Quantcast
Jump to content

State Final Trivia-Unique 6A Title Game


Recommended Posts

In 2005, something unique happened at the state final series that has only happened once in FHSAA state series history.  What was it? 

There could be more than one answer, but there is one particular I am looking for.  For instance, some teams won their one and only state title in school history, but it is not that. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was 2005 the year they held the finals in Miami, but in two different stadiums for some reason because of delays (hurricanes maybe) or was it the year that the Muck dominated the finals with 4 teams making it (Clewiston, Glades Central, Pahokee, and Glades Day)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Of the two times the finals were held in Miami/Dade, this is the only one in which not a single Dade County team played for a title. 

2. The large class title, 6A, final featured a Palm Beach County team versus a Broward County team. I don't think that's ever happened before or after. 

3. Nease and Palm Beach Gardens won their one and only title to date 

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, gatorman-uf said:

Was 2005 the year they held the finals in Miami, but in two different stadiums for some reason because of delays (hurricanes maybe) or was it the year that the Muck dominated the finals with 4 teams making it (Clewiston, Glades Central, Pahokee, and Glades Day)?

The finals were held in two different stadiums in Miami, but that is not the answer.

Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, DarterBlue2 said:

1. Of the two times the finals were held in Miami/Dade, this is the only one in which not a single Dade County team played for a title. 

2. The large class title, 6A, final featured a Palm Beach County team versus a Broward County team. I don't think that's ever happened before or after. 

3. Nease and Palm Beach Gardens won their one and only title to date 

Not in 6a but they have had Broward vs Palm Beach very recently, twice

 

Chaminade Madonna vs Oxbridge Academy in 2017

Chaminade Madonna vs Kings Academy 2018 

 

 

3 is correct but idk if that is the specific answer, honestly I think it's likely the very last one you mentioned with no Dade team playing for a state title 

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, gatorman-uf said:

Was 2005 the year they held the finals in Miami, but in two different stadiums for some reason because of delays (hurricanes maybe) or was it the year that the Muck dominated the finals with 4 teams making it (Clewiston, Glades Central, Pahokee, and Glades Day)?

That happened a year later in 2006

Glades Day def North Florida Christian 

Pahokee def Trinity Catholic

Bolles def Clewiston 

Glades Central def  (undefeated) Pine Forest 

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, OldSchoolLion said:

In 2005, something unique happened at the state final series that has only happened once in FHSAA state series history.  What was it? 

There could be more than one answer, but there is one particular I am looking for.  For instance, some teams won their one and only state title in school history, but it is not that. 

 

Has it happened since 2005?

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, DarterBlue2 said:

1. Of the two times the finals were held in Miami/Dade, this is the only one in which not a single Dade County team played for a title. 

2. The large class title, 6A, final featured a Palm Beach County team versus a Broward County team. I don't think that's ever happened before or after. 

3. Nease and Palm Beach Gardens won their one and only title to date 

You are warm.  Think in even broader terms.

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, DarterBlue2 said:

The 6A, largest class title game was between two South Florida teams which were less than 30 miles away from each other geographically? 

The 6A title game was the only FHSAA state final game in the largest classification ever played by teams from ___________ counties.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Proseteye said:

In 2005 Trinity Catholic went undefeated and beat Pahokee in the championship game. Robert Love broke the all time pass completion record in spite of the Celtics defeating his team. I believe this might be it.

Wrong answer...Not even close. LOL

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


  • Posts

    • Maybe it's just me, but it seems like when a coach lets the backups in a basketball game at the end of a game and the kids try to score, no matter how far up their team is, the announcers and fans don't make a deal about them running the score.  Yet in football, there seems to be this ethical issue.   And us football folks are supposed to be tough.
    • I don’t think you can be accused of running up the score if you have backups and 3rd stringers in. No matter if they are passing it or running a no huddle.  Now they could be questioned about clock management if they are passing it late in the fourth up big, but if they want to get the backups real game reps, I’m not against it.   
    • So, notwithstanding my initial attempt to focus this question on the issue of whether you need to have a certain personnel in a game in order to run the "take a knee" play, nolebull and hornet are addressing the unasked question of whether a team should ever call off the dogs and stop trying to score.  While I think I've heard all the arguments on both side of this issue, I'll go ahead and ask the question:   is there ever such thing as "running up the score?"  Does it matter who's in the game for the team that's way ahead?   Does it matter what plays the team ahead is running?  If so, why?  If 2nd and 3rd string WR's are finally getting into the game, is it bad form for the offense to continue throwing the ball to these kids?   If you contend that the offense can continue to pour it on, no matter what the score and no matter how much time is left in the game, would it be OK for the offense to call unused timeouts to stop the clock and allow them to run one or two more plays in an effort to win the game by 49 points instead of 42?  
    • Pure nonsense. When the 2nd or 3rd string gets into the game with a minute or two left, they shouldn't try to score???????  In the words of the great Head Ball Coach: "it's not my job to stop us from scoring, it's their job".
    • I’m curious to know how many times Nebraska threw the ball in the fourth quarter after the game was out of reach  If the team winning by a large margin has to run the ball to not be accused of running up the score then shouldnt that apply to the losing team as well?   Because what kind of backwards shit would you be playing if you said one team is allowed to conduct their offense however they see fit but the other team has to run it the way we choose to not be accused of bad sportsmanship?  I miss seeing 110-0 scores like in the past. 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...