Jump to content

Recommended Posts


Posted
1 minute ago, THAT S--T WAS FUNNY said:

Well I guess hell froze over. FHSAA making their presence known for the first time in a while.

Was not expecting this to happen at all its a good thing the fhsaa is doing this and they're making a statement to everyone 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Zachk1003 said:

Was not expecting this to happen at all its a good thing the fhsaa is doing this and they're making a statement to everyone 

Its a great thing. In the TFA case they seemed to come down pretty hard. Hopefully these types of consequences will deter some of this chaos and bring some order back to high school athletics. 

Posted

So according to reports, the school self-reported that one student exceeded the "Eight Semesters of Eligibility" Bylaw (9.5.1).  The FHSAA then applied Bylaw 10.2.1, which states that if an ineligible player participates in an athletic contest, forfeiture of the game is automatic and mandatory.  Seems the FHSAA didn't do anything other than apply its own rules, so not sure I'd read too much into this particular case.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Dr. D said:

So according to reports, the school self-reported that one student exceeded the "Eight Semesters of Eligibility" Bylaw (9.5.1).  The FHSAA then applied Bylaw 10.2.1, which states that if an ineligible player participates in an athletic contest, forfeiture of the game is automatic and mandatory.  Seems the FHSAA didn't do anything other than apply its own rules, so not sure I'd read too much into this particular case.

I'm sure this isn't the first time something from Dade County ended up on the desk of the FHSAA. They didn't turn a blind eye and give a slap on the wrist this time and actually flexed their muscles. BOUT TIME!

Posted
13 hours ago, Dr. D said:

So according to reports, the school self-reported that one student exceeded the "Eight Semesters of Eligibility" Bylaw (9.5.1).  

How does this work for the kids that play on varsity in their 8th grade, and sometimes 7th grade, years?  I know it's allowed if you have an attached middle school (unfair advantage to privates again) but they will still exceed 8 semesters so how do they get around that part?

Posted
Just now, PinellasFB said:

How does this work for the kids that play on varsity in their 8th grade, and sometimes 7th grade, years?  I know it's allowed if you have an attached middle school (unfair advantage to privates again) but they will still exceed 8 semesters so how do they get around that part?

I believe there's language that states that your technical "eligibility" is from when you enter the ninth grade. So *technically* you can think of middle school players as playing on some sort of waiver-type thing. They're the exception, not the rule. 

Posted

Another thing I was wondering about, what happens if this gets discovered during the playoffs?  Do they just forfeit the next game but any results prior are just vacated as wins but the results stand (for the teams they beat)?

Posted
36 minutes ago, PinellasFB said:

Another thing I was wondering about, what happens if this gets discovered during the playoffs?  Do they just forfeit the next game but any results prior are just vacated as wins but the results stand (for the teams they beat)?

For what it's worth, in my experience, the FHSAA has a tendency to let things play out during the playoffs and then make final determinations/determine punishments once the playoffs are over (often weeks, sometimes months, after).  It's as if they just hope the team that's going to get punished will simply lose somewhere along the way and then it really won't be a big deal.  Occasionally, that team ends up going all the way, winning the title on the field, and then has to vacate the title (see Armwood a decade or so ago). 

Personally, I'd rather see the FHSAA take swift action (affording the parties involved all appropriate due process) so that teams in the early rounds of the playoffs don't run the risk of getting beaten by the team that gets punished.  That's especially true the further we are along in the playoff process -- I want to see two eligible teams playing for the state title.  But that's just me. 

Posted
24 minutes ago, Perspective said:

For what it's worth, in my experience, the FHSAA has a tendency to let things play out during the playoffs and then make final determinations/determine punishments once the playoffs are over (often weeks, sometimes months, after).  It's as if they just hope the team that's going to get punished will simply lose somewhere along the way and then it really won't be a big deal.  Occasionally, that team ends up going all the way, winning the title on the field, and then has to vacate the title (see Armwood a decade or so ago). 

Personally, I'd rather see the FHSAA take swift action (affording the parties involved all appropriate due process) so that teams in the early rounds of the playoffs don't run the risk of getting beaten by the team that gets punished.  That's especially true the further we are along in the playoff process -- I want to see two eligible teams playing for the state title.  But that's just me. 

That's because they love to take the copout anywhere they can 

Posted
1 hour ago, PinellasFB said:

How does this work for the kids that play on varsity in their 8th grade, and sometimes 7th grade, years?  I know it's allowed if you have an attached middle school (unfair advantage to privates again) but they will still exceed 8 semesters so how do they get around that part?

It's not just private schools 

Most rural public schools are the same way 

 

Williston, Fort White, Union County all have it 

Posted

Your high school eligibility clock doesn't start until you are enrolled in 9th grade. Middle school students are allowed to participate in high school sports at schools that are K-12 or 6-12. This is huge in sports like wrestling. Kids will attend a K-12 school in 6-8 grade and then transfer to their school of choice for high school. You now have five and six time state champions in wrestling. Last year Georgia passed a law prohibiting middle school athletes from participating in High school sports. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, THAT S--T WAS FUNNY said:

Your high school eligibility clock doesn't start until you are enrolled in 9th grade. Middle school students are allowed to participate in high school sports at schools that are K-12 or 6-12. This is huge in sports like wrestling. Kids will attend a K-12 school in 6-8 grade and then transfer to their school of choice for high school. You now have five and six time state champions in wrestling. Last year Georgia passed a law prohibiting middle school athletes from participating in High school sports. 

To be honest, I think that should be done here. Having middle school kids play high school sports not only gives certain teams a clear advantage, but, depending on the sport, it puts the kids at risk of injury. This is especially true of the contact sports. Having a 14 or 13 year old square off against a 18 year old in most circumstances is not wise. 

Posted

I was the sixth man on the varsity basketball team at St Stephens Episcopal in Bradenton as an 8th grader.  Joined the team late because of youth league football.  We had a very attractive girl who was a very good athlete on the team.  She was the first girl to play boys basketball in the state of Florida.  I always came off the bench at the beginning of the 2nd quarter to replace her.  When we played on the road I would regularly get booed and heckled because young men wanted her on the floor instead of me so they could watch this beautiful young woman play.  I didn’t get upset because if I was them I might do the same.  I tell you this because if I wouldn’t have been able to play as an 8th grader I wouldn’t have learned at an early stage of life the trouble a woman could cause.

Posted
23 minutes ago, MarkECannon said:

I was the sixth man on the varsity basketball team at St Stephens Episcopal in Bradenton as an 8th grader.  Joined the team late because of youth league football.  We had a very attractive girl who was a very good athlete on the team.  She was the first girl to play boys basketball in the state of Florida.  I always came off the bench at the beginning of the 2nd quarter to replace her.  When we played on the road I would regularly get booed and heckled because young men wanted her on the floor instead of me so they could watch this beautiful young woman play.  I didn’t get upset because if I was them I might do the same.  I tell you this because if I wouldn’t have been able to play as an 8th grader I wouldn’t have learned at an early stage of life the trouble a woman could cause.

Did you at least get the chance to give her a little smack on the backside when you subbed in for her?   :P 

(Yeah, yeah, I know . . . politically incorrect.  But you still smiled a little when you played that scene out in your head, didn't you?)  

Posted
22 hours ago, DarterBlue2 said:

To be honest, I think that should be done here. Having middle school kids play high school sports not only gives certain teams a clear advantage, but, depending on the sport, it puts the kids at risk of injury. This is especially true of the contact sports. Having a 14 or 13 year old square off against a 18 year old in most circumstances is not wise. 

I think its ok in a sport like wrestling becuase most of the middle school aged kids that wrestle high school are state or national level type kids and usually are in the 106, 113 120lb weight classes. Although years ago the standout LB from Dr Phillips Dillon Meeks was a state runner up at 195lb weight class as an 8th grader. That kid was a stud being able to do that in a grown mans weight class.

Posted
5 hours ago, Perspective said:

Did you at least get the chance to give her a little smack on the backside when you subbed in for her?   :P 

(Yeah, yeah, I know . . . politically incorrect.  But you still smiled a little when you played that scene out in your head, didn't you?)  

She was a senior at the time.  She was engaged to the older brother of our best player.  I would be less than honest if I didn’t admit I fantasized about more than a smack.  I apologize TMI.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


  • Posts

    • I think the argument is this:  if 'free adults are allowed to give gifts to poor kids who happen to be good at sports,' we move from an amateur environment into a professional environment.   Historically, high school sports, college sports and even the Olympics were reserved solely for amateur athletes.  Within the last couple of decades, the barriers for professionals started to erode for the Olympics.   You may recall that Jim Thorpe won gold medals in track in the 1912 Olympics, but was stripped of those medals because he had played minor league (or "semipro") baseball prior to participating in the Olympics.   Ultimately, those medals were restored a few years ago.  The USA Olympic basketball team used to be comprised only of college players.  Now, it's all pros (with one or two college stars).  Within the last 5-10 years, NIL changes have permitted college athletes to receive compensation. Before then, the rules in place for decades allowed college student-athletes to receive room, board and tuition.  The $100 post-game handshakes from alums in the locker room and brown paper bags filled with money - although they happened everywhere - were illegal (and arguably still are; they just don't happen as much because the athletes can receive money legally through NIL). The NIL world is quickly filtering down to the high school level.  However, the rules in most all states, and certainly in Florida, are rooted in the concept that only amateur athletes can compete in high school sports.   And if you allow athletes to receive gifts, or otherwise compensate them or their families, such athletes are no longer considered amateurs.   Simply put, the rules has always been that if you get compensated to do play a sport, you are considered a professional.  And professionals cannot participate in amateur sports.  Again, the rules in place (FHSAA Rules) are rooted in a clear distinction between amateur sports and professional sports.  There was a clear line that is slowly becoming more and more blurred. If you want the argument as to why the rule makes sense, I think it is this:   there is a certain beauty in amateur sports, knowing that everyone who is playing is playing for the love of the game and not for money.  Everything changes once you start compensating athletes.  As I have stated before, the concept of compensation is a slippery slope.  What do you allow and what don't you?   FHSAA rules prohibiting impermissible benefits were written before Uber even existed. But the rule is pretty clear:  if you give something to football players that you don't give to all other students, that's an impermissible benefit - especially if the benefit is given to entice a kid to come to your school.   If you allow schools/coaches/alums to compensate kids to play sports, then you take away the somewhat-level playing field.  And, over time, certain schools will dominate high school sports because they will have the financial wherewithal to attract the most talented athletes.  While this might be good for the handful of select, talented athletes, everyone else suffers.   I guess the real question is whether we just want to eliminate the distinction between amateur athletics and professional athletics altogether and simply allow the free-market system to play out for all athletes and all schools?  If you're inclined to answer this question with a "yes," I have only six words for you:  be careful what you wish for.   
    • Yes of course big shot, how dare anyone try to help some young man out with a generous offer from his own pocket! Did the new pinstripe suits arrive yet from Brooks Brothers, F. Lee Bailey, Clarence Darrow Jr?!  
    • ESPN quotes Bridgewater's Facebook post as follows:  "The suspension came from MNW and it's impossible to suspend someone who doesn't work for you.  So if im suspended from MNW im free to go to another school of my choice but IM NOT GOING ANYWHERE. "And if it comes down to it, I will volunteer from the bleachers like I used to in 2018 and 2019 when no one had a problem." Honestly, it seems like the guy has a bit of 'the rules don't apply to me' or 'I don't have to follow the rules' mentality. 
    • Yeah, where is Darter Blue? I didn't scare and chase him off like I did other posters, did I?!   
    • Yes it's true and the alumni president stepped down. From what I read the alumni president went downtown or wherever and said something. I don't know if Teddy rubbed someone the wrong way but this is what I read. But see here's the thing about this situation. Northwestern has a strong alumni and community support. Half if not all the politicians in politics graduated from Northwestern and local pastors. If this was such a big issue something should have been said way before now and I think because Teddy asked for donations this all came about. Teddy has the money to take care of these things but why should he go broke doing it.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...