Jump to content

Cocoa vs Cardinal Gibbons-Live


Dan in Daytona

Recommended Posts


8 minutes ago, Dan in Daytona said:

Two very good teams. It could have gone either way. Edge CG, they were better tonight. 

Keem, thanks for letting me watch the game...I couldn't do both....great work

No problem. Both teams played their hearts out. Hope they don't question whether they should've went for 2 on their second touchdown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Cat_Scratch said:

Maybe next year we can get the game set Municipal Stadium in Daytona.

Cat, that was a joke, right ?  The last two contracts Daytona had with the FHSAA were broken by the city and cut short because they lost money and didn't want to continue losing money. A private marketing company (DMI) now has a long term lease on the stadium. I think they are smarter than the city, but you never know...... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great game to be at. Gibbons had to go back to the run game. Tigers pass D was tremendous. Chiefs pass rush was solid. I believe 6 sacks. Moss, RB for Cocoa, was shifty & fast. Their QB was solid too. Both OL’s solid. It would b nice if there could b a couple more close, hard fought games by the end of Saturday night.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jullian said:

Great game to be at. Gibbons had to go back to the run game. Tigers pass D was tremendous. Chiefs pass rush was solid. I believe 6 sacks. Moss, RB for Cocoa, was shifty & fast. Their QB was solid too. Both OL’s solid. It would b nice if there could b a couple more close, hard fought games by the end of Saturday night.....

No , blowout times, maybe venice game will be close,  but central,  jesuit and st thomas scoring 50 plus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...



  • Posts

    • In a single word, "no." In a lot more words, see the following: (From 2023-24 FHSAA Handbook) 36.2 GENERAL DEFINITIONS 36.2.1 Athletic Recruiting. “Athletic recruiting” is any effort by a school employee, athletic department staff member or representative of a school’s athletic interests to pressure, urge or entice a student to attend that school for the purpose of participating in interscholastic athletics.   and this . . . 36.2.2 Improper Contact. “Improper contact” is contact, either directly or indirectly, whether in person or through written or electronic communication, by a school employee, athletic department staff member, representative of the school’s athletic interests or third parties, such as an independent person, business or organization, with a student or any member of the student’s family, in an effort to pressure, urge or entice the student to attend a different school for the purpose of participating in interscholastic athletics.  See Policy 37.    In fact, if the kid contacts the coach at another school, the coach is not supposed to communicate with the kid other than to refer the kid to the person at the school responsible for admissions.    Best I can tell, there is no exception for being able to reach out to a kid who plays a sport that is not offered by the school that the kid currently attends.  Perhaps there should be . . . but then you'd really be opening Pandora's Box.   
    • So you are not allowed to talk to a kid who is not an active football player currently attending a school that doesn’t have a football team?
    • 1.  Ask around and get the kid's phone number. 2.  Call the kid.  3.  If that doesn't work, DM the kid.  4.  Once communications are established, try to convince the kid to come to your school.  There may be other ways, but I think this would be the easiest way to recruit a kid .  
    • So, after one very brief reading, it appears that the policy will be as follows:   kids, you can cut an NIL deal, but it can't have anything to do with the school you're at or any school that wants you to come there or anyone associated with any of those schools (i.e., boosters). 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...