Quantcast
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This game has the feel of the year Dfb put it on sta to go 10-0. While I pray their field is finally up to par i see this being a very good game.

it can go either way lot of bragging rights at stake for the winner for Dfb this year it’s championship or bust. Is the year for the bucks ...time will tell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, “PANTHER NATION(CODE BLUE) said:

Or Buford may not be that good this year but hey we will see 

Buford is 4-2 and the only teams they've lost to are DB and Archer, one of the better teams in GA. I think they're good lol.

Either way, I'm taking Deerfield. I still think they need to show me in the playoffs, but so far so good for them this season

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, DB4 said:

Buford is 4-2 and the only teams they've lost to are DB and Archer, one of the better teams in GA. I think they're good lol.

Either way, I'm taking Deerfield. I still think they need to show me in the playoffs, but so far so good for them this season

While i agree Buford is good they probably aren't as strong as some of the previous teams they had (they have had some years where they were arguably top 5 in GA even though a lot in GA wouldn't admit it because they feel the only elite teams are in 7a Which is their large school class) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, gatormike20 said:

This should be a good game. With St Thomas getting handled by Central I have to think they will have something to prove! DFB is very good but I'll say St Thomas by a field goal !!!

I thought that same idea and if it was at STA i would pick them to rebound but playing in pot hole field at DFB is going to be tough

 

DFB in a low scoring game (like 2015)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, ColumbiaHighFan2017class said:

I thought that same idea and if it was at STA i would pick them to rebound but playing in pot hole field at DFB is going to be tough

 

DFB in a low scoring game (like 2015)

Deerfield's field is not as bad as reputed. It will come down to which team is better. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...



  • Posts

    • There is no perfect system.  But, as you point out, I've never been one of those who says the whole playoff system should be geared up in hopes of have the two "best" teams in each region playing in each of the four regional finals.   There are just way too many factors to make that determination and way too many things happen along the road to a regional final game (upsets being just one of those things).  How many times do the top 2 seeds in a tennis tournament end up matched up against each other in the finals? How often do you see four # 1 seeds make the NCAA Final Four in basketball or hockey?  How often do you see the #1 seed in the AFC and the #1 seed in the NFC square off in the Super Bowl? More often than not, the cream ultimately rises to the top, but I just don't think it's worth the effort in high school football. 
    • no I said I was shocked you didn't have them higher.  I would have.  
    • Fort Myers girls basketball: State champs '16, '17 and '18.  Semi-finals '15 and '19.   Softball:  State champs '17 . Semi-finals '18 and '19.    
    • And many coaches and AD's have the same feeling and that's why when it was offered last cycle to remove the district champs getting top 4 guaranteed they fought it   But if you feel that way you can't them turn around and say the fhsaa isn't ensuring the best matchups are taking place if you also want the district champs to be guaranteed a top 4 seed, just the reality of it (yes I know you didn't say that specifically yourself, I'm just pointing out the flaw in the line of thinking when people out there try to play both ends of the fence)   Just like many of us knew when the Miami district of death was around that Miami Central, Miami Northwestern and Carol City were the best 3 teams in the entire region but only one would have a seed in the top 4
    • I understand your point.   From my perspective, it just shows the fallacy of trying to determine who the "best" teams are before the playoff games have been played.    Again, I see your point, but I'd have a tough time seeding a district runner-up over all the district winners except for one and giving a district runner-up the home-field advantage over all the district winners except for one.  Winning a district ought to count for something and penalizing a district winner (with a lower RPI and, therefor, a seeding worse than a district runner-up) because the other teams in its district had a bad year just doesn't sit right with me. 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...