Quantcast
Jump to content

THIS_IS_DILLARD

FINAL CENTRAL 35 DILLARD 0

Recommended Posts

Central has 3 loses this year in blow out fashion and granted they didn't look good but it was to 3 good teams. St. Frances #2 in the nation, Northwestern in semi finals, Chaminade in semi finals. So sometimes it takes getting hit in the mouth a few times to get it. Kinda like mama or daddy going up side our heads for us to get right. There has been turmoil within the locker room and I'm hoping the ship has got corrected. At the right time. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, peezy28 said:

That you did.... I'm reading this thread for 1st time from the beginning but knowing the end result in tears lol

Bruh. I was like @MC Rockets and just kept quiet for the most part until the last couple of days . Couldnt take it no more but man it is funny lmao.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, topnotch305 said:

Dillard field is terrible just like their performance was.. #7 was disrespectful to AJ then he fumbles all over the place lol..... Dillard had a real humbling experience lol. 

Man I know u were at the west game but this game was funny live.. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, fishspinners said:

I was really pulling for Dillard. It would have been a way better matchup for Palmetto. MC is going to breeze to another state title now.

So u expected Dillard to beat Central but struggle against Palmetto? Ok lol.. Either way none of these Dade county teams can take their foot off the gas this coming week. That's why you have a tough schedule to prepare for playoffs. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, topnotch305 said:

So u expected Dillard to beat Central but struggle against Palmetto? Ok lol.. Either way none of these Dade county teams can take their foot off the gas this coming week. That's why you have a tough schedule to prepare for playoffs. 

I'm not sure you read my post right. When I say "I was pulling for Dillard" it meant I wanted them to win. It didn't mean I thought they would win. And yes, Dillard would have been a far better matchup for Palmetto than MC is going to be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, fishspinners said:

I'm not sure you read my post right. When I say "I was pulling for Dillard" it meant I wanted them to win. It didn't mean I thought they would win. And yes, Dillard would have been a far better matchup for Palmetto than MC is going to be.

Ok im lost. Dillard wouldve been a better match up far as Dillard going up there to do what  blow them boys out or being in a nail biter with palmetto?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Zoe Boy said:

Ok im lost. Dillard wouldve been a better match up far as Dillard going up there to do what  blow them boys out or being in a nail biter with palmetto?

I think Dillard and Palmetto would have been a hell of a game. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, fishspinners said:

I think Dillard and Palmetto would have been a hell of a game. 

so you dont think Central and palmetto wont be a hell pf a game? Palmetto looks legit from their last game ive seen

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Zoe Boy said:

so you dont think Central and palmetto wont be a hell pf a game? Palmetto looks legit from their last game ive seen

 

Palmetto's loss to Lincoln stands out, though. Not the loss, for Lincoln is a decent team, but the fact Lincoln won easily. I think that and their game before last when they were taken down to the wire by a questionable team tells you all you need to know about their chances against Central.

It may not be as bad as the beating Dillard got, but it probably will be in the same range. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Zoe Boy said:

so you dont think Central and palmetto wont be a hell pf a game? Palmetto looks legit from their last game ive seen

 

Palmetto is legit but they're not on MC's level. Lincoln laid out the blueprint to beating Palmetto by killing them through the air and using their big TE in the slot. Braden River tried the same game plan and it worked for three quarters. If MC tries to lineup and run the ball down Palmetto's throat, it might be a closer game. But if MC spreads Palmetto out, there might be a running clock involved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/23/2019 at 10:38 AM, Zoe Boy said:

Bruh. I was like @MC Rockets and just kept quiet for the most part until the last couple of days . Couldnt take it no more but man it is funny lmao.

Yeah i was well aware what the results would probably be.... but man Dillard round here talking the game was close..... IDK how the points got scored or how they didnt you get 35 shi**ed you get off the sticks and to back to the lab.... Your not on their level yet period. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, peezy28 said:

Yeah i was well aware what the results would probably be.... but man Dillard round here talking the game was close..... IDK how the points got scored or how they didnt you get 35 shi**ed you get off the sticks and to back to the lab.... Your not on their level yet period. 

The homie don’t understand that lol.. He says cause Out of the 7 turnovers 5 of them was u force ? I’m like cmon I was at the game... I’m like bruh y’all still got 35-0 in the black hole lol... They got humbled tho...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I get credit for predicting everything? 

I said Dillard played nobodies all year, and the few they played with a pulse they struggled. 

Garbage schedule. I said even though they are 12-0 there is nothing special about them and nothing different than a 7-5 Dillard team with a tough schedule. 

I said Miami Central has already played 4-5 Dillard’s this year. 

I tried to told ya!!!! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, nolebull813 said:

Can I get credit for predicting everything? 

I said Dillard played nobodies all year, and the few they played with a pulse they struggled. 

Garbage schedule. I said even though they are 12-0 there is nothing special about them and nothing different than a 7-5 Dillard team with a tough schedule. 

I said Miami Central has already played 4-5 Dillard’s this year. 

I tried to told ya!!!! 

A lot of us Dade guys knew that but we kept quiet and let you do the talking lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...



  • Posts

    • UCF were FBS Champs in 2017 too. Just saying.
    • Next round posted     For those who don't have a Twitter you can make your picks below and they will be tallied after the polls close 
    • Next round will be uploaded later tonight      
    • On the flip side, here are the worst winning percentages by division from 2000-2019. Same rules apply.   NCAA D1 FBS (P5) CONF W L Pct               Kansas BIG12 78 162 0.325   Duke ACC 82 161 0.337   Vanderbilt SEC 87 155 0.360   Indiana BIG10 88 152 0.367   Illinois BIG10 91 151 0.376   Colorado PAC12 102 147 0.410   Iowa St BIG12 106 142 0.427   Syracuse ACC 104 139 0.428   Kentucky SEC 107 138 0.437   Rutgers BIG10 107 138 0.437               NCAA D1 FBS (G5) CONF W L Pct               New Mexico St IND 66 176 0.273   Eastern Michigan MAC 67 172 0.280   UNLV MWC 76 166 0.314   Army IND 80 162 0.331   UTEP CUSA 82 160 0.339   Buffalo MAC 83 158 0.344   Kent St MAC 83 155 0.349   Tulane AAC 86 156 0.355   Louisiana-Monroe SBC 85 153 0.357   Akron MAC 88 153 0.365               NCAA D1 FCS CONF W L Pct               VMI SoC 49 176 0.218   Mississippi Valley St SWAC 49 169 0.225   Valparaiso (IN) PL 60 162 0.270   Rhode Island CAA 63 163 0.279   Columbia (NY) IVY 56 144 0.280   Idaho BSC 68 170 0.286 Moved down from FBS to FCS 2018 St Francis (PA) NEC 63 154 0.290   Indiana St MVFC 67 161 0.294   Austin Peay (TN) OVC 68 159 0.300   Texas Southern SWAC 67 153 0.305               NCAA D2 CONF W L Pct               Minnesota-Crookston NSC 29 188 0.134   Savannah St (GA) SIAC 37 176 0.174 moved from D2 to FCS in 2001; moved back to D2 2019 Lock Haven (PA) PSAC 39 179 0.179   Lincoln (MO) MIAA 38 169 0.184   Livingstone (NC) CIAA 40 158 0.202 Moved up from NAIA to D2 in 2002. Pace (NY) NE-10 44 158 0.218   Kentucky Wesleyan GMAC 48 160 0.231 Moved down D2 to NAIA 2004; back up to D2 in 2006  New Mexico Highlands RMC 53 163 0.245   St Anselm (NH) NE-10 51 154 0.249   Clark Atlanta (GA) SIAC 50 150 0.250               NCAA D3 CONF W L Pct               Hiram (OH) NCAC 31 169 0.155   Iowa Wesleyan UMAC 38 169 0.184 Moved from NAIA to D3 in 2013 North Park (IL) CCIW 37 163 0.185   Wilmington (OH) OAC 40 160 0.200   Whittier (CA) SCIAC 37 144 0.204   Lawrence (WI) Midwest 42 156 0.212   Hamilton (NY) NESCAC 35 128 0.215   Kenyon (OH) NCAC 44 156 0.220   Lewis & Clark (OR) NWC 40 135 0.229   FDU-Florham (NJ) NJAC 46 154 0.230               NAIA CONF W L Pct               Culver-Stockton (MO) HAAC 48 168 0.222   Mayville St (ND) NSAA 46 157 0.227   Montana St-Northern FC 57 153 0.271   SW Assemblies of God (TX) SAC 62 138 0.310   Central Methodist (MO) HAAC 68 145 0.319   Dakota St (SD) NSAA 66 138 0.324   Union (KY) MSC 69 141 0.329   Trinity International (IL) MSFA 71 144 0.330   Panhandle St (OK) SAC 70 139 0.335 Moved from D2 to NAIA in 2017 St Mary (KS) KCAC 69 134 0.340  
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...