Jump to content

Recommended Posts


Posted
2 hours ago, 954gator said:

Lol I get wanting to beat STA, but these Venice refs lol.  Disgrace.  

After some of the games early in the year I would say those officials were not as bad as I had seen at Venice games. Look back at some of the max preps scoreboard and you will see heavy penalties in Venice games. Both sides in fact. I'm one sided so its hard to say but which plays were the most blatant  ?

Posted
  2 minutes ago, Guccifer said:

You started a thread titled "STA" 12 hours ago and it's 8 pages long.

STA is an obsession on this board.

And you're one of it's top consumers.

Of course it's 8 pages

You respond to the same quotes 5 times and inflate your post count 

 

Did Columbiafan just clown someone on padding post counts.  :D

Posted
2 minutes ago, badbird said:
  2 minutes ago, Guccifer said:

You started a thread titled "STA" 12 hours ago and it's 8 pages long.

STA is an obsession on this board.

And you're one of it's top consumers.

Of course it's 8 pages

You respond to the same quotes 5 times and inflate your post count 

 

Did Columbiafan just clown someone on padding post counts.  :D

At least i only use one reply to a quote

 

And when did you join that board 

Posted

I watch most of the game last night only 2 calls I would can suspect .. The one with the punt return when they called a flag on a crack back... Not a block in the back but a crack back and the penalty with the screen play.. Plus the last td Venice scored on was clearly a false start on the whole right side of the line lol.... Good game by Venice...

Posted
4 minutes ago, Zoe Boy said:

I watch most of the game last night only 2 calls I would can suspect .. The one with the punt return when they called a flag on a crack back... Not a block in the back but a crack back and the penalty with the screen play.. Plus the last td Venice scored on was clearly a false start on the whole right side of the line lol.... Good game by Venice...

Isn't crackback blocks now a penalty?

Posted
9 minutes ago, Zoe Boy said:

I watch most of the game last night only 2 calls I would can suspect .. The one with the punt return when they called a flag on a crack back... Not a block in the back but a crack back and the penalty with the screen play.. Plus the last td Venice scored on was clearly a false start on the whole right side of the line lol.... Good game by Venice...

The screen was the one that got me.   Timing was just bad.   Venice played excellent though.   Rooting for them to win it all.

Posted

Because I think I am the only Venice guy who posts I will say this, I don't care much about the outside of talk and whatever the kids on the field play the game. The coaches coach on the field and help the players. 

The STA team that was at Venice last night is MUCH different than the STA that Venice saw last year. That is not anything more than a FACT. 

I will also say the exact same thing about Venice. Not the same team as last year. 

say this -- say that of recruiting and whatever set aside, Venice 27 STA 20.

Its a win. I think I said the exact same thing last year after a loss. The sun will still come up tomorrow, and this 1 game does not define a lifetime. 

 

Posted
43 minutes ago, ColumbiaHighFan2017class said:

Isn't crackback blocks now a penalty?

Idk I seen crackbacks all this year and they never called a crack back penalty.. Usually a block in the back..

Posted
43 minutes ago, 954gator said:

The screen was the one that got me.   Timing was just bad.   Venice played excellent though.   Rooting for them to win it all.

Venice damn near blitz the whole night.. That screen play was there to counter it... 

Posted
4 hours ago, 941football said:

To be honest I am unsure why STA did not run more Draw with the RB ?

STA OC been running a optimis offense this whole year! Make ppl smh all day

Posted

I watched the play probably should have been called a block in the back. While that game was loud and the speed at which it happened maybe the ref called it from an angle that it looked like a crack back. I guess now its all irrelevant. Not like we have replay in high school nor that play be considered for a replay. 

With that said, I don't think that 1 specific play cost STA the game. A bunch of things happened that was their downfall. 

 

Posted

It was a good game to watch. I thought STA was smaller in size than usual and looked very sloppy in the passing game. STA QB was very off that night. Venice played sound defense, and grinding it out on offense. STA had the edge in special teams in my opinion. STA looks like a totally different team from last year when they aren't loaded with D-1 players in every single position. I think the game against IMG helped them a lot in preparation for STA.

Posted
8 hours ago, FLABOY941 said:

It was a good game to watch. I thought STA was smaller in size than usual and looked very sloppy in the passing game. STA QB was very off that night. Venice played sound defense, and grinding it out on offense. STA had the edge in special teams in my opinion. STA looks like a totally different team from last year when they aren't loaded with D-1 players in every single position. I think the game against IMG helped them a lot in preparation for STA.

But they are loaded.. Take a look at their roster again..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...



  • Posts

    • Can't count on FHSAA to do what's right or makes sense so we have to look elsewhere.  I'm still learning about SSAA and I still have questions concerning their bylaws. It's a growing league and I think it will soon surpass FHSAA in membership. 
    • Agree. Everything could be avoided if they did what i said. Consolidate classes down to 4, and force teams who have a set number of transfers participate in an open division. Come up with a number. 5 transfers per year. Whatever number seems right. That way the all star transfer factories can duke it out for one title, and the other 4 playoff brackets will at least be a respectable.    If they create the open division with 7-8 classes next year, every bracket is gonna be beyond embarrassing and make Florida the mockery of the country. You will have glorified 2nd round losers being called state champions 
    • I hope it grows too. To about 500 members! Some of the SSAA teams were or would be playoff teams in FHSAA.  You are correct, they have zero chance of winning a championship in FHSAA.  Some are figured that out. About 400 or so need to come to the same conclusion. 
    • Most Manatee die hards, consider the 1993 title game against Southridge, a nightmare game where anything that could go wrong did in fact do that. I want to say Southridge had 2 kickoff returns for TDs, 1 Punt return for a TD, at least 1 (possibly 2 INTs returned for a TD), I believe there was also a hail Mary at half for a TD. The 1984 19-14 playoff loss to Lakeland, probably burns in die hards guts than the 1993 contest. Manatee was a heavy favorite going into that game, but 2 turnovers inside the Lakeland 10 proved ultimately to be Manatees undoing and denied Manatee any chance at back to back titles
    • I think they are small schools.    Marathon - about 700 (grades 6-12) Coral Shores - under 800 Key West - about 1,300
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...