The ref was standing over by Willistons sideline near where the TV was. The coaches for Williston hollered at him to look at the TV. You could tell they were showing him that play. He turned around looked at the TV for a few seconds and then shrugged his shoulders and walked away. He wasn’t standing there debating it with them. They knew nothing could change they just wanted to let a ref know they blew the call. He wasn’t standing there like he’s at a booth review. The TV was pretty big. It wasn’t hard to look at if you turned around on that sideline. Lol. 

The official should have told the coaches that he is not allowed to look at the video, and if the coaches don't not stop talking about the video, then an unsportsmanlike conduct foul will be enforced on the Head Coach. Officials CANNOT look at videos during a game under any circumstances, and if the coaches do not understand this, than they need to be made to understand through a penalty, and possible ejection of the Head Coach if this unacceptable behavior continues. Are Hudson and Williston High Schools relatively close to each other, distance wise?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jambun82 said:

The official should have told the coaches that he is not allowed to look at the video, and if the coaches don't not stop talking about the video, then an unsportsmanlike conduct foul will be enforced on the Head Coach. Officials CANNOT look at videos during a game under any circumstances, and if the coaches do not understand this, than they need to be made to understand through a penalty, and possible ejection of the Head Coach if this unacceptable behavior continues. Are Hudson and Williston High Schools relatively close to each other, distance wise?   

No, not very close. But not like Orlando to Tally far. More like Orlando to Daytona.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


  • Posts

    • As reported by Josh on this site, Sumner's head football coach, Alonzo Ashwood, was dismissed.  No reason for the dismissal was given, but it certainly wouldn't have been based on the team's on-the-field performance.   I've got a hunch the coach crossed one of those pesky rule lines, perhaps one too many times, and left the principal with little choice.   Again, just speculation on my part.   It'll be interesting to see what repercussions this has for the Stingrays.   Here's a link to Josh's article: http://floridahsfootball.com/2024/05/20/alonzo-ashwood-dismissed-at-sumner-after-four-seasons-per-report/
    • Vero’s offense struggled the entire game, the lone score came on a scoop and score via a fumble. White showed the characteristics of a presumed first year starter. His ability is there no doubt, he’ll just need to settle into the starting role.    West Boca was much more effective- leaning on their 4* running back Javian Mallory, can see them having another good year. They would have probably won the game had it gone a little longer.   
    • If all the talk from the head coach about Dillard being bigger and better this year and how last year in his first year was a trial and error for him, it better be an easy dub. Lol
    • As For my Dillard panthers , this will be a huge test for us before things crank up for real in the next few months.    right now Dillard will be coming in this game with a lot of questions. Whose gonna be the Starting QB after a lot of controversy in last year playoff lost to ely where the fans and some of the players felt the sophomore back up should have replaced the junior starter after constantly turning the ball over.    the panthers also will be debuting a new OC & a new DC for the 2024 season. Last year while the defense was average to above average. Our offense appeared to be very basic & vanilla with No real offensive schemes to get the playmakers open.    we’ve gotten a few transfers in & promoted a few great players from JV to varsity. & with this being year 2 of Dillards new head coach & being placed in a new district I’m interested to see the adjustments & progressions in this season vs last season.    this has the make to be a very good game if the weather permits for all 4 quarters, but until proven otherwise I’m going to take the knights in this game in a final score of    DILLARD 21 MONARCH 28 what do you guys think of this matchup @nolebull813 @FBGUY1989 @cribboy305
    • it’s interesting how times have changed. About 10 years ago on back monarch used to be one of the doormats when it came to football, along side other teams in that area such as coral glades, Coral Springs, taravela to name a few.    but in the last 2 years the knights football program has made some serious strides. In 2022 they finished (9-3) with a 2nd round playoff overtime loss to palm beach gardens.    in 2023- the knights finished (11-3) making it all the way to the state semis where they lost 51-21 to the mandarian mustangs.   this year the knights feel they have the team to go all the way with a huge O-Line & D-Line, 2 3* star receivers both stand at 6’3 & 6’4 respectively. To add to that they also have a dynamic C/O of 2027 Dual Quarterback in Jack Spader who can make plays at a high percentage with his hands or his feet ; which is why the knights are going to have one of the most prolific offenses in the state this year. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...