Jump to content

FHSAA mystery system is a joke


badbird
 Share

Recommended Posts


38 minutes ago, badbird said:

I know it's early and you might say things will work out but the ranking is is a joke and has been for however long they have been using it.  It's better to win close vs a bad team than a close loss to a great team.  

 

Are we also gonna gloss over the fact the FHSAA didn't even bother to fix the classification thing on the drop-down menu as they still got it listed as 1-7a 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Floridaatlantic1 said:

The old system of district winner and runner up was much better 

Yeah let's reward teams in crappy 3 team districts and have over half the schedule completely meaningless

 

May as well INTENTIONALLY lose any non district game because winning those games don't mean a damn thing

 

And you act like you want to reward competition but only want a few games to count? Great hypocrisy there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ColumbiaHighFan2017class said:

Yeah let's reward teams in crappy 3 team districts and have over half the schedule completely meaningless

 

May as well INTENTIONALLY lose any non district game because winning those games don't mean a damn thing

 

And you act like you want to reward competition but only want a few games to count? Great hypocrisy there!

I agree but I'm not sure this one does much much better.  It just keeps 1-9, 2-8 teams out.  It allows shitty teams with inflated records playing other shitty teams to get in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, badbird said:

I agree but I'm not sure this one does much much better.  It just keeps 1-9, 2-8 teams out.  It allows shitty teams with inflated records playing other shitty teams to get in.

Oh I agree MaxPreps rankings are horrible and even worse seems to not only give teams a favorable position based on last season results but also favors teams who are undefeated with pathetic schedules 

 

The last 2 aspects of that weren't as common with the RPI but MaxPreps caters to the teams who hated that they couldn't game the system and go undefeated with weak schedules and were forced to travel to cross town rivals who they "think" are recruiters because they actually win and beat strong teams 

 

I would have at least liked to seen the RPI in action for a year with the current classification changes instead of switching to MaxPreps which seemingly is creating more problems then it solved 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ColumbiaHighFan2017class said:

Anyone who claims to support competition but wants only a few games a year to count towards playoff standings IS A HYPOCRITE!!!

 

NO IFS AND OR BUTS!

 

HYPOCRITE! HYPOCRITE! HYPOCRITE! 

Not a hypocrite...
I believe the FHSAA screwed up classifications to begin with. If they did winner/runner-up, there should be 8 teams per district and 16 districts per class with 128 teams in a classification (assuming no M/S/R split). Top 2 teams in from each district would be perfectly fine. Even if we went to 64 teams per class, 8 districts with 8 teams would be fine.

It would allow you to play 7 must win games. It also allows you to play 3 games that you might play for various reasons like they are a traditional rival (where one team has dominated the other) or it might be a national showcase game (that you might lose) or the coach wants to revisit a school he coached/played at. I don't think every game has to be life and death and I think if we insist on it, it is why schools like Suwannee don't want to play Columbia (pre-2022) or St. Augustine and Palatka were going to cancel rivalry game.

Of course, if we went to my promotion/relegation system a lot of this goes away.
7A - 32 teams (no districts, all teams make playoffs, must play 7 games against other 7A teams, FHSAA should help with travel costs over 2 hours during regular season, RPI/MaxPreps for seeding).
6A - 32 teams(no districts, all teams make playoffs, must play 7 games against other 6A teams, FHSAA should help with travel costs over 2 hours during regular season, RPI/MaxPreps for seeding).
5A - 64 teams (8 districts with 8 teams, 32 teams make playoffs, district champs and wild cards determined by RPI/Max Preps.
4A - 64 teams (8 districts with 8 teams, 32 teams make playoffs, district champs and wild cards determined by RPI/Max Preps.
3A - 128 teams (16 districts with 8 teams, 16 teams make playoffs, district champs only.
2A - 129 teams (16 districts with 8 teams, 16 teams make playoffs, district champs only.
1A - 36 teams for rural classification, only 2 regions (North and South, top 8 in each region).

Every year: 
Top 4 teams from each classification move up (based on the average of previous 4 years RPI/MaxPreps).
Bottom 4 teams from each classification move down (based on the average of previous 4 years RPI/MaxPreps).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, gatorman-uf said:

Not a hypocrite...
I believe the FHSAA screwed up classifications to begin with. If they did winner/runner-up, there should be 8 teams per district and 16 districts per class with 128 teams in a classification (assuming no M/S/R split). Top 2 teams in from each district would be perfectly fine. Even if we went to 64 teams per class, 8 districts with 8 teams would be fine.

It would allow you to play 7 must win games. It also allows you to play 3 games that you might play for various reasons like they are a traditional rival (where one team has dominated the other) or it might be a national showcase game (that you might lose) or the coach wants to revisit a school he coached/played at. I don't think every game has to be life and death and I think if we insist on it, it is why schools like Suwannee don't want to play Columbia (pre-2022) or St. Augustine and Palatka were going to cancel rivalry game.

Of course, if we went to my promotion/relegation system a lot of this goes away.
7A - 32 teams (no districts, all teams make playoffs, must play 7 games against other 7A teams, FHSAA should help with travel costs over 2 hours during regular season, RPI/MaxPreps for seeding).
6A - 32 teams(no districts, all teams make playoffs, must play 7 games against other 6A teams, FHSAA should help with travel costs over 2 hours during regular season, RPI/MaxPreps for seeding).
5A - 64 teams (8 districts with 8 teams, 32 teams make playoffs, district champs and wild cards determined by RPI/Max Preps.
4A - 64 teams (8 districts with 8 teams, 32 teams make playoffs, district champs and wild cards determined by RPI/Max Preps.
3A - 128 teams (16 districts with 8 teams, 16 teams make playoffs, district champs only.
2A - 129 teams (16 districts with 8 teams, 16 teams make playoffs, district champs only.
1A - 36 teams for rural classification, only 2 regions (North and South, top 8 in each region).

Every year: 
Top 4 teams from each classification move up (based on the average of previous 4 years RPI/MaxPreps).
Bottom 4 teams from each classification move down (based on the average of previous 4 years RPI/MaxPreps).

Suwannee doesn't want to play Columbia in ANY sport because they would rather claim we have gang issues in Lake City and garner sympathy even though they have no problem playing teams in Tallahassee or Jacksonville that have gang issues far worse than Lake City and it's not like Live Oak doesn't have its own issues with gang violence

 

 

As for the system I have always preferred wild cards over runner ups because better districts deserve more than 2 teams and having that system in theory will reward teams who play tougher schedules by giving them the ability to get a higher seed Than a team who goes undefeated by getting 10 easy wins against teams they managed to find that were willing to take a blowout for a paycheck

 

And I've argued for years that ever since 1a removed districts that there is no reason they can't do 2 regions instead of 4 which would cut down on a lot of the teams who have gotten in with 2 or 3 wins over the past few years which is only happening because of how small the regions are

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ColumbiaHighFan2017class said:

Suwannee doesn't want to play Columbia in ANY sport because they would rather claim we have gang issues in Lake City and garner sympathy even though they have no problem playing teams in Tallahassee or Jacksonville that have gang issues far worse than Lake City and it's not like Live Oak doesn't have its own issues with gang violence

which is why I said (pre-2022). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Classes shouldn't be based on population, they should be based on team ratings.  Currently, separation by classification results in a handful of bad teams with easy schedules receiving too high of a rating.  Similarly, good teams with hard schedules are lower than they should be.  This is due to scheduling based on population and proximity.  Proximity will always be an issue, but school population size isn't the barrier it once was with transfers and recruiting.  Scheduling by team rating creates the cross-pollination needed to more accurately rank teams

I like Gatorman-UF's proposal, I think it is much better than the current system.

 

What I would do is use the rankings 1-32 to seed the single state championship with regional sub-tournaments also being played.

First round is single elimination, losing teams are relegated to their regional tournaments with a built-in first round bye.  The remaining 16 teams play a bracket placing all 16 teams (this means if you lose, you play for 3rd, lose again, playing for 5th, lose again playing for 7th).  This way, the most competitive teams in the state are playing each other in meaningful games.

For the other tournaments, they could be regional/metro/rural, I'm open to suggestions.  I was thinking Tallahasse area, Jacksonville area, Ocala area, Orlando, Tampa, Naples/Fort Myers area, South Florida area.  They play a 16-team single elimination bracket with spots added by the teams that lose in the first round of the state tournament.  These smaller brackets need to be adjusted based on who is eliminated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share



  • Posts

    • This looks like a legit move to me, not team shopping. 
    • But that's a lot of time & money moving back and forth.  Think about the time it takes to prepare a house to sell it.  Or if it's an apartment, then you have to break the lease and most apartments make you pay in full.  Then the next apartment won't approve you cause you broke a lease. So the REASON for moving is because of work, or just to play on a good team?  
    • I've found I get into fewer arguments when I answer my own questions.  
    • From my perspective, sounds like you answered all your own questions. 
    • I do not know the Knight family, but from what I understand, the move last year from Tampa to the Space Coast was prompted by a job situation with the father (transfer/promotion/new position . . . something like that).  Yes, there was speculation that he might lose his job to the kid who was a freshman last year, but to my knowledge, that had not yet happened.  So, it remains speculation.  Similarly, the move back to the Tampa Bay area also has been prompted by the father's job situation (another transfer/promotion/new position . . . something like that).  Early in my career, I worked with a bunch of bankers and such moves were not unusual in that industry.  I don't know what line of work the father is in, or even if he has been staying with the same company.  But I have known plenty of people who move away from an area (like Tampa Bay) only to decide the grass wasn't really greener elsewhere, and that they miss their friends, family, church, etc., so they return.  Sometimes it would take 4-5 years; sometimes a year.  Anyone on this board who has a son who has played sports would understand this:  if your family had to move, you would look for the best opportunity for your son to succeed at his new school.  You would balance out quality of school, the success/tradition of the particular athletic program your son wants to be involved with, etc.  From an outsider's standpoint, that's how Luke Knight ended up at Merritt Island last year.  Now, for reasons none of us fully know, the family is coming back to the Tampa Bay area.  Did they sell their house a year ago?  Did they buy a new house in Merritt Island?  Or did they keep their Tampa house, rent it out and lease in MI?   Who knows?  I certainly don't.   But, they've made the decision to return to Tampa.  Now it gets interesting.  Do you return to a school where you lead the team to a state championship as a sophomore?  Football aside, would he even be able to return to Jesuit?  I'll go out on a limb and take the position that while Jesuit typically/historically does not allow rising seniors to transfer in, they would have allowed this kid to re-enroll (call it the Pesansky Rule). But now we have to look at from the family's standpoint:  how close was the kid to losing his starting job a year ago?   Regardless, if you're Matt Thompson (Jesuit head coach), you either made the choice to move on to another guy or that choice was made for you.   And that 'other guy' stepped in as a freshman and had success.  And that kid is likely to end up a 4-year starter.  As the head coach, do you want to bring back in the previous starter, bench your rising star (and possibly run the risk of losing him to informal high school transfer portal) or do you stick with stick with the taller, bigger, younger kid who has the potential to break all of Jesuit's career passing records by the time he graduates? I don't know if the dad spoke with Thompson or if they could just see the writing on the wall.  And I think I saw something in the article (before the firewall and/or PDQ ad kept me from reading it all the way through) that indicated the kid would be playing on the same field that he played on in his youth football days.  Nostalgia can be a strong motivating force sometimes.  So, it looks to me like non-football forces brought the family back to the Tampa Bay area and the family did the same thing they did when those non-football forces took them to the Space Coast - they made a school decision that provided their son with the best opportunity to have success.  Just my perspective. 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...