Jump to content

Can fhsaa end the Maxpreps rankings for next year


Floridaatlantic1

Recommended Posts

So I want to get this straight.  Your telling me that a 4-5 team Palmetto is the 9th best team this year.  It seems maxoreps does not count losses if you lose to a solid team at all. They have a 5-4 team lake Brantley rated super high too. What a joke. End this crazy rankings next year and go back to rpi.  The rankings don’t really match up that much anyway when the fhsaa ones come out.  Whole things is maddening because playoffs will be determined by this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


We both agree on this. This system totally lacks transparency. With the RPI you could create a spreadsheet and double check it against the FHSAA calculations. With this you can't for first we don't know how Max Preps comes up with its rankings. But even if we did, as you state, there are huge difference between Max Preps and what the FHSAA converts them to. 

Many programs will feel like they were cheated using this new method which is definitely not an improvement over the RPI method. Heck, while District champs and runner up had its issues, it was better than a system shrouded in secrecy.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, DarterBlue2 said:

We both agree on this. This system totally lacks transparency. With the RPI you could create a spreadsheet and double check it against the FHSAA calculations. With this you can't for first we don't know how Max Preps comes up with its rankings. But even if we did, as you state, there are huge difference between Max Preps and what the FHSAA converts them to. 

Many programs will feel like they were cheated using this new method which is definitely not an improvement over the RPI method. Heck, while District champs and runner up had its issues, it was better than a system shrouded in secrecy.   

I would gladly take the RPI because at least then we could have some transparency

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if the original topic line is a rhetorical question or a factual question, but the proposal to use the MaxPreps ratings in place of the RPI ratings originated from the Football Advisory Committee in January 2022 (9-0 vote).  It was subsequently approved by the FHSAA Board of Directors at their April 2022 meeting (16-0 vote).  Presumably the FHSAA could return to the use of the RPI ratings (or any other ratings system they so desire) for football, if such a proposal was presented to and passed by a vote of the Board of Directors.  Of course, that would require a lot of people to admit they made a big mistake by passing this in the first place.  In other words, they could end the use of the MaxPreps ratings, but I wouldn't bet on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was showing how horrible maxpreps rankings are when they count margin of victory. If you end up with a 4-5 team at number 9 in 4m and another 5-4 team who did not not beat anybody in top 16. Then something is wrong with your  ranking formula. The one team lost 37-7 a week ago and rose three spots in the state. SOS is weighted wayyyyy too heavy in maxpreps.  Go back to rpi which makes sense a lot more than this dumb ranking .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Palmetto is ranked in the FHSAA rankings as the 168th in the state and I would bet they are better than that.  The issue is that there are 9 divisions so when you isolate it to 4M, there just arent that many teams so 9th best seems crazy but look individually at the teams in that ranking and then comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PinellasFB said:

Palmetto is ranked in the FHSAA rankings as the 168th in the state and I would bet they are better than that.  The issue is that there are 9 divisions so when you isolate it to 4M, there just arent that many teams so 9th best seems crazy but look individually at the teams in that ranking and then comment.

If we used the actual MaxPreps rankings (not FHSAA's version of it), then Palmetto is 68th in the state.
In 4M, they would be ranked 9th (using MaxPreps rankings) behind the following teams, instead of 22nd in the classification with FHSAA's version.
1    Columbus (Miami)
2    Seminole (Sanford)
3    Winter Park
4    Apopka
5    Ocoee
6    Lake Mary
7    West Orange (Winter Garden)
8    Palm Beach Central (Wellington)
_____________

Updated, because I assumed that Miami Central was 4M. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to clarify, if you are looking at MaxPreps rankings on their website, that is the normal way they calculate it with margin of victory, etc. They are also taking previous years success into account (or at least I am assuming they do considering Champagnat Catholic is ranked 63rd and they no longer exist as a school). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, gatorman-uf said:

If we used the actual MaxPreps rankings (not FHSAA's version of it), then Palmetto is 68th in the state.
In 4M, they would be ranked 10th (using MaxPreps rankings) behind the following teams, instead of 22nd in the classification with FHSAA's version.
1    Central (Miami)
2    Columbus (Miami)
3    Seminole (Sanford)
4    Winter Park
5    Apopka
6    Ocoee
7    Lake Mary
8    West Orange (Winter Garden)
9    Palm Beach Central (Wellington)
 

Why is Miami Central included in this? Central is in 2M not 4M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, nolebull813 said:

Problem is the people in charge at the FHSAA are super incompetent. So nothing will change until those clowns are out. Until then, you either have to accept the incompetence, stop investing time in HSFB, or go do something about it. 

Maybe but I would rather trust the FHSAA than trust the state government to run it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Dr. D said:

Not sure if the original topic line is a rhetorical question or a factual question, but the proposal to use the MaxPreps ratings in place of the RPI ratings originated from the Football Advisory Committee in January 2022 (9-0 vote).  It was subsequently approved by the FHSAA Board of Directors at their April 2022 meeting (16-0 vote).  Presumably the FHSAA could return to the use of the RPI ratings (or any other ratings system they so desire) for football, if such a proposal was presented to and passed by a vote of the Board of Directors.  Of course, that would require a lot of people to admit they made a big mistake by passing this in the first place.  In other words, they could end the use of the MaxPreps ratings, but I wouldn't bet on it.

All it will take to change it again is a couple of the 'wrong' teams getting screwed by the new system.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


  • Posts

    • There are zero coaches on campus, every single coach left 
    • There is 1,750 kids in the school. That would be their fault if they can’t field a team of 40-50 players. I know it sucks about the mass exodus. I get it. But even though they won’t be competitive for the time being they should at least have enough varsity players returning, JV kids, and newcomers to field a team.    They should have had an assist at coach resume spring workouts, and maybe got in on a jamboree with lesser teams or held an inter squad scrimmage. But to cancel everything seems a bit erratic 
    • From 2018-2021 when Dillard was one of the top 5 teams in broward we got there because on the beginning we schedule within our actual talent on the field, we showed success that we are atleast a avg program being able to take care of business against avg and below avg teams. And with the right personnel we can become above avg and actually contend.    and with that came a undefeated regular season in 2019 with a regional final birth, a undefeated COVID season in 2020 and a Fri county championship and a 1 loss season in 2021 and a second round exit on the road to homestead.    dillard has to get back to that. But scheduling central, chaminade , sta and etc of back dropping each game by 40 is not gonna help the program.    you can say “aye atleast we scheduled them we didn’t back down” like I’ve said several times on here lol. but there’s no moral victories in football. You either won or you lost.
    • I wouldn’t say okay with it because wether they was on the schedule or not I’m bleeding blue & gray all day ready for smoke with which ever team were lining up across.    but as a former player & coach I also understand that when you’re a second year head coach taking over a program that haven’t seen a deep playoff run since 2019 and over the last 5 years they’ve played chaminade 5 times (0-5), norland once (1-0) Central once (0-1) gibbons once (0-1) & on top of that you have a mass exodus of players after the coach before you left ; you have to build your program back up to a contending program before you try to schedule the big dogs of south Florida.    for EX: last year Dillard at STA, GIBBONS & chaminade on the schedule went (0-3) and each lost was by over 20+ the sta loss was 58-0. But those games had to be played because of the last year of the contract.     
    • Will Lake Minneola even have a team come August 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...