Jump to content
ALL BOARD MEMBERS READ: COVID-19 and Politics ×

Apopka at Jones


Recommended Posts

I attended the spring game between these two tonight. The start was delayed by about 40 minutes due to lightening. 

If you like defensive football, then this would have been a doozy and right up your alley. The final score was 10-7 Apopka with it's only touchdown coming off a blocked Jones punt just before halftime that was scooped up and taken to the end zone. Apopka's other points came off Apopka's second possession of the game when a promising drive stalled in the red zone and the kicker managed to split the uprights from about 28 yards out. 

Jones's touchdown which came on their third possession was a beauty as their running back Parker broke a couple tackles and took it fifty yards into the end zone. Unfortunately, it was the only big play of the game for Jones. Late in the game (late third quarter or early fourth), they did get the ball inside the Apopka ten but a forced fumble led to an Apopka recovery in the end zone.

Overall, both teams showed out well. In my opinion, Apopka's line play on both sides of the ball was better than Jones's. I believe both teams should have very successful seasons, as this is the best spring game performance by Apopka since Coach Rolson took the helm after RD's departure. If the team makes normal improvement from here, we should again make a deep playoff run.  

One other matter of note: Apopka only ran one play out of the single wing the entire game. And this was late in the fourth quarter when the objective was to run the clock out. Could this be the end of an era? I guess we will see in September ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm not familiar with Apopka's specific offense.  I'm guessing they have traditionally run the wing-T but suddenly moved away from it this spring or something?  Teams that suddenly change to a modern styled offense usually do so because they are getting hurt by negative recruiting of their kids to come and play for a more modern offense that will showcase their skills better or give them better coaching to reach the next level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PinellasFB said:

I'm not familiar with Apopka's specific offense.  I'm guessing they have traditionally run the wing-T but suddenly moved away from it this spring or something?  Teams that suddenly change to a modern styled offense usually do so because they are getting hurt by negative recruiting of their kids to come and play for a more modern offense that will showcase their skills better or give them better coaching to reach the next level.

Apopka, since 2006, has run a single wing offense. Beginning two seasons ago, it began to incorporate various spread packages into its offense, But it still maintained the single wing as a major package. Personally, I would not necessarily ditch the single wing to the dustbin of history. However, I don't think it should be the only package employed. One drawback is if you fall behind by two scores or more, it is hard to come back. Another is that you lose some of your offensive talent to other schools.

Having a single wing package is an excellent way to give other teams a different look, as well as to run out the clock late in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DarterBlue2 said:

Apopka, since 2006, has run a single wing offense. Beginning two seasons ago, it began to incorporate various spread packages into its offense, But it still maintained the single wing as a major package. Personally, I would not necessarily ditch the single wing to the dustbin of history. However, I don't think it should be the only package employed. One drawback is if you fall behind by two scores or more, it is hard to come back. Another is that you lose some of your offensive talent to other schools.

Having a single wing package is an excellent way to give other teams a different look, as well as to run out the clock late in the game.

they ran a little more spread type stuff 2012ish 2013ish when zack was there, it was for sure a dangerous combo  to see 2x2 and then all a sudden they shift into single wing or vice versa.  i couldnt imagine game planning for the same personnell groupings for a spread em out offense and a smash mouth one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, h8r said:

they ran a little more spread type stuff 2012ish 2013ish when zack was there, it was for sure a dangerous combo  to see 2x2 and then all a sudden they shift into single wing or vice versa.  i couldnt imagine game planning for the same personnell groupings for a spread em out offense and a smash mouth one.

That is exactly right. And, as of the spring inter squad scrimmage, the elements were there to do the same this year. Not being an insider, I don't know whether that option still exists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DarterBlue2 said:

That is exactly right. And, as of the spring inter squad scrimmage, the elements were there to do the same this year. Not being an insider, I don't know whether that option still exists.

Any old timer remember the "Newbie" who had the "inside scoop" on a certain Blue/Black team all the while he didn't realize he was conversing with that teams Head Coach ?  Inside jokes "be damned" but it was hilarious.  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/31/2023 at 10:19 AM, DarterBlue2 said:

That is exactly right. And, as of the spring inter squad scrimmage, the elements were there to do the same this year. Not being an insider, I don't know whether that option still exists.

But like you previously stated, "Summer is long and could yield surprises".  That statement holds true for several teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DarterBlue2 said:

That is 100% correct.

Overall, I like where Apopka is at this point on the space time continuum. 

That timeline for our teams is less than 3 months when we play each other on 08/18 KOC @ Apopka.  We will certainly know more about ourselves after that game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DarterBlue2 said:

 Maybe we can meet up. The Kowboys are a formidable opponent. Hope the weather does not intervene..

Sure did disappoint us last year at that time, so keeping my fingers crossed as this will be a tremendous challenge for our youngsters to prepare for the upcoming season.   Probably will ride up with my son who attends most games with me during the season, so yes would love to meet you.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


  • Posts

    • My question was regarding the bold statement you made that "School Choice" is embraced by the vast majority of parents, particularly in minority families with only a single Mom raising her kids.  And I intentionally highlighted the part that says " particularly in minority families with only a single Mom raising her kids".  You cite some poll B.S about single minority mothers voting him for but gave no concrete reason nor concrete proof why they voted for him, if indeed that truly happened. Were those poll numbers broken down by the various demographics? White, Latino, Black, Asian, rich, poor, middle, straight, gay, etc? Did it show that school choice was the reason single minority mothers voted for him? It could have been any reason, but you choose to draw a strong correlation between school choice/single minority voters as the reason that demographic group voted for him. Of course someone with your abilities you know exactly what they are doing by throwing that out there.      
    • Hate is a strong sentiment and definitely not my feelings towards anyone on this forum.  I am just of the mindset that difference of opinion is healthy and mocking, name calling, ridiculing and yes even hate doesn't help move your point of view forward.  When it descends to that level, it becomes a waste of time to continue to engage that person.  Regarding some of your post, I find it difficult to see some of your attempts at humor to be humorous that's all. 
    • Ray, I know that you have a deep hatred for me, but I really appreciate you contributions to this message board. 
    • Here is an explanation Pinstripes: California, New York, Illinois, and Minnesota are always looking for new residents, Big Shot. 
    • Studies estimate that public schools may lose up to 15% of population as opposed to the 40% number in your question.  In addition, they are funding the student, not the school.   Using your 2000 number when a new public school opens, that number quickly balloons beyond that as the community grows and the excess is moved from several adjoining schools to build a new one.  That seems to imply it was deemed productive at 2000, can handle 2500 so what difference does it make where that excess population goes?  Some leave to charter, Christian or private and the number goes back to the original estimate that it was designed for.  At least, that is the logic my simple mind tells me they are using.   Undoubtedly, there will be additional cost to fund this program.  But I harken back to your original question, why is the FDOE doing this?  Is it remotely possible that many public schools are failing us?
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...