Jump to content

Recommended Posts


Posted

As the end of this article points out, there are still several questions that need to be answered.   At first blush, this whole concept does not appear to have been well or thoroughly thought out.   I'm concerned that someone will start raising questions at the next FHSAA Board meeting and that, in their haste, they'll try to come up with something on the fly, not fully understanding or contemplating all of the unintended consequences that could result. 

Posted

Cocoa, Chaminade-Madonna, Miami Norland, St. Thomas Aquinas, Clearwater Central Catholic, Lake Mary, Gainesville Buchholz and Plantation American Heritage

This is the 8 teams that would have been in an open division.  CCC just lost by 100 to Chaminade.  I like the idea.  Columbiafan if you read this I like the idea.  Best idea FHSAA has had.  I don't like how they pick the 8 teams for the open division. 

Posted
41 minutes ago, badbird said:

Cocoa, Chaminade-Madonna, Miami Norland, St. Thomas Aquinas, Clearwater Central Catholic, Lake Mary, Gainesville Buchholz and Plantation American Heritage

This is the 8 teams that would have been in an open division.  CCC just lost by 100 to Chaminade.  I like the idea.  Columbiafan if you read this I like the idea.  Best idea FHSAA has had.  I don't like how they pick the 8 teams for the open division. 

The original discussion last year proposed "large" and "small" school (above/below 1,500 enrollment) Open Divisions.  Might be a better way to go.

Posted

for the open division, I don’t think it should be based on any sort of hokie ranking. It should be based on a point system. X amount of points for state titles won within the last five years, X amount of points for total playoff wins in the last five years, X amount of total wins over the last five years, X amount of points for winning percentage over the last five years.

I would also exclude all rural teams from the open division. There’s no way that a small rural team would be able to compete with chaminade. Ever.  Not enough of a population to draw from.  

Posted

I know they are not part of FSHAA but why leave IMG out of the conversation, this would be a way to get them into the the fold. If you want to find out the best of the best why leave them out.

Posted
1 hour ago, flabuck said:

I know they are not part of FSHAA but why leave IMG out of the conversation, this would be a way to get them into the the fold. If you want to find out the best of the best why leave them out.

In my opinion, you leave them out because they don't play by the same rules.  They're a glorified prep school that seemingly/openly recruits athletes.   So, now that I think about it, perhaps they aren't all that different than some of the other so-called state powers. 

Posted
20 hours ago, 181pl said:

for the open division, I don’t think it should be based on any sort of hokie ranking. It should be based on a point system. X amount of points for state titles won within the last five years, X amount of points for total playoff wins in the last five years, X amount of total wins over the last five years, X amount of points for winning percentage over the last five years.

I would also exclude all rural teams from the open division. There’s no way that a small rural team would be able to compete with chaminade. Ever.  Not enough of a population to draw from.  

I like your ideas. The rankings can't be off the FHSAA rankings this year. What do you think about two open divisions? Say one for 1,500 and up and one for 1,500 and down?

Posted

2    Chaminade-Madonna (Hollywood)    13-0    72.20    26.9
3    St. Thomas Aquinas (Fort Lauderdale)    13-1    69.40    36.4
4    Cocoa    13-1    64.60    36.0
5    Norland (Miami)    14-0    63.60    33.3
6    Venice    12-2    58.80    29.4
7    Mandarin (Jacksonville)    11-3    56.30    33.7
8    Buchholz (Gainesville)    13-1    56.30    34.9
9    Central (Miami)    8-4    55.80    43.6

This is the top 8(IMG was 1st)....

according to maxpreps rankings, which is what they will be using 

thats 8 loaded teams and 4 or 5 state champs and all 8 could possibly win state titles

Posted
37 minutes ago, h8r said:

2    Chaminade-Madonna (Hollywood)    13-0    72.20    26.9
3    St. Thomas Aquinas (Fort Lauderdale)    13-1    69.40    36.4
4    Cocoa    13-1    64.60    36.0
5    Norland (Miami)    14-0    63.60    33.3
6    Venice    12-2    58.80    29.4
7    Mandarin (Jacksonville)    11-3    56.30    33.7
8    Buchholz (Gainesville)    13-1    56.30    34.9
9    Central (Miami)    8-4    55.80    43.6

This is the top 8(IMG was 1st)....

according to maxpreps rankings, which is what they will be using 

thats 8 loaded teams and 4 or 5 state champs and all 8 could possibly win state titles

Absolutely. Would be fun to watch. What I suggested would look like

Big 8

STA, Venice, Mandarin, Buchholx, Mainland, American Heritage, St. Augustine, Lakeland

Small 8

Chaminade, Cocoa, Norland, Central, Clearwater Catholic, Hawthorne, Cardinal Newman, Berkley Prep

 

Just throwing ideas out there. But I do think there is something to an open division. 

Posted
17 hours ago, h8r said:

2    Chaminade-Madonna (Hollywood)    13-0    72.20    26.9
3    St. Thomas Aquinas (Fort Lauderdale)    13-1    69.40    36.4
4    Cocoa    13-1    64.60    36.0
5    Norland (Miami)    14-0    63.60    33.3
6    Venice    12-2    58.80    29.4
7    Mandarin (Jacksonville)    11-3    56.30    33.7
8    Buchholz (Gainesville)    13-1    56.30    34.9
9    Central (Miami)    8-4    55.80    43.6

This is the top 8(IMG was 1st)....

according to maxpreps rankings, which is what they will be using 

thats 8 loaded teams and 4 or 5 state champs and all 8 could possibly win state titles

Columbus just routed Mandarin. Clown rankings. Clown Association . Can’t rely on phony 3rd party rankings. Have to use a point system.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


  • Posts

    • Nolebull, You are making a good argument for what the rule ought to be or why the rule ought to be changed.   I'm telling you what the rule is.  Interestingly, I witnessed first hand the FHSAA deal with a case that was very similar to the (presumably, hypothetical) one you just described.  A family provided a kid with a bed for the night because that kid had an unfortunate family situation that would have left him homeless for the night had a teammate's family not stepped up and given him a place to stay for the night.  Yep, you got it, impermissible benefit.  Coach and school penalized.  The difficulty is coming up with rules that can't be taken advantage of.  Where do you draw the line?   If paying for an Uber is OK, why can't you just buy the kid a car instead?  More convenient for all parties.  If you can buy a kid a meal, why can't you take his family grocery shopping and let them stock up?  Or, better yet, just give then a gift card and let them spend the money as they please.  What do you do when one school offers up a $1,000 gift card, but another school is willing to give the kid a $2,000 gift card?  Do we really want to turn high school sports into professional sports?
    • Some kids NEED to transfer to get in the best position to change the trajectory of their entire life. Could literally save their life. Difference between going to college and being stuck in your neighborhood getting lost to streets.    And I can only speak for myself, but I’m more interested in a at-risk kid changing his situation for the better in hopes of saving his life than your favorite high school team losing a game because he transferred from your favorite school. 
    • I wouldn’t be so critical of the FHSAA if they didn’t lie and say they give 2 craps about student athletes. I wish people would just be honest. But I guess if they were honest, it would mess up their hustle. 
    • Wait are you saying there is a rule that bars an adult mentor who coaches young men a sport from helping a struggling student athlete and his family with transportation? Whoa that’s next level crazy.    “Hey coach I’m on the side of the road and almost got hit. I’m miles from school and it’s 110 degrees out. Can you get me a ride?” ”Sorry. Some turds 6 hours away in Gainesville said I can’t. Hope you don’t get hit or pass out.” 
    • Say what you want, justify it however you want, wish the rules weren't what they are, but there is no question that a coach or other school representative paying for Uber rides for kids playing sports is a violation of the existing FHSAA rules.  Period.  And Teddy Bridgewater may be or have been an elite athlete, may be or become an excellent high school football coach, and/or may have his heart in the right place, but tweeting out a message to the world that you have done something that undoubtedly constitutes a violation of the rules is just plain stupid. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...