Quantcast
Jump to content

Sign in to follow this  
OldSchoolLion

Name These Two Teams - Armwood and Baker

Recommended Posts


31 minutes ago, Jesse said:

Madison king of Rings tonight.

Much respect for Madison County.  But with all due respect, Madison County is basically king of 30 small north FL schools and a handful of others.  When MC played against the likes of Bolles, Chaminade and others in 2A earlier this century, they were competitive, but definitely not kings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, OldSchoolLion said:

Much respect for Madison County.  But with all due respect, Madison County is basically king of 30 small north FL schools and a handful of others.  When MC played against the likes of Bolles, Chaminade and others in 2A earlier this century, they were competitive, but definitely not kings.

Bolles gets transfers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Jesse said:

Bolles gets transfers

Here's the thing

 

When you start saying your "kings" whether or not you face teams with transfers is meaningless, part of being kings is being better than whoever you play regardless of circumstances

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, OldSchoolLion said:

Much respect for Madison County.  But with all due respect, Madison County is basically king of 30 small north FL schools and a handful of others.  When MC played against the likes of Bolles, Chaminade and others in 2A earlier this century, they were competitive, but definitely not kings.

Madison County u said Bolles I was thinking u was going to the likes of Cocoa Taylor county South Sumter 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • There is no perfect system.  But, as you point out, I've never been one of those who says the whole playoff system should be geared up in hopes of have the two "best" teams in each region playing in each of the four regional finals.   There are just way too many factors to make that determination and way too many things happen along the road to a regional final game (upsets being just one of those things).  How many times do the top 2 seeds in a tennis tournament end up matched up against each other in the finals? How often do you see four # 1 seeds make the NCAA Final Four in basketball or hockey?  How often do you see the #1 seed in the AFC and the #1 seed in the NFC square off in the Super Bowl? More often than not, the cream ultimately rises to the top, but I just don't think it's worth the effort in high school football. 
    • no I said I was shocked you didn't have them higher.  I would have.  
    • Fort Myers girls basketball: State champs '16, '17 and '18.  Semi-finals '15 and '19.   Softball:  State champs '17 . Semi-finals '18 and '19.    
    • And many coaches and AD's have the same feeling and that's why when it was offered last cycle to remove the district champs getting top 4 guaranteed they fought it   But if you feel that way you can't them turn around and say the fhsaa isn't ensuring the best matchups are taking place if you also want the district champs to be guaranteed a top 4 seed, just the reality of it (yes I know you didn't say that specifically yourself, I'm just pointing out the flaw in the line of thinking when people out there try to play both ends of the fence)   Just like many of us knew when the Miami district of death was around that Miami Central, Miami Northwestern and Carol City were the best 3 teams in the entire region but only one would have a seed in the top 4
    • I understand your point.   From my perspective, it just shows the fallacy of trying to determine who the "best" teams are before the playoff games have been played.    Again, I see your point, but I'd have a tough time seeding a district runner-up over all the district winners except for one and giving a district runner-up the home-field advantage over all the district winners except for one.  Winning a district ought to count for something and penalizing a district winner (with a lower RPI and, therefor, a seeding worse than a district runner-up) because the other teams in its district had a bad year just doesn't sit right with me. 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...